From: "Gary Voss" <Time02112@...>
Reply-To: tapten@yahoogroups.com
To: tapten@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [tapten] [Update]: Stan Romanek's Mystery Equations
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:08:07 -0500

For those of you who have been following the San Romanek's story since

Dear Forum!

Here is a decoding of the Romanek equations by Jack Kasher, PhD and a physicist and academic in terms of his language used, if not by profession (with metaphysically healthy leanings imo). Jack's decoding is in concordance with mine and I am able to clarify his analysis. This is of particular importance with regards to Item #5 the equation which relates Voltage/Area to the change of the magnetic field flux B (Tesla) changing over time: V=n.a.dB/dt.
It opens the door to the unification physics as given in quantum relativity and the superstring parameters of modular duality.
There is much physics in the commentary I have given follwing Jack Kasher's analysis for the interested reader. This posting then discusses page 2, the page written during the night, as in Kasher's treatment.

Page 1 I have discussed in my other post and also in agreement with Jack Kasher.

Interpretation of Stan Romanek's Two Pages Filled

with Symbols, Equations, and Drawings

The symbol on the upper left is clearly helium, with two protons and two neutrons in the nucleus, and two electrons circling around outside. The arrow may mean that it is used to bombard element 115, which is indicated both by the circled number 115 and by the correct electron configuration, which is

5f¹⁴6d¹⁰7s²7p³

In Stan's expression the f looks like a 6; but it must be an f to be correct. Also, his s resembles a 5; but, again, it must be an s to be correct.

There is no way that Stan could know this configuration on his own - I didn't know it myself until one of my colleagues at the University of Nebraska at Omaha helped me calculate it. So Stan got it from "elsewhere,"

whatever that means. I should add that after I did confirm that it is correct, it took me about five minutes to find it on the internet by using Yahoo and the keywords element 115. But I would not have been able to confirm that it is correct before I was shown the order in which the electron energy levels would fill for element 115.

The equation on the second line,

[Nabla] x B = μ J + 1/c² .∂E/∂T′,

is the generalized form of Ampere's law, and is the fourth of Maxwell's equations from electromagnetic theory. The equation is precisely and correctly written, although normally we would use t instead of T′. But Stan also uses T for time on the other page, the one he wrote during the night.

An electric charge in motion generates a magnetic field. This equation describes the relationship between the moving charge and the resulting magnetic field. B is this field, J is a flowing group of charges, and ∂E/∂T′ is

the time rate of change of the electric field produced by those charges. μ is the magnetic permeability of free space, normally written as μ_o, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum, 3 x 1010 cm/sec. What is interesting about the form here is that the symbol 1/c² is not usually used-in fact, I have never seen it written this way in any textbook, even though it is correct. 1/c² is equal to ε_oμ_o where ε_o is the permittivity of free space. Since Stan uses μ instead of μ_o, I would expect to see εμ instead of 1/c² here. This is how it is written in the textbooks. This may seem like a small point, but it does indicate to me a working knowledge of Maxwell's equations, and not just something copied from a textbook. Again, I don't see how Stan could be familiar with this equation on his own, especially in the 1/c² form.

The next symbol is the small circle with the arrow, inside the larger circle. I don't know what it means, but it does equal the straight line with dots at each end, followed by the curved line, also with dots at the ends.

These may indicate that flat space can be curved, so that one can travel quickly from one point to the other (i.e., from one dot to the other). This could be done by creating a wormhole.

The third line on this page shows the constellation Orion, with a circle around the star Mintaka, which is 920 light years from the Earth. The circle apparently indicates that the extraterrestrials come from Mintaka. This is an O9 type star, which means that it has a surface temperature of about 30,000 K. A star of this type lives only on the order of a few million years before it becomes a red giant, so there is no way a planet like the Earth circling this star would have enough time for intelligent life to evolve like it did here.

Perhaps they colonized a planet there, coming from somewhere else.

The two curved lines with the curly line going through between them might signify that the beings journeyed from Mintaka to the Earth through a wormhole. The dots and circles that follow seem to indicate our solar

system, starting with the Sun at the bottom. The Earth would be the third dot, and is circled. They even included the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter by drawing the curved line. What is interesting is that there are TEN dots, indicating ten planets, not the nine that we know of.

The second pair of curved lines with the curly line between may indicate that they would then travel to another earthlike planet through another wormhole. The circle with the arrow within the larger circle is like the one on the second line, and may again be the symbol for curving space to make travel much quicker.
Drake's equation, which follows this symbol, suggests that they would be going to another earthlike planet. This equation, though very speculative and inexact, does provide a framework for calculating the number of earthlike planets in our galaxy on which intelligent life has evolved and developed technology similar to ours. The x 100 may mean that earthlike planets with intelligent life and technology are all over the place. Note that Stan correctly writes each of the subscripts in each of the terms isn't Drake's equation.

I find it interesting that there are equal signs throughout this page, indicating that each term leads to the next. I am speculating, perhaps too wildly in connecting element 115 and Ampere's law, but here is a possible

interpretation.

Helium is used to bombard element 115, which results in an intense flow of electric charges. This creates a very strong magnetic field, which is used to create a wormhole for space travel. The extraterrestrials go through the wormhole from Mintaka to the Earth, then pass on to more earthlike planets, warping space each time to speed up the travel.

2) The Second Page, Written During the Night

The second and third lines of this page are explanations and

approximations of the terms used in the first line, so let's start with them.

α = e²/ ħc ~ 1/137

This is the fine structure constant used in quantum electrodynamics.

The funny symbol used here by Stan has to be the Greek letter alpha, since e²/ ħc is the fine structure constant, and alpha is the symbol used for it; c has been defined above;  ħ is Plank's constant h divided by 2π; where h is 6.62x10^-27 erg-seconds;  e is the charge on the electron, which is 4.8x10-10 in esu units and
(1.6x10^-19 coulombs in mks units).

Tony B. says in {}:

{2. A ↔2πe²/hc ~1/137; 2e↔h/2pmc ~ 10^-11 cm
This is simply the Alpha Finstructure Constant Alpha=2πe²/hc
and the Compton Radius R_Compton=λ_Compton/2π  in R_Compton=h/2πm_ec,
calculating for the electron's m_e as about  3.8 x10^-13 m.

Jack does not mention the enigmatic '2e' as it represents a length-scale, namely the electron's Compton wavelength which is R_Compton=R_e/Alpha and which is also the 1st Bohr Radius for Hydrogen R_Bohr1=R_e/Alpha².

This links magnificently to the atomic spectra for the elements in Rydberg's Constant (R_∞) as a function of Alpha³=4πR_eR_∞.

This will prove of major importance in any future technological application of the unification physics.

This unification physics rests on the Squareroot of Alpha as the Planck-Length-Oscillation.

Planck-Bounce=Minimum Heisenberg Displacement=e/c² dimensionless (superstring vibration) which, for the Planck-Length (L_P=R_P=√(hG/2πc³)) is precisely √Alpha.L_P=e/c² in string units.

Stan Romanek possibly infers 'twice the electron's superstringed parameter' as '2e'; which is associatively correct.

R_e is about twice the proton radius to define the realm of the strong nuclear interaction in so 3 fermi.

The Compton wavelength of the electron so is elegantly partitioned into boundaries of concentric shells.

Innermost the macroquantised Planck-Length (we'll come to that later in this post as the L_P².L product), followed by R_e/2 then 2R_proton~R_e then R_Compton, then R_Bohr1 and then the atomic electron configuration shells}.

λ_e ≡ ħ/mc ~ 10-11 cm

This is the Compton wavelength of the electron. m is the mass of the electron. Determining the position of an electron to within this distance requires enough energy to create another electron. The exact value of the

Compton wavelength of the electron is 3.86 x 10^-11 cm.

The mc written next appears in the first line, with m again being the mass of the electron, and c the speed of light in vacuum. Possibly trying to explain this term, Stan follows this with

mc² ~ ½ MeV

Tony B. says:
{3. mc -> mc² ~ 1/2 MeV

This relates the Kinetic Energy for the Electron as relativistic expression m_ec² to its  low-speed Kinetic Energy approximation ½m_ev²}.

This is the rest mass of the electron given in millions of electron volts. The exact value is 0.511 MeV. Notice that Stan uses the precise notation of capital M, small e, and capital V.

L_p² ~ 10^-66 cm²

This is the square of the Planck length, and is sometimes referred to as the Planck area. Physicists suspect that quantum gravity will become important for understanding physics at about this scale. Taking the square

root, L_p ~ 10^-33 cm. The exact value is calculated from L_p= √(ħG/c³) =1.61x10^-33 cm, where G is the gravitational constant, 6.67x10^-8 dyne.cm²/gram². It is curious that Stan writes L_p as the square of the Planck

length, rather than just the length itself. This requires him to square the 10^-33 to get 10^-66.

Tony B. says:

{4. L_p² ~ 10^-66 cm²
This is simply the Planck-Area as (L_P )² ~ 4.4 x10 -70 m²}.

Now, to the top line on this page.

-8πe²/λ_e²L_p²

This is the third term in the top line. The fourth term, -10⁷³ GeV/cm³, shows that the units for each of the five terms is energy per unit volume. If in the third term we insert the value for e, 4.8x10^-10 esu, and the

approximations for L_p and λ_e, 10^-33 cm and 10^-11 cm, and convert to GeV/cm³ (1.6x10^-3 erg=1 GeV), we get -3.62x10⁷³ GeV/cm³, which corresponds to his ~ -10⁷³ GeV/cm³. If, on the other hand, we insert the exact values for L_p and λ_e, namely 1.61x10^-33 cm and 3.86x10^-11 cm, we get 9.37x10⁷¹ GeV/cm³ ~ 10⁷² GeV/cm³, which does not quite match the 10⁷³. So Stan (or whoever) is using the approximations for L_p and λ_e when making the calculations. This makes it even more unlikely that Stan could find these expressions in any textbook. This term can be written 8π(-e²/λ_e)/λ_eL_p.

Tony B. says:
1. dΔw_x/∂V=-8πamc/λ_eL_p²=-8πe²/(λ_eL_P)² ~-10⁷³ GeV/cm³ ~ -10^-45 m_pc²/L_p³.

The Compton wavelength here is actually a Compton Radius and the correct formulation as used becomes: λ_e=h/2πm_ec=R_ce.

This equation encompasses rather a great amount of unification physics and even the obviously 'wrong' mathematical notation for the {d/∂}- differential operator bears a deeper significance, as we shall discover. This 'error' is duly noted by Jack Kasher, who however chooses not to speculate on the meaning of it, except the asking for more clarification.

The factor a has units of [Velocity] for the 'workfunction' w_x in units of [J] and [eJ] and must be dimensionless for the Action=Charge² superconductivity law for a unitary impedance or resistance.

Actually this IS the Action Law, as Jack Kasher has discovered in his analysis (see further down).

This can be seen via dimensional consistency in: a[kgm/s])=[J]=[kgm²/s²], which says a=[m/s] and a proportionality leading to a=Alpha.c for dimensionless Alpha=2πke²/hc=e²/2ε_ohc=60πe²/h in stringed units and as detailed following.

Now Jack uses nonstandard SI units and the cgs-system with chargequantum e=4.8x10^-10 esu or electrostatic units, where e=1.6x10^-19 Coulombs becomes multiplied by k=1/4πε_o=1/G_o in superstring parameters, where ε_o=1/120πc is dimensionless, i.e. in the Action Law.

Then 1=4πε_o defines the statcoulomb as 1/(3x10⁹)=3.33..x10^-10 Coulombs or e/(4.8.x10^-10).

Now I personally don't like the cgs-esu-emu system, and it is used less and less in practice, being replaced by the mks system and 'unified' Planck-Units, (which I also don't like).

Because the conventional cgs units eliminate the coefficients of π say in the Coulomb Law and the Biot-Savart law, they write 1/4πε_o=1=μ_o/4π.

This is simply the statement μ_oε_o=1 as dimensionless 1/c² in unitisation.

Now quantum relativity starts with that unification in saying that the Maxwell-Law: μ_oε_o=1/c² is finestructured in μ_o=120π/c and ε_o=1/120πc and then leading directly to the Action-Law via Unitised Resistance as in the Quantum Hall Effect with Hall-Voltage over Hall-Current (VH/IH)=h/ne² being quantised in integer n, which is the chargequantum count.

But Jack Kasher (and Stan Romanek) have used the cgs system, whilst I have not.

In my dimensional analysis, I must so obtain the correct numerics with my SI units.

As 1 electronvolt (eV) is 'e' Joules, 1 Joule/Cubicmetre in SI becomes J/m³=(10^-6/e) eV/cm³ and for 1GeV=10⁹ eV we have (10 ^-15/e) GeV/cm³ as the appropriate units in SI.

θ=10^-15/e~6,250 as the SI conversion factor from Joules/m³ into GeV/cm³.

1 GeV is so about 1.6x10^-10 Joules with 1 erg being 10^-7 Joules (SI).

Now my analysis uses h=e² from the start unitising e²=h in the actual derivation as:

Resistance=Voltage/Current=(Energy/Charge)/(Charge/Time)=Action/Charge².

As a=e²/λ_em_ec=2πe²/h,  by the definition for the electronic Compton radius, the action law crystallizes immediately, with the factor  λ_e=h/2πm_ec in (1) as required.

But if one now changes the Compton lambda, one also alters (increases) the electronmass to some other value and this is the reason for Stan Romanek's 'discrepancy' in the Gigaelectronvolt expression, which Jack Kasher addresses, but leaves open for interpretation.

Numerically, (1) calculates now as 8π⁴θke²c⁵m_e²/G_oh³=θ.64k²π⁴e²c⁵m_e²/h³~θx10⁶⁸~5.7x10⁷¹, and the Romanek approximation without the esu units for a string G=G_o.

The discrepancy derives from the substitution of the Compton radius for the electron as a minimum with a smaller radius and hence a greater mass. The key to this is the last expression, engaging the Planck-Mass and the Planck-Energy E_P=m_Pc² as discussed by Jack Kasher.

10^-45.m_Pc²/L_P³=10^-45.√{(hc⁵/2πG_o)/(hG_o/2πc³)³}=√{4π²c¹⁴/h²G_o⁴}/10⁴⁵=2π.10^-45.c⁷/hG_o² and which calculates as about 1.7x10⁶⁸  J/m³ or so 10⁷² GeV/cm³. The last value assigns a new Compton radius R_c=λ_c/2π as substitute for ONE of the λ_e's in the equality:

Alpha=2πke²/hc={λ_e/λ_P}{λ_e.10^-45/4hc}E_P  and where now the term λ_e.10^-45/4hc =1/E' for a finestructuring for a Rydberg-Energy:

E'=R_∞hc=Alpha³.hc/4πR_e=m_ee⁴/8ε_o²h²=4hc.10⁴⁵/λ_e =8πm_ec².10⁴⁵~(9/25)³8πm_ec²/R_e³ and where the classical electron radius  R_e is dimensionless as a 'confinement quantum' R_e=ke²/m_ec²=10¹⁰λ_w/360 for the spacetime boundary of the wormhole.

The Romanek 'notation-error' so engages the energy 'workfunction' dE=h.df=c².dm in a subjective meaning. The numerator remains 'continuous' in the units of energy dE and the 'full' differentiation, whilst the denominator becomes a 'partial differentiation'  in the volume element ∂V.

The volume element ∂V then is 'partitioned' into characteristic expressions for the boundary conditions for spacetime metrics in the Planck-Radius, the Classical Electron Radius and the Compton Radii of elementary particle eigenstates and where the 'measurement units' for those boundary conditions can be rendered dimensionless in the form of the string-scale ratios between them.

Stan's last expression in terms of the Planck-Energy, then hints at a finestructuring for the Planck-Volume as the product of the Planck-Area and a 'magnification' radius (a form of L.L_P² as proposed by mainstream physicists like  Ng and Van Dam).

The magnitude of L=λ_w/2π as the wormhole radius as a finestructured quantisation for R_e to relate the string physics to the nuclear physics of the inner atom.

E'~m_ec²/R_e³ so distributes the eigen-energy of the electron in the nuclear interaction zone asymptotically and manifests as the 'scale' for the Higgsian inertia induction, the size of the weakons and the restriction zone for the quarkian- and gluonic colour charges.

Then the electron self-energy is expressible in the form of the limiting spacetime quantisation in:  m_e=e²/4πε_oR_ec² =[360.10^-10/2π]ke²/R_wc².

This formulation incorporates the radian definition, transforming the angular loop-parameter for the demetricated physics within the wormhole into the linearised spacetime expression without the wormhole horizon.

The action law does away with the units and the conversions as instead of the Compton wavelength λ_e , I use the actual quantum limit of the wormhole.

The significance is deeper and follows below in the magnetic permeability constant.

I am introducing the following units and as already utilized:
L_P=Planck-Length=√(G_oh/2πc³)

m_P =Planck-Mass=√(hc/2πG_o)

Wormhole perimeter=λ_w=10^-22 m
e=Coulomb Charge Quantum; c=lightspeed c; h=Planck's Constant
G_o=1/k=Boundary Gravitational Constant= 1.1111x10^-10 Nm²/kg²
m_e=ElectronMass; μ_o=Magnetic permeability Constant=120π/c
B=Magnetic Flux Density, H=Magnetic Field Intensity

Now consider the expression: Alpha=2πke²/hc=e²/2ε_ohc=μ_oce²/2h=6oπe²/h, in using the ε_o=1/120πc  permittivity definition.

Also Kasher's  a=c.Alpha=ce²/h=e²/λ_em_e  becomes  c.Alpha=ke²/2ε_o=½e²μ_oc²

This gives the ratio μ_o/ε_o=(120π)²=(Z_o)² dimensionless as the square of the 'Free-Space-Impedance' Z_o=μ_oc.

So Alpha=½(120π)e²/h=½Z_o(e²/h)=½(μ_oc)/h.

Jack's am_ec=e²/λ_e leads directly to a=2πe²/h=c.Alpha/k and directly to the action law using the electron parameters and cgs units (omitting k), which Stan also used or intuited.

Unification Physics derives the crucial Planck-Length-Oscillation (PLO) by consideration of:

MagnetoCharge=e*=ElectronSize.c² mapped as
ElectroCharge=e=PLO.c² with PLO=e/ c² by definition.

We can write, using the de Broglie matter wavelength L_plo=PLO and the
Action Law:
Mass M=Energy/c²=hc/(c²L_plo)=(h/c)(c²/e)=(e²c/e)=[ec]_unified.
This is nought but the established mass of an magnetic monopole as [ec] kg or [ec]c²EnergyUnits in Electronvolts as eV in Stan's #1.
And this calculates as c³ GeV as per his expression GeV/c³!

Since Action=Charge²=Energy.Time=Momentum.Displacement the w_x also relates to the fundamental superstring quantum, given by the magnetocharge as inverse energy.

The mapping between the superstring 'prespace' and the measurement realm is the PLO as abstract coupled to the manifesting Coulomb charge 'e' and the electron radius as manifesting, coupled to the elusive monopole's magnetocharge 'e*'.

The mapping is : 2R_ec²=e*=1/E* and L_P.√Alpha.c²=e for E* the vibratory dual of the heterotic superstring HE(8x8).

But 2R_ec² has units of Volume.Angular Acceleration, which allows us to define the StarCoulomb* (C*) as a new unit for this mapping of magnetocharges.

We can also define an 'Space-Awareness Quantum' df/dt as this angular acceleration of the timerate of frequency change.

One can say, that the 'space-awareness' acts as a quasi-angular acceleration on a Volume Quantum and embodied in the primary mapping e*=1/hf*=2R_ec²=Volume*.Awareness*.

One can easily link this to the Newtonian 'ForceLaw' extension in differentiating f=d(momentum)/dt and in using the m_o=hf/c² gauge identity with the relativistic mass-velocity relation.

The result is F=F_a+F_alpha, the alpha-term being characterised in the term h/c²df/dt.

So this alpha-force remains largely undetected, because the coefficient h/c²~7.4x10^-51 being so small.

Nevertheless, all inertial systems of dynamic interaction carry a small perturbation due to F_alpha.

The upper limit is f*²=9x10⁶⁰ and its inverse is the modular dual and with f'=1/f* the eigenfrequency for all masses whatsoever, quantised in m'=E'/c²=hf'/c² and E' the winded dual of the aforementioned heterotic superstring.

But in Stan's equation then, the w_x stands for a 'workfunction' changing energy in terms of unitvolume.

Monopolic mass  as [ec] also relates to the differential df/dt with f units of angular velocity (w=2πf), and related to w=v/r=v/λ_dB  in De Broglie matter waves. This will reappear in equation #5 as dB/dt=Voltage/Area.

There the phasespeeds are always greater than c and bounded in the groupspeeds always less than c and the scaled velocity becomes V(n)=R(n).f as a function of cycletime n=H_ot and dn/dt=H_o and H_o a cosmic 'Hubble-Frequency'.

{de Broglie V_phase=λf=(h/mV_group).(mc²/h)=c²/V_group>c for all V_group<c}.

Now the monopolic unity mass [ec] has conventional units of Charge.Velocity=Current.Length.

So Mass can be interpreted as (Maxwell's) Didsplacement-Current in a premetric or wormholed string-space.

Current in terms of frequency is I=2Nef for quantisation N and Cooper-paired electrons say.

The factor of 10^-45 is, as Jack explains the proportionality between the Planck-Density m_P/L_P³, which is 1.6x10^-8/8x10^-105~2x10⁹⁶ kg/m³ in SI units. The Energy-Density so is matter density times c² in 1.8x10¹¹³Joules/m³ with 1000 g/10⁶ cm³=1kg/m³ as the mass density.

1GeV~1.6x10^-19 Joules and so this is also 1.1x10¹²³ GeV/m³=1.1x10¹¹⁷ GeV/cm³ and differing in the approximate 10⁴⁵ factor from the 10⁷³ approximate from before.

Furthermore, the L.L_P² volume is just what is proposed in the Ng-VanDam papers as the limits for the measurement physics.

It is under current investigation in the sensitivity limits for gravitational wave measurement techniques, say LIGO and LISA.

So the substitution of λ_w=10^-22 meters is rendered orthodox physics in present investigation into physical/theoretical criteria of unification physics.

The following discusses what I have indicated in Jack's labellings.

Note that his a=alpha.c is the action law as Alpha=60πe²/h transforms into Alpha=e²/2ε_ohc as c.Alpha=e²/2ε_oh→1/2ε_o=2π under the esu/emu unifications and h-bar=h/2π.

The expression in parentheses is the electrostatic or binding energy between an electron and a positron which are a distance λe apart. As we will see next, when we look at the second term, this is also equal to αm_ec², the fine structure constant times the rest energy of the electron. So these terms are not just random letters thrown together, but have some physical meaning.

-8πam_ec/λ_eL_p²

This is the second term in the top line. If we equate the second and third terms, as Stan does, after canceling the 8, π, L_p², and one of the λ_e, we are left with am_ec = e²/λ_e. Substituting λ_e≡ ħ/m_ec, we have am_ec=e²m_ec/ħ, or a = e²/ħ = (e²/ħc)c = αc. So in the second term a = αc, the fine structure constant time the speed of light. Thus the second term is

-8παm_ec²/λ_eL_p

When numbers are substituted into this expression, we get -9.37x10⁷²GeV/cm³ ~ -10⁷³ GeV/cm³, which matches Stan's approximation given in  the fourth term. The reason for the difference in the two calculations is that in going from the third term to the second term I used the exact value of λ_e instead of Stan's approximation. So the second, third, and fourth terms in the top line match; and, in addition, we have found out that the a in the second term must be the fine structure constant times the speed of light, a = αc.

A final note about this term, -8παm_ec²/λ_eL_p

Something close to this, -L_p^-3αm_ec²=-αm_ec²/L_p³, appears in footnote 13 of Jack Sarfatti's article:

The Micro-Quantum Vacuum, 4th draft, 11/14/2002: (I've underlined the relevant line)

13. We do not need the electron-phonon interaction here as in a real superconductor with real electron-electron pairs. The Fermi momentum is ~ h/L_p. The binding energy is the virtual pair is ~ αm_pc² ~ -10¹⁷ GeV ~ critical temperature to destroy vacuum superconductivity. The condensation energy density is ~ -L_p^-3(m_e/m_p)αm_pc² ~ -L_p^-3αm_ec² ~ 10^99-2 Mev/cc. The photon rest mass is ~ 10^-65 gm with a Meissner penetration depth ~ 10²⁸ cm, so that the ratio of penetration depth to coherence length of the macro-quantum vacuum >> 1, i.e. a hard superconductors (sic) with magnetic vortex string topological defects.

If we drop the 8π, what is left of the second term, -αmc²/λ_eL_p², is very close in form to this condensation energy density, -αm_ec²/L_p³. The difference is that λ_e has been substituted for one of the L_p, so that we have λ_eL_p instead of L_p.

I don't know what the physical interpretation of Stan's term would be.

10^-45m_pc²/L_p

This is the last term in the top line. This term apparently was included because the "writer" wants to show us that the energy density in the second, third, and fourth terms is not beyond what is physically possible. The last

term includes the Planck mass, m_p. This is the mass whose Compton wavelength, ħ/mc, is equal to its Schwarzschild radius, 2Gm/c². This latter is the radius a mass would have if it becomes a black hole. When the Compton wavelength is equated to the Schwarzschild radius the 2 is not included in the latter, so that the two lengths will be equal to the Planck length, instead of 2.28 x 10^-33 cm. Equating ħ/mc to Gm/c² and solving for the mass leads to m_p = 2.177 x 10^-5 grams. The largest energy density possible is the expression given in the last term in line 1, m_pc²/L_p.  Inserting the exact values for m_p and c and the approximation 10^-33 cm for L_p into the last term, 10^-45m_pc²/L_p³, and converting to GeV/cm³, we are left with 10^-45x1.22x10¹¹⁸ GeV/cm³= 1.22x10⁷³ GeV/cm³ ~ 10⁷³ GeV/cm³, as needed.

dΔw_x/∂V

This is the first term in the top line. It appears that the V is volume, since all the rest of the terms have volume in the denominator. I am not certain that the w_x  is correct. It cannot be ω_x= 2πf_x, the angular frequency in the x direction, since the units of ω are 1/time, and the term in the numerator must have units of energy. So I am not certain what this term is.The Δ indicates that it is a small amount of whatever w_x is. The d in both numerator and denominator indicates that this term is the rate of change of Δw_x with respect to volume; i.e., the derivative of Δw_x with respect to volume.

I should point out here that the term in the denominator appears to actually be ∂V, and not dV. Perhaps Stan just didn't finish the downward stroke on the d. In any case, ∂V is incorrect. You could also ask him for the physical significance of the energy densities expressed in the second and third terms, and why he chose to use λ_eL_p for the volume.

If Stan is hypnotized again, it would be good to ask him what he means by this first term-what is the "w_x," and what is meant by the Δw_x and its rate of change with volume.

This completes the analysis of the top line. Now let's look at the rest of the page.

V = nxaxdB/dT

I interpret these symbols to be what I have written here. If I am correct, the two x's appear to indicate that the n, a, and dB/dT should be multiplied together. If the funny symbol between the x's is an a, then this equation is a specific case of Faraday's Law, which shows the magnitude of the voltage V generated by a magnetic induction changing with time, dB/dT, inside a constant area a. The n would be the number of coils in the wire

surrounding the constant area. There would normally be a minus sign before the n on the right side, and the use of a instead of A would be unusual, but not incorrect. The use of a might be a stretch, since Stan quite clearly writes a nice A in the expression immediately below this. But he also wrote a strange symbol for the fine structure constant, instead of the α. If this expression is Faraday's Law, I'm not sure how it fits in with the

rest of the page. If it is not Faraday's Law, then I don't know what it is. If V is a volume, as in the first line, then it probably is one that is shrinking, because of the last line on the page. The two x's cannot indicate a double

vector cross product, since V on the left side is a scalar, whether it is volume or voltage, and n should not be a vector. The first symbol on the last line could be interpreted as positronium, which is an electron (negative charge) and positron (positive charge) bound together and circling one another. The next symbol seems to indicate that they circle closer and closer, spiraling in toward one another, until they get close enough to become a black hole. This is stretching things a little bit; but I am trying to make sense out of the symbols and equal signs. The next term,

A → 4π(2GM/c²)²

Indicates to me that a spherical surface area is shrinking to the size of the surface area of a black hole, which is what the 4π(2GM/c²)² is. This might lead to a gravitational field dense enough for the creation of a wormhole,

shown by the two curved lines with the curly one in between, like the ones on Stan's other page.

At the bottom of the page the straight line with dots at each end, followed by the curved line, also with dots at the ends, are the same as on the first page. Again, these may indicate that flat space can be curved, so that one can travel quickly from one point to the other (i.e., from one dot to the other) through a wormhole.

Tony B. says:

{5. V=n.a.dB/dT =AC-Magnetic Flux Diagram)=A=4π(2GM/c²)²=Diagram

This is the interesting part. It derives the Biot-Savart Law for magnetism and links it to magnetic selfinduction in considering the fluxed area as the event horizon of a Black Hole.
Unification Physics derives:
E(selfinduction energy)=μ_oe²v²/8πR_e, for R_e the electronic radius.

Inductive energy; E(inductive)=½Li²=B²AR/2μ_o with integration of the Volume AR as 4πR²dR.

For a moving charge with velocity v:
B=μ_oev/4πR_e² (Biot-Savart)

As Inductance L: L=NBA/i=NA.μ_o(N/R)=μ_oN²A/R for area A per unitlength R, the Inductive Energy becomes in integrating from R_e to Infinity:  E(induction)=μ_oe²v²/8πR_e.

Now using A to be the Black Hole surface area as magnetic flux medium, gives this B as a Voltage V=N.a.dB/dT.

Magnetic Flux is measured in Tesla=Weber/Area=Joules/Ampere.Area=Voltage.Time/Area since Voltage=Energy/Charge=Energy.Time/Current=Action/Current.

Hence dB/dt in Tesla/Time=Voltage/Area and Voltage V=Area.dB/dt.

N is our quantumisation of Cooper charge as before and also the number of coils/windings of the magnetic induction field L=NBA/i.

The unification condition for the action law transforms the Biot Savart law into B=Mw/2c²R_u.

This formulation is independent of the charge q=Ne and the velocity of the charge-current.

The unification condition is 4πε_o=G_o, just as found in the esu units.

The difference is, that we here unify electromagnetism with gravitation and so equate 'potential charge' with 'potential mass'=gravitational mass, the latter transforming into inertial mass via the equivalence principle of general relativity and the monopolic electromagnetic string radiation.

One can see this in the PLO, which must crystallise this equivalence of e/c² with length as L_p√Alpha.

In SI units then: [Meter/Farad]=[Jm/C²] for 1/4πε_o and G has units [Nm²/kg²].

As the constants product must be unity by modular duality, we have:

[(Jm)²/(kg.C)²]=1 for Jm=kg.C=[kg.m²/s²] for cancelling mass with C=m³/s² as in the definition for the StarCoulomb and the magnetocharge.

But the PLO is like Stan Romanek's and Jack's L_p²L.

So we write [C]=[m.(m²/s²)] and the fundamental identities become e=PLO.c².

So PLO=e/c² unified and translating into 'Stoney-Units' as L_P√Alpha for a displacement given in the Planck-Length reduced in a factor of about 11.7.

Biot Savart now transforms B=μ_oev/4πR_e²in replacing the 'potential charge' 'e' with a 'potential mass' 'M' through the Alpha finestructures.

Alpha=2πe²/4πε_ohc and the G-Alpha=2πG_oM²/hc for (e/M)=√(4πε_oGo)=√(G_o/k)=1/√(k)²=1/k=G_o.

Using ε_o=1/120πc from the action law, we have M=e/G_o=e/4πε_o=30ec.

But 30ec are 30 monopole masses, each of energy c³ eV or 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV.

This shows, that all particle masses are derivatives of Cosmic Ray monopolic masses, themselves superstring derivatives.

But we substitute such a superstring (actually selfdual class IIB) mass into Biot Savart for the charge q=Ne=M/30c.

Also putting μ_o=120π/c and velocity v=wr we find:

B=(120π/c)(M/30c).(wr/4πr²)=Mw/c²r.

For the Cooper-pairings charge 'e' must be Coulombic e/2 and this shows up then in 2R_ec² defining the magnetocharge e* as the e↔e* mapping.

So Biot-Savart transforms into B=Mw/2c²R_u and R_u some unification radius in concentric shells.

So as example we compute the magnetic field for the earth.

This formula predicts that this B will not only change with depth but to depend on the spinrates of the shells under consideration.

We presume a core-mantle differentiation with equatorial radius of 6.4x10⁶ metres migrating to a core radius of say 1.2x10⁶ meters.

As the density increases towards the earth's centre we set Core-Mass=Core-Density.Core-Volume of say 9x10²² kg, reduced from the overall mass of so 6x10²⁴ kg as function of the density.

The earth's w=2π/Period=2πf=2π/3600.24)~1/13,751 revolutions per second.

Substituting gives B_earth as core-mantle differential (9x10²²)/{(13751)2c²x1.2x10⁶} or so 3x10^-5 Tesla.

Since 1 Tesla=10,000 gauss, the measured average of 0.3 gauss is obtained by this encompassing formulation, subject to perturbation methods.

The formula also works for other planets and also galaxies and clusters as function of their mass and rotation rates. For ionised media such as stars and say Jupiter and Neptune, Biot Savart is modified, as the charge substitution is related to emission/absorption of masses, such as plasma and the Solar Wind.

The formula so is most applicable for nonionised media.

Stan Romanek uses dB/dt, which is Constant.dv/dt with Constant=μ_oe/4πR_e² for the fundamental electron parameters in the generalised Biot-Savart.

But dv/dt=d(wr)/dt=2πR.df/dt.

One can so retain the current-mass relationship in dB/dt=(μ_oR(n)/2R_e))d(Nef)/dt and as a scaling of displacement relative to the electron scale R_e with a generalised wavelength 2πR(n) applied to the Space-Awareness as angular acceleration equivalent. The underpinning cyclic timeparameter is given in: n=H_ot with dn/dt=H_o as the minimum nodal Hubble frequency discussed elsewhere.

We can also use the velocity as a scaled de Broglie matter phase wave in V_dB=R(n)f.

Then dB/dt=(μ_oe/4πR_e²)dV_dB/dt leading to the same result as before for charge q=Ne.

The units must be applicable as Voltage/Area=Energy/Charge.Area=Energy/Current.Time.Area.

Now we know, that the Area under consideration must be quantum count of say Planck Areas in L_P², which define the surface area of Black Holes in the Holographic Principle of the dimensional embeddedments discussed elsewhere (see Bekenstein Bound, Hawking Entropy and Holographic Universe posts).

But Stan Romanek identifies this area quantisation as just this Black Hole Event Horizon count, given by the Schwarzschild Solution/Metric R_S=2GM/c².

In quantum relativity we have the Planck-Length (and so the area) magnified to the wormhole or Weyl-limit, and being quantised into the ubiquitous R_e as R_e=10¹⁰R_w(π/180).

PS.: The Newtonian ForceLaw extension (Alpha/MindForce relates to this via the wormhole perimeter (λ_w) definitions:

MagnetoCharge=Inverse Energy=e*, mapped as Volume.Awareness, Awareness being angular acceleration acting upon the quantised spacevolumars as the df/dt differential operator changing frequency in linearised time.
 

Hypnotic regression revealed advanced Alien Space and Time equations?

In down below video University of Nebraska and MIT physicists talks about advanced equations that somehow came through Stan Romanek while sleeping and while under hypnotic regression.

There have been well over 100 individually unique experiences that Stan has encountered since December of 2000 some of which remain unexplainable. Being abducted is only one of many experiences. There have been hundreds of witnesses for dozens of events that defy our current understanding of reality. Witnesses, photographs, videotapes, physical evidence, police reports and scientific analysis have confirmed the validity of these experiences beyond reasonable doubt. Scientists from top universities have been analyzing various aspects of this case for several years with amazing results.

The sheer volume of bizarre information, including highly sophisticated scientific equations pertaining to space travel and more, is creating quite a stir in the scientific community. Physicists talk about the equations. Unraveling what is likely the world's biggest unfolding mystery in the history of man is certain to revise our understanding of mankind and the complex universe we live in.



Abc recently interviewed Stan Romanek have look : Here

This equation was given to Stan during his first abduction experience. It came out when Stan was undergoing his first hypnotic regression in July, 2002. Included in the equation is a formula depicting a helium atom bombarding element 115., Element 115 at the time did not exist. It was years later when element 115 would be experimented with. Also included in the equation is a depiction of our solar system represented by ten dots and a circle. It wouldn't be until years later that scientists would discover a tenth planet in our solar system and name it, "Xenia" or "Planet X". At the end of Stan's writing is Drake's Equation, first devised by Dr. Frank Drake (now Professor Emeritus of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of California, Santa Cruz) in 1960, in an attempt to estimate the number of extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy with which humanity could potentially have contact. Somehow, with no prior knowledge of Drake's equation, Stan drew it and added, X 100, while under hypnosis!

Also Stan remembers getting this during his experience. The message was that something important is supposed to happen. The dots represent an alignment the planets, a date when this important event will unfold.
Not long after the correct date alignment diagram was given to Stan, an astronomer figured out the date from the alignment.

"I am an astronomer and a friend told me about Stan Romanek. The planet alignment is what fascinates me, so I decided to do some research on the Mystery Date. After a few weeks I thought this might all be made up. I came close but nothing to substantiate Stan's date. It was by accident that I hit the Zenith tab on my astronomy program while I was working on the date; suddenly everything came in to focus. I literally fell out of my chair! The date it self is even more impressive! Just to make sure, I have checked it with three different types of astronomy software, assuming a person is looking west from where Stan saw his UFO's it's all the same outcome. The impressive part about Stan's mystery date is the tenth planet (Xenia). Because there is not much known about the orbit of Xenia I hade to do some calculations with what was available, the Xenia alignment seems to fit in to Stan's mystery date. I must say I find this rather amazing, how did he know! There are better astronomers then myself, I hope they can shed some light on this just in case I am off on anything. The big date is September 21, 2012 Fall equinox." Scary!"I entered the date in my Star chart program and I got the same results. However, I have no data on the 10th planet, so I do not know it's position. Hopefully you will be able to confirm this or someone reading our posts can help. Here is the screenshot from my program. The program I am using is TheSky Student Edition by Software Bisque. The only difference is that on my program it is showing 9/21/2006 at 6PM, because my program showed Neptune just over the horizon at 5 PM. I also noticed that the stars are in similar patterns at 6PM on 9/20 and 9/22 in 2012. The time of 6 PM being significant because the Sun is in the right place at that time. This is great! We are very grateful and excited about your find!"
On September 3, 2002 upon waking, Stan's wife Lisa noticed that the alarm clock was upside down. They both noticed that there were pens, pencils and paper in and around the bed. It was then that Stan found this equation in his own handwriting lying next to him. Stan has no idea how he was able to draw the equation in total darkness and while asleep...
October 10, 2003 Stan drew this after a vivid dream. He drew it freehand in under a minute and has no idea how he drew it so straight and so quickly. Stan later tried to duplicate this and was unable to.August 20, 2004 During the regression when Stan was able to recall the corrected date, Stan also wrote this equation while under hypnosis.

August 17, 2005 Stan drew another equation in his sleep. Physicists are still working to understand these new equations and are very excited by what they are discovering.

February 28, 2006 Stan's wife Lisa witnessed Stan draw this equation in his sleep. They noticed that the word" Loop" was written backwards which indicated that the whole equation might also be written backwards. The equation was indeed backwards, a mirror was used to read the equation.September 28, 2006 Stan and Lisa had friends over to spend the night. In the early hours of the morning, Lisa awoke only to realize that Stan was drawing yet another equation. She immediately woke up their friend Don and they both witnessed Stan draw this equation. While completely asleep Stan was talking to an unseen presence in total darkness as he drew this equation.The strange writing at the bottom of this new equation was at first, unrecognizable.A researcher discovered that it was the word, "propulsion" written in an ancient form of Aramaic. The bottom of the equation reads, "Zero Point Propulsion."

This concludes this posting.

Tony B.