Hi Oswaldo!
Thank
you for your email.
I am unaware about any work of mine being found on Dan Winter's
website. Could you show me, where I am referenced?
I am not associated with either Dan
Winter or with some of the researchers he gives references to.
I know of Dan Winter
and his works, but find much of his approach confusing and too much aligned with commercial considerations.
His ideas on the platonic solids etc. are certainly on the right track, but encompass a manifesting physical
reality of patterns and geometrical structures, more so, then engaging truly elementary physics.
His
theories on gravity and fractals and so on, imo represent just a periphery about the elementary omni-physics, also engaging
modern string theories and such.
But your own searching for the connection between science
and spirituality in regards to sacred geometry is to be highly encouraged.
It is the
key in my research and it is because of certain conclusions, derived from my works, which perhaps enticed Dan Winters to associate
with those results.
The platonic solids are supersymmetric
geometrical constructions, which GIVE LIFE/ENERGY to particular SPIRITUAL ARCHETYPES.
This then can lead the interested student and researcher into a HOLISTIC PERCEPTION about the UNIVERSE REALISED.
The formula, you have mentioned is a famous equation in mathematics, known as the Euler-Identity.
It combines the transcental 'super-numbers' 'Pi' and 'e' with the complex plane
defined in abscissa x=-1 and ordinate y=+1i.
Then the pentagonal 'sacred geometry'
emerges from the quadratic x+y=1 upon substituting y=1/x as x.x+x=1.
This 'unification'
of the 'vector-space' with the geometric 'masternumbers' pervading mathematics, is the reason it is depicted
on the introductory website page.
The periodic
table of the elements follows a specific geometrical structure in the configuration of electronic energy levels and
is known as 'Aufbau Principle' for the 'Outer Atom'.
This forms
the basis for modern chemistry, using physical-mathematical principles.
What is not
well known, is that there exists a similar principle for the 'Inner Atom', which
links to the pentagonal supersymmetry in the formula for the 'Magic Numbers' and as n(n.n+5)/3.
The universe is not of the shape of either a classical- or a spherical
dodecahedron; but the sacred geometry embodied in the dodecahedron can be effectively used to holistically unify the supercluster
scales of about 400 million lightyears. The universe is best described as a 3-dimensional surface and as a metaphysical Black
Hole Event Horizon, and which encompasses an 'Inner Cosmology' in modular duality with a MIRRORED 'Outer Cosmology'.
The 'Inner Cosmology' becomes an 'open hyperbolically curved universe' and where the 3-dimensional
Friedmann model can be considered selftransformative into a 4-dimensional de Sitter model (this is part of the Haramein-Rauscher
cosmology also). The 'Outer Cosmology' so can UTILIZE its own Boundary Condition of the Event Horizon to CLOSE the
open universe in the addition of another spacial dimension.
Notice here, that the time parameter is excluded; the de Sitter cosmology attempts to describe a 5-dimensional
spacetime. This then is the topic of many 'popular topics', which expect a transformation
(or ascension) of the Minkowskian 4-D spacetime into its 5-D successor or prodigy.
Because the 'higher dimensional' universe permits you to 'collapse' or 'conifold' the
parameters of rotational quantum spin and vibrational quantum translation as a 6-dimensional (Calabi-Yau) manifold or as a
7-dimensional Joycian spacetime; the quantum nature of 3-D physical reality becomes the EFFECT of a 10-D metaphysical reality
of the old Riemann Universe of Einstein and LeMaitre, say as Poincare's 3-Sphere.
Now it is the INVARIANCE of the lightspeed parameter, which SEEDS this 10D Universe in ALL of its PHYSICAL
MEASUREMENTS.
So, for example, it takes about 100,000 years to travel across the
Milky Way's galactic disk at the speed of light.
This
then ABSOLUTELY restricts the physical universe in parameters of the lightpath, that is the transversion of finite space in
finite time.
However the metaphysical space remains
independent on the lightspeed, because it is defined in the (string) parameters, which CREATED spacetime as a quantum minimum
configuration in energy and in momentum.
So the 'uncollapsing' of one of the
string-dimensions, will allow you to USE the 'hard 4-dimensional' spacetime of the Minkowski metric as a CROSS-SECTION
for an encompassing de Sitter 5-dimensional spacetime - AFTER the Minkowski spacetime has RAPTURED and REGLUED itself (in
a Moebian Twist).
The 'hard' 4-dimensional
spacetime of physical reality will so become 'soft' and the restriction of the lightspeed can become modified or restructured
in an orthogonal 'Window' into a 5-dimensional Hyperspace (I recommend you read Michio Kaku's Hyperspace for an
easily digestible treatment).
I am so in
favour of the Haramein-Rauscher cosmology; another topic Dan Winter seems to have a great interest in.
The tetrahedron is best considered the basic platonic archetype for all of geometry.
In a 'flat' Euclidean spacetime, you can consider the VERTICES of the tetrahedra as the CONNECTOR-SPACES
or JUNCTION-POINTS to allow the (almost) instantaneous transmission of INFORMATION across the PHYSICALLY defined universe.
In a 'curved' Hyperspacetime, those vertices remain invariant, subject to the minimum energy quantum
configurations.
Dan Winter (and many others)
so are validated, in exploring the 'sacred geometry' in terms of their FRACTAL- and/or HOLOGRAPHIC properties.
To draw conclusions from those explorations, without incorporating the hypergeometric and multidimensional nature of the pentagonal
string however, can imo not only lead to incomplete cosmological models, but also to misinformation in regards to the general
populus.
The DNA, like the Platonic solids, represents
the PHYSICAL manifesto for its METAPHYSICAL encoding.
The DNA, especially as genetically
expressed in the human genome at the present time; is highly INSUFFICIENT, due to its SELFBLOCKING.
A lizard's severed tail can regrow under activation of its DNA archetype
and similarly the teeth of sharks and crocodiles are replenished.
The limbs of humans
do not regrow, though minimal substitution of 'missing' tissue has been achieved in some laboratories; showing you
that the inactive human DNA CAN become reactivated.
The
elementary structure of the DNA helix is not dodecahedral, but as is the case at the supercluster scale, the dodecas incorporate
the 'sacred number sequences' and so are subject of being inducted by them.
The
key to the human DNA is its 'magnetic inductability', located 'in between' the 'spiral staircases'.
You can consider groups of nucleotidal basepairings as being 'steps' between back-to-back pentagons, so forming longrange
translational and longrange rotational 'building blocks' in the form of decagons.
I hope I have answered your overall questions to some degree of detail.
You
are on the right road, leading to the New Rome, Oswaldo.
Hans Schatten
PS.: Due to its general relevance;
I have taken the liberty to publish your letter and this reply on the linked website and related forums.
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 2:42 AM
Subject: Letter from Spain
Hello, My name is Oswaldo and i´m peruvian writer living in Spain. Well,
my interest is in science and the spirituality around the world and the ages. I saw your information in the Dan Winter´s
web page. What Do you think about Dan´s work? What Do you think about the fractality / gravity theories? I really love
the Sacred Geometry but my aknowledment in sciences are very basics...sorry, when i saw formulas in your web page like this:
eiπ =XY=X+Y= i² =cos(π)+isin(π)
= -1
Hello, My name is Oswaldo
and i´m peruvian writer living in Spain. Well, my interest is in science and the spirituality around the world and the
ages. I saw your information in the Dan Winter´s web page. What Do you think about Dan´s work? What Do you think
about the fractality / gravity theories? I really love the Sacred Geometry but my aknowledment in sciences are very basics...sorry,
when i saw formulas in your web page like this: eiπ =XY=X+Y= i² =cos(π)+isin(π)
= -1
Hello, My name is Oswaldo and i´m peruvian writer living in Spain. Well,
my interest is in science and the spirituality around the world and the ages. I saw your information in the Dan Winter´s
web page. What Do you think about Dan´s work? What Do you think about the fractality / gravity theories? I really love
the Sacred Geometry but my aknowledment in sciences are very basics...sorry, when i saw formulas in your web page like this:
eiπ =XY=X+Y= i² =cos(π)+isin(π)
= -1
I
Think...”Ok, is mathematics but I don´t understand nothing...sorry...
The Table periodics of elements (Chemical) have relation with platonic solids?
Is the Dodecahedral
the shape of the universe?
Dodecahedral shape is fractal inself?
THE DNA is Dodecahedral? (Is the opinion of Dan works)
Tetraedral is
fractal?
We
have two types of fractality: one is about selreference and others is self reference in phi ?
Waht dou you
think about the work of Nassim Haramein?
Sorry but i have many questions...really sorry.
Warmly
Oswaldo
My Web page
is: www.oswaldor.com
But
is only in Spanish.
