>>-So this is my wished for "Odd Ball" EM's answer to "
Dark Energy" ?
>
Indeed,
the Dark Energy becomes the DIFFERENCE between the supercluster scale metric DEFINING the holographic universe on the level of isotropy and homogeneity (as an extremal Strominger Black Hole of the lower D) AND the encompassing Hubble-Bubble
(also as an extremal Strominger Black Hole, but of the higher D).Okay, forgive me for asking, and
I know better than to expect a short answer but I can always Pray on humbled knees...
I can get that we can have
a holographic universe this way, and in a variety of interpretations of the phrase, and that the, say 'internal projection(s)'
can be nice and "flat" on the 'inside' of something more like a sphere.
( universe as we know it )
However, is there, would there, be anything to expect from the ... "external" physical "spin"
er, "rotation" of the 'Strominger Black Hole' that is detectable 'on the inside', 'where we
are' ? ( It would be safer to bet on it spinning/rotating than not )
Worst case scenario this 'rotation'
plays out as a primal energy sustenance at one or more scales and therefore has a pervasive inside out effect in our world
and wouldn't be so much 'large scale structure'... ish...
( Or, not at all would be easier, but then missing
something... probably... )
Your query engages one of the most fundamental
questions of all: Why do things tend to rotate?
The 'electromagnetic envelope' as the 'higher-D' oscillatory-nodal
universe is in no manner separate from its 'lower-D' linear-time-entropic one.
But it is the addition of a single
perpendicular dimension to the mass-inertial universe, which allows the holographic universe to exist as a superposition of
the lower D's and the higher D's.
The lower D carries the information from the mass-inertia processing as the
well publisized 'Surface Area' of a Hawking-Mother-Black Hole (HMBH).
It is this HMBH, which as a 2-dimensional
'Data'-surface enables a 3-dimensional universe in space and a 4-dimensional universe in spacetime to exist.
General Relativity and the standard Friedmann-Walker-Einstein-leMaitre cosmology then describes this HMBH as a 3-dimensional
surface or as Riemann's Hypersphere (with three possible curvatures: hyperbolic-negative, Euclidean-flat and spherical-positive).
But there is more to it.
The surface dimension of the HMBH is FRACTAL to a higher-dimensional surface (aka the
Calabi-Yau toroidal manifolds) and so the 2-area dimension can become embedded in a 2+9=11-dimensional area dimension.
The 9 aditional 'higher' dimensions are like simple multiplication-magnification factors for the FRACTAL and miniaturised
HMBH.
So the discrete Planck-Area elements of Hawking become information units FRACTALISED and MAPPED or projected
onto the 11-D area of the Strominger envelope.
One can say, that the 3-dimensional universe does not exist, except
as 2-dimensional projection of SOURCE-information.
This projection is bidirectional.
The 2D-universe manifesting
as 3D space and 4D spacetime becomes UPPER BOUNDED AS a 10D asymptotic expansion BY a 11D information boundary, namely the
Strominger HMBH.
Corollarily however, the 11D-Information boundary is projected in its LOWER BOUND AS the 10D asymptotic
expansion.
This information exchange between two surface dimensions; namely the Hubble-Horizon of a 4-D spacetime expanding
universe AND the inflation-fixed asymptote for the Maximum expansion - so engages UNDEFINED SPACETIME, as the lightpath
between the two surfaces.
This is simply like a lightray reflected between mirrors in physical analogy.
The
UNDEFINED SPACETIME manifests the Dark Energy as the conductor between surface dimensions.
So the Dark Energy is defined
in coordinates, but not in mass-coupling - it is purely electromagnetic and gravitational in the preinertial sense.
So now to the nature of the quantum spin manifesting in fractal magnification as the rotation of things.
It's
a long story, but the genesis of the gauge universe required the definition of the gauge quantum spin as elementary ACTION.
Before gravity could become defined, a massless electromagnetic universe would exist in supersymmetry.
The first emergence
was a bifurcation of the unity between state and antistate; first in radiation coupled to antiradiation and secondly to an
energy template transforming the electromagnetic action selfstate into another selfstate, which can be called gravitational
inertia or GRAVITA.
As soon as the GRAVITA was defined via the Planck Action; the GRAVITA could reassign the previous
radiation-antiradiation coupling gauge to become GRAVITA-ANTIGRAVITA, the latter now known as INERTIA.
The GRAVITA-INERTIA
gauge coupling then gives Einstein's Equivalence principle, but shows that what is called mass represents a
transformation of the GRAVITA into INERTIA.
The point of all this is however that those transformations all require
the INDEPENDENCE of the coupling from linear translation, that is DISTANCE.
DISTANCE must be eliminated in the gauge
coupling and this is achieved in ANGULAR VELOCITY becoming independent of the radius as a function of FREQUENCY (angular velocity
w=2πf, v=wr, centripetal acceleration ac =v2/r for tangential velocity v etc).
So GRAVITA
exists as a consequence of antiparallel gauge rotations aka quantum spin induced into the GRAVITA electromagnetic (massindependent)
precursor.
One can then sum all quantum spins in the universe to reattain the bosonic 0-spin eigenstate of the
primordial radiation-antiradiation gauge coupling.
This means the GRAVITA-INERTIA-universe in total does not rotate and
has no preferred directions.
There is a dilemma however.
Reducing the material quantum universe
to its constituent parts gives the Higgs Boson blueprint of zero-spin and from whom all mass-carriers emerged in fermionic-bosonic
supersymmetries.
As matter is up-spin (fermionic halfspin) polarised to generate say a lefthanded neutron decaying
into a lefthanded proton, a righthanded electron antineutrino with a lefthanded electron under the gauge function of a righthanded
W-minus boson of fullspin the NONAPPEARANCE or VIRTUAL NATURE of the weakon gauge must be accounted for.
Iow, where
does the lefthanded neutron come from if the weakon does not exist in reality?
The Higgs Boson would solve the dilemma,
if it would produce a righthanded antineutron with analogous decay products and a corresponding leftpolarised W-plus weakon.
You may see here, where the solution to the nonparity between matter and antimatter lies.
The Higgs Boson does
not exist as an independent particle, as its existence would imply the existence of the AntiHiggs in an observed matter-antimatter
symmetry.
The matter-antimatter symmetry, which relies ultimately on the quantum spin, NEVER existed as precursor
for the Higgs Boson and its antipartner.
What did exist was a SUPPRESSION of the antistate in the form of antiradiation,
i.e. the ANTIPHOTON gauge.
The coupling between photon and antiphoton allowed the matter-antimatter fermionic coupling
as a bosonic bifurcation intoo the fermionic selfstates of neutrino-antineutrino, quark-antiquark, matter-antimatter
etc.
But as soon as the fermionic selfstate was defined, both, the antiphoton and the antimatter could become suppressed
in favour of the GRAVITA-INERTIA transformation.
IN OTHER WORDS, the GRAVITATIONAL MASS EQUIVALENCE became the
missing antimatter.
One day it will be rigorously proven, that the inherent supersymmetry in the universe derives
from a coupling between the GRAVITA and the INERTIA; the former a displacement independent energy and the latter described
by the laws of relativity under c-invariance.
Now the antiradiation gauge is suppressed, but still present as the
virtuality of the weak interaction gauges (coupled to fermionic inertia carriers as Higgs Boson derivatives).
So
the antiradiation gauge spin contributes to the overall total spin of the coupled universes (high D and low D).
And
as those universes are inextricably interwoven the overall spin eigenstate must be zero, but can fluctuate in the finestructures
of the 10-dimensional spacetime (only the 4D spacetime coupled to say conifolded/collapsed Calabi-Yau toruses couples to INERTIA
- the Dark Energy defines the GRAVITA as gravitational but not as inertial (luminous)).
And because the ratio between
the inertial lower D and the gravitational higher D is set at the inflaton as the massratio between the respective HMBHs (2.8%)
and which is so also the hyperacceleration ratio between the socalled Einstein-Lambda and the de Broglie inflation acceleration;
this MISSING ENERGY becomes subject to the universes's SELFEVOLUTION.
This self evolution, defined in the 'Dark
Energy' as GRAVITA and antimatter substitute reduces physically to the parameter of ANGULAR ACCELERATION, independent
on distance, but as a frequency differential operator acting linearly on time, but being intrinsically the SOURCEFREQUENCY
of the gauge photon on the form of df/dt=fmax2.
So why do things like Black Holes,
galaxies and stars and planets and moons NATURALLY ROTATE?
The lower D INERTIA universe MUST conserve angular momentum
with the higher D GRAVITA universe in a MIRRORED SUPERSYMMETRY, independent of translational displacement, but as function
of the quantum angular spin, aka UNIVERSAL SELFCONSCIOUSNESS.
More details are found in many previous
postings.
Khaibit
>>-I have to bite the bullet and go a little
extra-dimensional ?
>Just a little. The zillion string solutions
do in fact reduce to a single one; should the pundits realise that the heterotic symmetry E8 actually MAGNIFIES the planck scale by a factor of 10 trillion to the 1000 TeV energy level."I
must have missed 60 minutes"
-Hans Grueber
So... There is a simple "lensing" one can
do mathematically to zero-in ? Or the E8 is flawed ? Or it needs to do that, just has to be... "restructured"
after all is said and done ?
Sounds like a paper in the making for sure on that one.
Wow...
That was ALMOST complete
I need some time to formulate a further question when it comes to the Anti-Higgs
Boson issue(s) to be sure.
Reminder to self: Did that particular description of "where the anti-higgs
went hit the right target." Something bugged me.
Not the principle, but the specifics
Specifically,
the Higgs Boson is NOT a particle, but a particle template as the parent of all inertia carrying fermions.
So PART of
the Higgs Boson is an electron, part is a proton and parts are the quarks.
Particularly the Higgs Boson template becomes
a DOUBLE-NEUTRON (or a Lambda-Hyperon in the SU(3) Unitary Symmetry of the Standard Model).
This is very important as
the Standard Model Unitary Symmetries, say the SU(1)xSU(2)xSU(3) becomes comprehensively encompassed and accomodated by the
Double-Neutron Boson of 0-quantum spin.
Only because the MASSLESS Double-Neutron template aka the Higgs Boson has 0
spin, CAN the matter-antimatter symmetry crystallize in the Vacuum of the Heisenberg metric background.
This can
be modeled in gluonic colourcharges YYCCMM(0)=YCM(+1/2)+YCM(-1/2).
But as YCM=CMY=MYC defines matter and the anticyclic
MCY=CYM=YMC defines antimatter; the Higgs Boson is sufficient to manifest the antimatter in the vacuum (via pair-production)
BUT SUPPRESSES NATURALLY occurring antimatter.
{This is possible, because the YCM+MCY coupling gives a mesonic quark-antiquark
colour-anticolour mixing of the form: BYYB=RCCR=GMMG, which by nature of colour-anticolour coupling remains supersymmetric
between matter and antimatter and characterising the Mesons in the standard model}.
The Higgs Boson so describes
a double-neutron boson, whilst the antiHiggs Boson would become MMCCYY(0) as a double-antineutron.
The antiHiggs
Boson so is rendered superfluous in the supersymmetry, as the antimatter scenario is validated in the Heisenberg vacuum (of
the virtuality of the gauges of the SU(3)xSU(2)xSU(1) unitary symmetry), BUT no gauge interaction between antimatter constituents
occurs due to the Higgs Bsonic RestmassInduction rendering the GRAVITA inertial.
There are certain energy levels described
by a prior superstring transformation (the XL-Boson at the 1015 GeV level bifurcating into the quark-lepton families
of the standard model {tauon, muon,electron---triplet-top,doublet-bottom,singlet-charm}; which transform this GRAVITA stringenergy
into the familiar 1 GeV energy level of the baryon masses.
The common neutron so IS HALF a Higgs Boson and leftpolarised
in weakon coupling.
The weak interactions (say beta minus decay of the neutron in all of radioactivity) so become CP-symmetry
violated because the 'other half of the dineutron' manifests as a righthanded neutron which DOES NOT partake in the
weak interaction because of the Higgsian template definitions.
The righthandedness of the neutron is the mirror
image of the lefthanded Wplus weakon coupling characteristic for antimatter in the form of the antineutron's beta-plus
decay.
But the latter is suppressed, rendering the existence of the antiHiggs template unnecessary.
John
Shadow
Okay, here is what has been bugging me:
-----------------------------------------
You may see here, where the solution to the nonparity between matter and antimatter lies.
The
Higgs Boson does not exist as an independent particle, as its existence would imply the existence of the AntiHiggs in an observed
matter-antimatter symmetry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is totally cool, I totally love it, and at least a few, and perhaps LARGE steps beyond what I've been
thinking here.
In your follow up, you zeroed-in on the double-neutron, and double-anti-neutron, which to me is
an odd choice starting from ( go all the way back to principles of electro-weak unification )
You'd think first
there'd be "electron" in some similar mechanics as you are describing, and arrive into neutron / atom space
a little later on down the line.
What am I missing about electrons-first ?
Simple; the
electron is charge polarised, whilst the neutron is not.
So the Higgs derivative/precursor must be charge-neutral and
define a 'particle' which decays into opposite charges (charge positive of the proton with anticharge negative of
the electron in the conventional labeling).
Btw, the 'Double-Lambda' would decay into a Neutron-pair with
gamma photons or a proton-pair with negative pion meson pairings.
But the neutron as a particle is also just a
label.
Remember that the dineutron is BOSONIC and MASSLESS (as a YLEM String-photon say) in my description.
It is not the baryonic nucleon of the textbooks.
It is more of a SUPERSTRING; massless and of an energy 1000 trillion
times greater than the neutros in your body. But its template BECOMES manifested in Higgs MassInduction AS a pair of neutrons,
one righthanded and the other lefthanded.
It is precisely the mass induction which transforms the huge string energy
down to the level of the nucleon physics (by a factor of so 1013).
Only the lefthanded one partakes in the
weak interaction; showing from first principles why the cosmic antimatter is suppressed in gauge coupling.
You
should realise, that the weak interaction is the only fundamental interaction which occurred AFTER Inflation and is so THE
fundamental interaction defining the nature of Inertia in the nature of the weakon gauges.; as well as the energy transductions
from bosonic strings to fermionic 'particles'.
The weakons are massless as leptonic bosons (coupling electrons,
muons and tauons to their antineutrinos for the Wminus's and also antineutrinos to each other [for the Zo's])
BUT become massive via the massless Higgs precursor (itself the 0-spin ancestor the RestMassPhoton or RMP(-1)) transforming
the GRAVITA into the measured INERTIA (as the masses of the elementary particles).
John Shadow
So...
Primarily "space" is simply on or about 'electro-magnetic' until we get sub-atomic...
-Yes, space, time, mass etc all blend on the string scales in terms of quantum energy, upper-limited by the Planck-Length
and lower-bounded by the magnified Planck-Length (the Weyl-String E8 also called Wolford center by our friend).
All
measurements of distance are electro-magnetic because there's no way we 'actually' measure it otherwise...
-Yes, to measure distance, the lightparameter in the form of the lightpath X=ct is invoked, relative to some
arbitrary standard 'ruler', depending on mensuration units.
And it is the bonding of electrons
around atoms that makes things interesting, and that's how electrons
participate in the effect of gravity...
and likely we don't have to worry about neutrino's giving a hoot
about gravity until/unless they interact ?
- The neutrino issue is rather complex, as they are very important in unifying the strong interaction with the
weak interaction in electroweak strong coupling between the gluons and the leptonic ring-structures.
Imagine a pebble
dropped into a still pond.
When the pebble hits the surface, the indentation defines the interacting Weyl-String
area as the 'size' of both a gluon and an antineutrino (matter is coupled to antineutrinos and antimatter is always
coupled to neutrinos).
The concentric wavefronts caused by the pebble are like a ringstructure for the Higgs template
accomodating all bosons and all fermions in existence.
Firstly there is the KERNEL (of the Weyl-Center) defining the
FIRST FAMILY of the up-down quarks with the so called POINTPARTICLE ELECTRON of classical quantum field theory.
Secondly
there is an INNER MESONIC RING defining the SECOND FAMILY of the charm-strange quarks with the POINTPARTICLE ELECTRON
at the MUON-ENERGY LEVEL.
Thirdly there is an OUTER LEPTONIC RING defining the THIRD FAMILY of the bottom-top quarks
with the POINTPARTICLE ELECTRON at the TAUON-ENERGY LEVEL.
You have the three families because of the QUANTUM
GEOMETRY of this POINT-ELECTRON manifesting as the CLASSICAL ELECTRON at precisely the geometric scale of the Higgs Boson
and the LEPTONIC RING at so 3 fermi.
This 'size' is also the size of the charged weakons (W+ and W- ; the Zo
is the size of the Weyl-Center as doubled neutrinos).
Then the electroweak unification engages the Weyl-Center in an
interaction between the gauge photon of EMR and the antineutrino (both of the same scale). But because the electron's
antineutrino is part of the W- template (the size of the Higgs Boson and decaying into an electron with its antineutrino)
the POINTELECTRON becomes the CLASSICAL ELECTRON and so the electroweak unification occurs via the exchange of a 'virtual'
W-.
But the gluon interacts with the antineutrino in a strongweak coupling without the gauge photon and so the
transformation of a gluon with a neutral Zo weakon would unify the nuclear interactions on the primal level.
This however requires TWO antineutrinos to negate the integral spin of the Zo and again the Higgs Boson mastertemplate
must be YYCCMM+RRRRGGGGBBBB (because a single antineutrino is RRGGBB(+1/2) quantum geometrically.
This is part of the
reason the pundits search for a (unnecessary) supersymmetry and SUSY particles with integral spinning antineutrinos as fermions
and halfspinning bosons. So what happens, is that the oscillating ringstructure changes energylevels between KERNEL
and MESONIC RING and LEPTONIC RING in the MANIFESTATION of the POINTPARTICLE ELECTRON becoming CLASSICAL.
As
Mac would say, the electron of Quantum-Field-Theory is required to have a finite size in the Classical Electron, yet QED requires
it to be structureless to a distance not greater than 1/1000th of a fermi.
The scenario above explains the situation
and justifies both QFT and QED in their mutual extensions.
So you find the down-quark at the Mesonic Ring level OSCILLATING
into the strange-quark at the Leptonic Ring AS a FULL -1 electron charged 'quantum ring'.
This changing of the
quantum structure of the electron then manifests as the elementary interactions between the elementary 'forces'.
But, as you can easily ascertain, the down-quark has a charge -1/3, meaning that there must be a +2/3 KERNEL charge somewhere
in its structure.
This structure is the up-quark as a trisected KERNEL charge (+2/3+2/3+2/3=+2).
To incorporate
gravity so requires an additional Kernel-gauge agent and this is what is called Graviton.
The Graviton is however ALWAYS
already UNIFIED with the Gauge photon in a longrange gravito-electromagnetic coupling LINKED to the suppressed precursor of
the Higgs Boson (this is the gauge antiphoton,...and with it the weakon derivatives).
So it is futile to search
for the Graviton OUTSIDE the nucleus; it ALWAYS resides within the KERNEL as the interaction medium for the Antineutrino of
the weak interaction and the gluon of the strong interaction and the gauge photon of the electromagnetic interaction.
Iow,
all of the 4 fundamental gauge agents are really the same 'particle' in an ongoing transformation. The quantum colour
charges and descriptions are: Strong Gluon: RGB[+1]; Weak Antiphoton: BGR[+1]; EMR Photon: RGB[+1]; Graviton: BGR[-2]; RMP:
YYCCMM[-1].
The above will one day revolutionise the understanding of unification physics (but the time is
not yet).
But you might see, that the origin of the physical universe in gauge terms relies on the
RMP=RestMassPhoton as a spininduced Higgs Boson. EMR and Gravity neutralise each other in colour charge (RGB+BGR=(RB)GG(BR)=MGGM=Meson
quark-antiquark doublet SU(2); BUT do not neutralise in quantum spin (+1-2=-1). Additionally, the longrange spin-disparity
is complemented by an opposing shortrange spin-disparity betweeen the inertia-coupled antiphoton and the gluon in MGGM[+2].
This then is the reason for the decoupling of the 4 elementary interactions in the first place. The longrange interactions
(emr and gravity) are neutralised in colour-charges (or magnetic gluon charges) by the shortrange nuclear interactions BUT
require a FIFTH interaction to 'correct' the quantum spin imbalance -1+2=+1.
In gauge terms then, this
MUST generate a 'missing energy' template which carries a -1 quantum spin. The missing energy is then labeled as 'dark
matter', dark energy, axion, WIMP, SUSY particle or what have you.
But the simplicity is found in the
SUPPRESSION of the antiphoton and the antimatter described earlier. Because the supersymmetry is suppressed, the COUPLING
between INERTIA-MASS and GRAVITA-PHOTONMASS becomes possible. So an appropriate label for the 'missing energy' is
simply RMP=RestMassPhoton as the gauge of the unifying interaction.
You might witness, that the blueprint of the RMP
is precisely that of the Higgs Boson - albeit with quantum spin -1 and not scalar (0) as in the Higgs.
The searched for
Higgs Boson is a Goldstone Boson and MASSLESS as a SCALAR 0-spinning gauge. It is simply the scalar RMP.
Associating
ANY mass with the Higgs Boson simply generates the energy levels with certain peaks at the Kernel-InnerRing-OuterRing structure
of itself.
Adding two neutralising weakons in W-+W+ ~161 Gev as well as the vacuum expectation (adding all the energy
levels up to, but excluding the top-level together) in 81 GeV, as well as the Fermi-Energy of the electroweak coupling
in 284 GeV; will give such 'peak values' and as have been amply observed, measured and demonstarated in the literature.
So the upper Higgs Mass is a DoubleStrange quark level at about 1.1 TeV and the lower Higgs Mass is that of the
weakon scale at 81 GeV (W+-) and 91 GeV (Zo).
So rendering the massinduced 'particles' massless again,
will REUNIFY all of the gauges and reform the plenum of energy from which all derived before space and time existed. This
process you can easily retrace with the information given above.
But mass exists and is in a constant flux of transformation
between energy selfstates.
So do all the other little inner doodads have a different notion of distance
?
-No, the displacement scales are those of the POINTELECTRON transforming into the asymptotic nuclear
confinement limit of the CLASSICAL ELECTRON.
And the macroscopic can be left completely EM ?
-Yes, the longrange action begins at that of the Classical Electron radius.
The "distance"
problem is more directly or entirely related to non-electrons ?
-There is no distance problem; except specifying
the scale where the physical measurement units change into each other. This is thought by string theory to be the Planck-Length;
but is modified (and guessed at by researchers like Ng and VanDam) to a magnified scale, which here is termed the Weyl-Scale.
This extended treatise on the quantum geometry of unification physics might have answered your query. There
is much more detail to be added and I shall clarify any issues.
John Shadow
