The Key to Interdimensional Physics post 2012

The key is the tetrahedral basic geometry; then emerging into the Platonic shapes and from there into the manifested universe on all fractal and holographic scales.
The interdimensional physics is just that, interdimensional.
Just like the 3% of the human genome required to manifest the morphogenetics is supplemented by 97% of 'junk-DNA' seemingly serving no physical purpose (say coding for proteins from amino acid nucleotidal bases or any other biochemically measurable substance interaction); so is the basic physical structure of the H2O molecule related 97% to physically UNOBSERVABLE processing of information.
The 3% of the physicality of water describe the understood physics, say molecular and solid-liquid-vapour phase-state interactions.

James Randi and co are emotionally engaged in those 3%, but interfere EMOTIONALLY with the 97%. Overall, James Randi has as much credibility with me, as does the (catholic) pope with regards to knowing the 'real' Jesus of Nazareth - cumulative 3%.

The densification of water vapor is related to dimensional dedensification (or openining) and therefore the association of the 4th spacial dimension with UFO phenomena and the parousia of the 'coming in clouds'.

JS

( WARNING, watch the video first, it is inspiring )

However...

It is disappointing that they are not discussing the experimental details, just supposed results attributed to (x).

There was an interesting example of this topic which involved the amazing James Randy, who, upon visiting a French Lab claiming water memory of homeopathic investigation... the experiments suddenly failed when Randy introduced the Double Blind factor to the experimental process.

Two things, 1) I was very happy to see Randy add this added logic, 2) I was disappointed that
further investigation was not done to further "count" the results without the double blind...

Because there was an electronic counter involved...
( if there is an effect attributed to the water, it could be rather The Experimenter, Or, The Experimenter in the continued act of observation of (x), etc., ... )

And somebody dropped the ball because there appeared to be "the signal" of "if somebody watches it the whole time, then the counter counts more..." whereas, double-blind, the counter doesn't go off as much...

So... I am still stuck in this same place on this issue. Randy provided a powerful whap up-side the head here, and this video, though interesting, generally, is not giving me a start to finish 'experiment' to analyze and "verify".

Great... Show me more... the whole thing, pick one experiment and let's tweak it and find out if
we ourselves are not truly the active principle.

The "fish" was good... but, show the control group, and repeat... please... with the same light and video-ing of the groups... and personal attention. Fish react to people... So, the behavior of the observer... is significant. Science eliminates all possible "other" reasons for "effects".

The oil separation is interesting, but, was it really Heat ? Or vibration ? Or something else ?
And here, it wasn't "happy thoughts" that did it, it was, they said, Radiation ! So I fail, actually, to see how that one even fits !!!

I am not trying to be negative, water is great.

Presentation of Science can ... BE BETTER !