|
WHERE IS THE GOD OF SCIENCE ?
Or
The Death of
the Supernaturality Virus !
“
A BOOK OF LIFE AND DEATH “
INTRODUCTION AND DISCLAIMER:
This essay shall
take the form of a dialogue between two philosophers and as a play of words in seven acts.
A claim to have some answers to pertinent and profound questions in regards
to the perennial quest of the human race to understand itself in being and in mind can be no statement of whimsicality.
Such a proposition demands a thorough investigation
of the issues at hand; not a onesided or biased examination of selected data and information; but a rigorous scientific approach
to evaluate all the evidence supplied in the history of the developments, both in the popular culture and its science and the philosophies supporting it.
It is of limited value to parade the scientific
discipline as the rational and impartial paradigm for the future; if that same worldview proves itself incapable to elucidate
or to explain the most basic of elementary questions asked or problems faced by the now globalised citizenship, placing its
hope and expectation into that same projected future. And the overwhelming problem facing mankind at the beginning of the
21st century is that of its own philosophy.
‘Where are we now as a race?’, ‘Where are we going ?’ and ‘Where did we
come from?’ are some common questions asked, but not answered by the expert authorities in organized politics, science, culture and
religion.
Why do we seem incapable, despite
having built a monumental edifice called the scientific way and methodology; and notwithstanding the progressing
technology derived from that; why then can that same worldview not answer a simple
question like: “If there is such a thing as God, as so many of us have been told, then where and what is it?”
We find an evolved human genetic disposition
to form allegiances and to carry and ascribe to certain beliefs, often founded or exposited upon by certain individuals or
groups. Kings and knights, magicians, clerics and sages of old have transformed into the experts and advisors of the new.
Consultancy has become the catch-phrase,
often stifling the natural curiousity to find answers for one’s own questions in a denial of one’s own creative
impulses through an adventure of self-discovery.
Today, we find allegiances
to political ideologies, religious dogmas or some other culturally based agenda. All those liaisons and associations have
something in common however; they all become coloured in the individuals which belong to them. Redemption from this filtered
state of affairs is found in a paradigm which is based on the precept of disallowing personality to individualize the work
to be done or to colour the information to be collected as one’s personal archive or one’s private library of
creation, subject to one’s own individual fancies and desires.
Albert Einstein once remarked: “The greatest trouble in the world is the
idea of a personal God!”
And so one might agree with the
depersonalization of Albert Einstein’s ‘God’, whom he rather affectionately called: "The
Old One” and of whom he also said: “God
does not play dice with the world”, referring to his rejection of the idea that life
and nature’s processes are intrinsically arbitrary in an universe defined by chance and random events.
1
He thought of ‘God’ as
being the intelligence behind the natural laws of nature, as found in the sciences and the mathematics which he studied and
he believed that nature had to be based in geometrical principles, rather than in probabilities defined in statistics and
stochastic matrices.
And there were others before and after him; Plato
and Aristotle, upon whose dialogues this treatise is based; Pythagoras, the Greek geometers and Niels Bohr, Max Planck and
Werner Heisenberg, all contemporaries of Albert Einstein with Paul Dirac, Max Born and Wolfgang Pauli in their contributions
to the birth of quantum mechanics.
The symmetries in nature, numbers
and sequences and fundamental constants; all seem fine tuned and set into relationships with one another to create the universe
and all the cosmological entities within it.
And one should not forget another genius of contemporary
science in Isaac Newton.
But
what the modern world has tried to forget and to sequester away under an umbrella of a perceived historical ignorance,
was the immense interest Isaac Newton, the father of all of classical mechanics, had in the concepts of religion.
And what is the modern moral evaluation
by his peers, judging a man whom they portray to the students of science as having had no equal in his time in regards to
his scientific work, inventions and mathematical insights?
His power of pure intellect,
like Einstein’s, is often used to exemplify the necessity for logical thought and concentration in the pursuit of scientific
and mathematical excellence by the students in those fields. Is it embarrassing to tell the full story; that Isaac Newton
spent months at a time trying to decipher scrolls, like the ‘Book of Daniel’ and the ‘Book of Revelation’
in the bible? “He must have been deluded in the religious fervor
of his age!”, they would have
said.
But was he?
Could a mathematical prodigy like Isaac Newton have been so gullible? Isn’t it more likely, that he sensed that there was something to it
– and that it had to be scientific?! Isaac Newton’s ‘God’ is the same as Albert Einstein’s
‘God’ and yet it is completely impersonal. It must be, by the definition of the working
ethic!
But is it?
Could it be possible, that once the ‘God of Science’ has become totally
impersonal, that then this same ‘God’ is reborn in a ‘God of OmniScience’, who allows, even demands
a personification, because of its own definition?
And what if that had been the masterplan
throughout the ages anyway? Can we then ever know
and understand such a masterplan?
And what if all the clerical authorities around the globe
are forced by their own followers to take notice?
What
if modern science can prove to them that their ‘Allah’ and ‘Jehovah’ and Yahwhey and ‘Brahma’
and ‘Baha’ and ‘Krishna’ and ‘Ra’ and ‘Osiris’ and ‘Set’ and ‘The
Big Goat behind the Old Oaken Tree in the Walpurgisnacht on April 30th , are all one and the same?
What
if their scriptures and ancient scrolls became illumined in a new light of omniscience; should their powerbase not become
depersonalized, if they are shown to have followed a very limited interpretation of their ‘sacred texts’ indeed?
Where would they go in their
grandstanding of and about ‘God’s Law’ for the ‘chosen people’ and for the ‘infidels’?
It would be the end of falsified religious dogma and the death of manipulative religion as such.
Because omniscience is Omni-Science, the Science of ‘The All’
for ‘The All’ and the German word for the cosmos or
the universe is “Das ALL” - Albert Einstein and Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli and Max Born would have liked that in
their contemplations upon the natural order of things.
2
Albert Einstein also said: “Science without Religion is lame and Religion without
Science is blind” - and this book shall try to synergise the two worldviews
in a redefinition of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and its statistical nature within a geometrical
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
And then would peace between the nations have a
chance, because of the demise of the old religions and the already internationally accepted profundity of the scientific way
and methodology.
Like music, dance or mathematics,
a new language would sweep the old world of hate and dispossession, the ways of disempowerment and disbelief under the carpet
of the illumination of a new base of knowledge.
A new song would
be sung and the nations and tribes and families at war with each other could embrace one another in a new way of looking at
the world around themselves and their individuated places within it.
And all the many things they
had learned from their history through the ages of humankind; all their legends, myths and fables, their religions and their
sciences; all would become integrated within themselves in a renewed understanding and the death of their ignorance regarding
themselves.
But to succeed, the initiation of this omniscience
is first required to effect its own birthing process.
The mathematical principles of
necessity and sufficiency must be satisfied and the scientific global community must become informed about the new dispensation.
The premises of the new model also necessitate their scientific validation through experiment and
verification in the collective scientific data base.
This then is the
disclaimer for this play of words.
To scientifically empower the
new dispensation; a scientifically rigorous approach in its elementary application cannot be avoided.
Science cannot ‘prove’ something, without clearly identifying its parameters and boundary conditions.
There is an abundance
of literature, which explains the present status quo in the specialized fields of particle physics, quantum theory, unification
physics and cosmology in a populist genre of communication.
Many discoveries add to that
edifice on a daily basis. This treatise then does not retell the stories, which have already been told in many other ways
and media.
A list of references points to supportive accounts of some popular ones
amongst them.
This essay attempts to explain the fundamentals, the principles and
preconditions for what brought about the universe’s
occurrence and the parameters which led to its definition in the natural laws.
And it is happenstance, that those precepts and prerequisites existing before space and time came into being, have
a relevance for the birth of the religions of history or what one could term the ‘spiritual impulse’.
The bearing upon the personality is found to be a subset
of a collective psyche; what one might perceive as the groupmind of a race or species; a somewhat very unique genus, which
despite the relativity of the observer and the heliocentric reality – finds itself at the center of the universe, as
itself – the race of mankind!
3
The story is told
in a dialogue of two grand experts in the fields of science; both exponents of the art form, but also in possession of academic
qualifications in theology and comparative religion.
They discuss how the story of
science could be told to a largely mathematically illiterate populace.
And because
of their expertise in the fields of religious studies and their ancient histories; they fluctuate in their discussions between
a highly scientific form of expression and the semantics of a more popular tradition, often using the similes of mythological
metaphor and imagery.
That context is given as a percentage indicator at the beginning of each act.
One Robert
Sceptico of Jones has a genealogical
lineage tracing back to Celtic blood, which culminates in the anglosaxon culture of colonized
Northern America and the state of Michigan in the USA. His anglosaxon heritage is however a derivative from the most ancient bloodline of the House of Ahriman Azurguya, in the Genesis of the starhuman species in the civilization of Mesopotamia of the year 2244 BC.
Robert Sceptico is an adherent
to the divisionist school of science; progress and advancement are achieved in an organized approach to structure and the
application of the scientific method in the testing and subsequent validation or falsification of proposed models and hypotheses.
Robert
Sceptico’s science is one of order and compartments; things are in their place and separated by form and in substance;
yet are unified in the symmetries of quantum geometry via quantum relativistic principles applied to the smallest particles
found in nature in the realm of the subatomic quarks and leptons.
Robert Sceptico is a renown
world authority on the 12-dimensional CMF-theory of supermembranes and is a visiting professor in the physics departments
of universities around the world.
One Logan Antico of Arndale has a genetic inheritance tracing back to Celtic bloodlines and which culminate in the
anglosaxon culture of colonized Australia and the state of Victoria. His Celtic lineage derives however from the most ancient blood of the House of Adaman Azurguya, in the manifesto of the starhuman race in the civilization
of Mesopotamia of the year 2244 BC.
Logan Antico
is a proponent for the unifying school of science; progress and advancements are made in an organized approach to structure
and the application of the scientific methodology in the testing of hypotheses and their experimental validation or rejection.
Logan Antico’s science is one of order and of symmetry; things are
found separated in space and in time; yet are unified in a holographic mode of operation, based on the energetic dynamics
of principles in quantum relativity and in the quantum geometry of the largest particles found in nature in the form of galaxies
and their cosmological origins as white-hole-sources and as black-hole-sinks, operating as a dyadic vortex system of duality.
Logan Antico is a renown world authority
on cosmology and the structure of the omniverse as a collection of universes and is a visiting professor in the cosmology
departments of universities around the globe.
The ultimate aim of science to unify all aspects
of existence so becomes a quest to enhance all energy and matter towards their most basic and elementary form of manifestation.
Once such a fundamental oneness
is found and classified by science; then the scientific worldview will become enabled to crossfertilize all its interdisciplinary
factions and the global culture will be ready to purge itself from all unscientific and irrationally derived paradigms and
belief systems.
That will be the death of superstition and of pseudoscience; the unscientific
way of thinking and its many flawed perceptions in regards to observed natural phenomena.
Both Robert Sceptico and Logan Antico hold professorships in theology and comparative religion, and both are initiates
to the mythologies of ancient thought and the gnostic interpretations of the Dead-Sea-Scrolls and the documents of Nag Hammadi.
And both hold the Einstein-Chair of Quantum Relativity in the Department of OmniScience at the University
of New Alexandria. Their professional status is that of Doctor of the Perennial Philosophy (PPhD).
4
ACT ONE: IDENTITY , ANTIIDENTITY AND A SUPERMEMBRANE
Who am I ? &
Qui va la` ? & Tangos dance a tea for two in one !
(Scientific Expert: 35% versus Lay Philosopher: 65%)
[Robert
Sceptico and Logan Antico meet at ‘The Wanderer’, the local tavern for a beer or two and to continue a discussion
begun on campus in the form of a question, posed by a shared student, familiar with concepts in both the fields of cosmology
and in quantum physics.]
Robert Sceptico:“An interesting question isn’t it. “Where
is the God of Science?”; so naive and yet profound, indeed what should one answer to that?” Could one say that there cannot be a ‘God’
undefined by science or that whatever concept one might have of such a thing, it must be rooted in mathematical abstraction
and in the concept of a ‘naked singularity’ - the quantum of space and time itself?”
Logan Antico:“It’s a question of semantics Robert. Because
all students of life carry their own filters in the form of their brains and their sensory based memories of their experiences;
it is their comparative analysis, which must label all perceptions in individuated frames of references. So what good is it,
if you can say in full knowledge of the fact, that the idea of ‘God’ rests in a mathematical singularity which can be defined in a spacetime of cardinality Aleph-Null, but which can manifest as a heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)
and a wormhole radius of about a trillionth trillionth of a measured centimeter?”
Robert Sceptico:“You’re right of course. There aren’t
many students of life who can understand the language of the 13-dimensional spacetime continuum. But wouldn’t it be
wonderful, if the various inhabitants and cultural identities on this planet could get to know the common denominator in their
inherited belief systems. The elusive ideal of peace between the tribes and nations and families could be realized if only
their distorted thoughts about religion, their superstitions about gods and devils, of angels and of demons could become scientifically
elucidated and explained.”
Logan Antico:“This is a dangerous
dilemma Robert. Imagine the reactions of the believers in religion, once you have shown them that they and their ancestors
have created every god and every devil ever thought about throughout the history and times of the human existence. The collective
human psyche is saturated with wars, cruelty and violence; the disunity often being brought about by perceived contradictory
interpretations of the ‘holy scriptures’ generic to the various religious sects and denominations.”
Robert Sceptico:“The frustrating experience for informed students of life, like us, is the ignorance of the general
populace in regards to the origins of their ‘sacred scriptures’ and their ‘alchemical scrolls of the mysteries’.
If the followers of the esoteric traditions could only begin to understand the universality of what they term their spirituality
and their supernatural beginnings. If only all the aspiring graduates of life could fathom that the ‘Book of Seven Seals’
is their own book of their own ‘Never ending Story’, their very own ‘My Life’ of having it done ‘My
Way’.
All the pages in the ‘Book of Seven Seals’
are blank, that is the mystery – who then can write upon them to tell their own story to one’s created babies,
the gods and devils, catching their attention?”
5
Logan Antico:“Yes, we might define the origin of that sealed
scroll in the Genesis Boson, the naked singularity and
precursor for five classes of superbranes and the Higgs Boson; others might term it the White Hole Vortex and yet others could
call it the ‘God’ or ‘Allah’ or ‘Brahman’ or primal intelligence of an absolute reality,
which moves across the waters of chaos to divide the light and the darkness or the male and the female or the yang and the
yin in a first level of complexity.”
Robert Sceptico: “Perhaps one could use the information contained in the various scriptures to bridge
the gap between the language of science and the colourful metaphors used in the mythologies. We are both experts in the esoteric
traditions; we understand the multileveled structure of the verses and their numerological and astrological significances
upon whom so much of the wisdom of the mystery schools is based upon. After all, the easiest way to reeducate the students
of life is to use what they already know or what they have heard about, and in that way to shine a new light of omniscience
unto their old perceptions and their culturally inherited ideas.”
Logan Antico:“One could start with a common bond, that what is termed spirituality
across the global spectrum. Perhaps one could keep the term, but render it scientific in renaming it as the scalar component
of Electro- Magnetic Radiation or EMR for the literates in omniscience. Then the beginning students of life would not need
to worry about the superbrane, known as the Magnetic Monopole of selfmodular class IIB and derivative from the Planck Boson
of superbrane class I. Electromagnetic Monopolic Radiation or EMMR could also be known as the ‘emanation of the spirit’
and the modular duality between mass produced EMR and Gravitational Radiation or GR could become universally acknowledged
as the dichotomy between Mind and Body in the form of ‘twinned souls’ of MindBody and BodyMind, so effectively
describing the doubling of oneself in one’s own shadow being, also historically renown as one’s Egyptian ‘Ka’
or German ‘Doppelgänger.”
Robert Sceptico:“Yes Logan, but this results in just another ‘Pandora’s
Box’ being opened, another ‘can of worms’, figuratively speaking. As soon as you discuss the human mind,
people become agitated and defensive. Everyone has rather distinct opinions about their own mindset, its what is known as
the id and the ego, evolutionarily constructed to protect the identities of the perceivers’ self-defined reality. Then
there are the connotations and the innuendos regarding consciousness and selfawareness and the origin of life in general and
the brain-mind intersection in particular.”
Logan Antico:“Then I guess, one just has to attempt to even define consciousness
reductively in scientific terms. But yes, this requires a certain familiarity with the mathematical models, describing the
EMMR, the electromagnetomonopolic radiation in a
natural extension of the Newtonian force laws and the concept of an electricity for the life force circuitry in the
form of differential wave equations. The general ubiquitousness of electricity might be of help here, don’t
you think?”
6
Robert Sceptico:“You might be unto something here! One could describe a simple reduction of a second
order differential equation describing an electric circuit with the elements of resistance, capacitance and inductance into
a first order differential wave equation. Instead of carrying the Coulombic charge
quantum (e) as a certain amount (Q=Ne) of an electric charge (Q), varying in time as the current
(dQ/dt), one sets the twin charge (2e) as a constant coefficient and the variable of change becomes frequency
(f). The time differential of frequency (f) could then be used to scientifically define
the concept of (df/dt) as the ‘Awareness’ of a natural ‘Force of the Mind’, acting
akin to an angular acceleration upon a volume of unit space”
Logan
Antico:“So anyone familiar with electric circuits should
be able to understand the analogy between that kind of ‘normal’ electricity and the ‘natural’ electricity
which resides everywhere in defined spacetime as a monopolic electricity of the vacuum and so as a form of potential monopolic
energy. Instead of throwing a switch to tap the supply from the electricity grid via generators, transformers and the power
stations; one turns on a ‘relay station’ of the mind in a tuning of one’s own life-defining frequencies.
The power of the mind so becomes a function of the quality of one’s ‘pure’ or unimpeded thinking! And the
students of life who are disinterested in the models of electricity can simply term it the energy which renders spacetime what it is and they could even call it the ‘spirit’
which resides everywhere in that defined space and time potentially.”
Robert
Sceptico:“One would still have to illustrate for the interested students though. Would they be able to follow the
mathematical proofs and the logical deductions? It
is my specialty in 12-dimensional CMF-Theory, this modular duality between the EMR and the GR as you know.
Firstly, the unitary symmetry between the Coulombic Electric Constant (k=1/4πεo) and the Gravitational Constant (Go) is used to derive the oscillation of the Planck Boson in terms of its spacial extent
– the Planck-Length (LP).
Secondly
one utilities this intrinsic unification between the Coulombic- and Newtonian force laws to map the 12-dimensional magnetopole-charge (e*) onto the 10-dimensional electropole-charge (e). This is accomplished in the cosmological hologram –
your field of expertise.
Thirdly then, this magnetocharge
(e*) manifests as restmass via the superconductivity in the
vacuum and via the ‘Action-Law’ of action equaling the square of charge.”
Logan Antico: “Yes and the awareness quantum (df/dt)
becomes like an angular acceleration, acting upon a volume of space, defining consciousness in physical terms reductionistically.
The diameter of the electronic spacial extent, known as the classical electronic radius, manifests the energy of the 12D-F-space,
which is magnetopolically equivalent to the electropolic size of an atomic nucleus in 3 dimensions.
And once this
holographic magnification of the Planck- or P-scale is established in the duality of 12D-magnetopoles and 3D-electropoles,
then the restmassinduction of the Higgs Boson and the Higgs (Anti)Neutrino specify the equivalence of energy and restmass
and frequency in the quantum laws of Planck and the geometric relativity laws of Einstein, Minkowski and Witten.”
7
Robert Sceptico:“But hold it Logan, can you hear what we are
saying? How on earth can the
beginning student comprehend what we are discussing? It would be like a nonnative speaker listening to a foreign dialect.
Modular duality, (df/dt), holograms and electropoles – what about the readers
who do not know what those expressions mean?”
Logan Antico:“That might be so Robert; but what are dictionaries for? And we are attempting to answer a profound question here, despite the complacency
of many enquirers who would like to have everything presented and given to them on a plate of easy comfort.
Thinking is hard work; the intellect and one’s mindfulness require daily training and attention.
It has always struck me as very odd; that so many people spend so much time in exercising their bodies.
You see, they quickly become aware, that they are getting sick or are putting on too much weight. So they try to
do something about it - ‘getting fit’ is the catch phrase and a ‘healthy mind in a healthy body’ is
the motto. But the motto is often only half executed; because most people take their minds for granted; they do not believe
or think them to require exercising, just as their bodies do.
So what about the training of one’s thinking processes?
Most people would not even know
how to begin to think about something like that. Sure, some spend lots of money in going to seminars
and in listening to salespeople’s talk of positive affirmations; but to what effect?
Only too often the intellect
is attacked as some sort of egomaniac, who stands in the way of a nirvanistic state of bliss, a heavenly state of mind, requiring
nought but detachment from the material world. What kind of a route of escape is this?
Any logical thinker can counter the argument in stating, that the desire for nirvana is the greatest desire; so how
can then the denial of the thinking process become a way to reach the highest forms of non material transcendence?
If
one aspires to ‘overcome the material world’ so to say, then one has a lot of thinking to do! Channeling one’s desires and passions into constructive
and creative avenues for oneself and one’s environs can produce the calming of emotions, the easing of nervous tensions
and can give great intellectual pleasures in orgasmic harmonies within one’s mind – one might even meet one’s
‘God’.
The so called ‘stilling of one’s mind’ so requires discipline and selfawareness; quality of thoughts
to exercise the puerile mind, which seeks to chatter and to babble on like the immature child it truly is in most of the people,
thinking of themselves as grown-up adults, because of their biological ages.
So can you see it Robert?
The exercising of one’s thinking has largely been forgotten in this age of the ‘quick-fix’ and
the wastefulness of the ‘throw-away’ consumer society. Seniority and experience are judged by biological age,
instead of by the mental maturity of the participants and the openly displayed and so evident wisdom of any prospective candidature.
And
a deep and pertinent question requires, even demands a profound answer.
Where is the God of Science?
That is where shehe and IT is to be found!
Not only is it the naked singularity, it becomes a holographic principle, a highway of ever increasing complexity,
first manifesting as a five folded symmetry in geometric terms, then in a hierarchy of superbranes defined before the beginning
of space and time as a dynamic concept in general relativity.
The 10th dimension uses the 11th as
a mirror to holographically map the 12th; but the beginning of the 10th dimension defines timeinstantenuity,
the birth of the 4D-universe our science measures.”
Robert Sceptico:“Then
timeinstantenuity is the ‘birth of time’ as a quantum of temporal measurement, like a unit of time, which sets
the dynamic evolution of the universe into a classical frame of Einstein’s physics!? But all the time before timeinstantenuity
belongs to the non classical spacetime continuum of the superbranes. And the P-time of superbrane class I, sets the lower
bosonic time limit for the timeinstantenuity as the upper limit in that superbrane epoch; which is often called a time of
‘inflation’ a period in which the universe is thought to have grown in size by a colossal scale factor in the
order of 10,000 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion.
Frequency is the inverse of time, measured in cycles per time unit
How
then are the great cycles of cosmology related to that minimum quantum of time?”
Logan Antico:“One third of a thousandth millionth billionth
trillionth of a measured second is the definition for that time, the birth of the universe and the end of a source bosonic
inflation, the latter also marking four numerical constants for the quantization of spacetime. And since that time, the complexity
is ordering the chaos in cosmic cyclicities.
One great super cycle defines the cosmic ‘recharge-time’ of 7.53
Trillion years; stellar and galactic evolution from ylemic neutron stars to protostars and quasar walls; galaxies, galactic
groups and superclusters, all seeded on White Holes as EMMR-sources and on Black Holes as EMMR-sinks.
Another cycle, the
main frequency for the cosmos is the Hubble-Oscillation, each half cycle lasting 16.9 Billion years for a true age for the universe of 19.11 Billion years
and a nodal Hubble Constant of 58.04 Hubble units in 11 dimensions.
Because light as
the EMR-parameter has begun to double up on itself 2.2 Billion years ago, the spectroscopic measurements of astronomy converge
to a mapped age for the universe in 10D of 14.7 Billion years and a Hubble Constant of 67 Hubble units.”
Robert Sceptico: “Yes this is the amazing nature of this universe,
a protouniverse really. It becomes a multiverse and then an omniverse, yet it remains as an unitary unity. Because the 11th
dimension acts as the universal mirror, the 8th and the 5th and the 2nd dimension form the
fractal surfaces, all enfolded within each other.
So the spacetime of 4D assumes the geometry of a twisted Klein Bottle,
which as a 3D surface envelopes
a 4D volumar of (2π² radius-r³)
units and
as a derivative from the geometrical topology or shape of a 3D-torus or doughnut, projected from
the familiar 2D torus or doughnut as a surface.
There is an asymptotic expansion of the 10D universe, manifesting in 4D
as a hyperbolic and open or diverging geometry of negative curvature.
8
This expansion is imaged in the enclosing membrane of the 11D mirror however,
which is closed, converging in a positive curvature as the hologram of itself in 12 dimensional F-space. And so an overall
flat or Euclidean protoverse with no or zero curvature results in the cancellation of the positive and negative superimposed
geometries for the universe in 10D and in 11D.
The 11D universe has the geometric shape of a prolate ellipsoid (rugby football),
rotating about its major axis with two focus points, defining the specifying elliptical invariance of the 11D universe. And
by the definition of that elliptical geometry, the two foci give the locus of a point moving across the inner surface of the
ellipsoidal envelope as a constant dynamic parameter of displacement.
The dynamics of the 4D spacetime hence become a higher
dimensional mapping from the surface dimensions of the 5D, 8D and 11D. That is the secret of M-Theory, the ‘Magic-Mother’s-Mystery-Membrane-Mirror’
in 11 dimensions. But
rotating the protouniverse about either of the minor axes, forces the focal points to trace out a circle. Geometrically, one
obtains an oblate ellipsoid, like a sphere flattened at the poles, such as the planet Earth. Any minor-axis phase shift of
the protoverse so defines an universe within the omniverse and any two or more universes phase shifted relative to each other
define a multiverse -such is the nature of the universes – worlds within worlds and a nested holographic oneness, enveloping
selfmodular unities, separated in space and in time, yet within the omni space of 12D-F-space.”
Logan
Antico: “Robert, you must have read my notes, you're the expert on the smallest manifestation of the sourcesink
energy, yet you are equally at home in the cosmological considerations at the largest scales.”
Robert Sceptico:“Well it takes two to tango, doesn’t it.
If we travel backwards to the creation of the naked singularity, what do we find? We encounter a scenario out of space and time and just the oneness undifferentiated.
Imagine yourself as sexually unified; not sexless, but male and female principles blended and fused together;
how boring and how lonely would such a state of being be!?
And IT is the HeShe is the SheHe and the GODDOG is the same
as the DOGGOD; the coin has both Head and Tail, but one could think of an awakening where the Head would like to be the Tail
and vice versa.
Now you can see it, don’t you!?
For the head even to see the tail, one has to fixate two mirrors, one in front
of the head or tail and one behind. Then one can view one’s opposite in looking into one of the mirrors to see one’s
imaged reflection in the other mirror.
So by definition of the singularity being singular, just One and not Two; the only
way out to achieve one’s
aim, to have some fun with oneself, is to set up mirrors to look at oneself and imagining of being more than just one, just
oneself, the eternal one with the mirrors of spacetime.”
9
Logan Antico:“I’ve got a proof for what you
just said Robert. It is an esoteric proof however, based on a one-to-one
correspondence between a numerical algorithm and a letter code. Set
1=A, 2=B, C=3 up to Z=26 in the Arabic Alphabet and write the statement:
MIRROR=13+9+18+18+15+18=SPACETIME=19+16+1+3+5+20+9+13+5=SPIRIT=19+16+9+18+9+20
=91.
This should help the scientifically illiterate
or the mystically and esoterically inclined, should it not? Spacetime
is a Mirror and is also the Spirit.
Simply substituting numbers for letters can give
a profound statement, however coincidental and arbitrarily random
it may appear.”
Robert Sceptico: “This is an excellent
omni-scientific discovery and deduction Logan.No need to define space
as a googolplex, a collection of so 100 quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion googols
in the product of 46 and 25 and 36 and 31 and 56 to the 12th power and 61 to the 24th power and 12 to the 42nd power and 24 to the 23rd power; a number
which specifies the 4D-space contained in the 10D asymptotic volume
as space quanta and as a 10D open universe, which converges towards,
but never reaches its 11D boundary.”
Logan Antico: “Yes, and each space
quantum defines a modular duality between a vibrating superstring in 10D and a
winding superstring in 10D. The first has a maximum frequency and
a minimum wavelength relative to its own constructed duality and
the second correlates this in a minimum frequency and a maximum wavelength.
The first defines the microscale of the quantum
relativity in your field of the subatomic realm and the second sets
the macroscale, as in the maximum extent for gravitationally bound galactic superclusters
for example.”
Robert Sceptico: “And we term the first half of the modulation of the heterotic supermembrane
HE(8x8) as ‘Eps’, in a subscript ‘ps’ for the Energy
of the primary-source; matched in the subscript ‘ss’ as an Energy for the other half,
the secondary-sink – together they form the Supermembrane (EpsEss)
in 11D.”
Logan Antico: “So we should have some reason to be confident
in our stated aim to bring omniscience to the people.
To describe the ‘God of Science’ to
the general public should be possible. We must attempt to clothe
our specialist language within the nomenclature and labels of the populace,
taking into account their notions of the transcendent and the invisible.
Just as the main tool of science is mathematics,
often coded in abstractions; so are the ideas of an unmeasurable
spirit moving about and influencing the workings of mankind and of the universe.”
Robert Sceptico: “One might also say,
and to a superstitious student of life in particular; that the religious notion of the
monotheistic deity becomes well justified on quantum relativistic grounds alone. The
Identity of the naked singularity is monadic, just One, without any background or ‘clothing’, and so the Antiidentity cannot exist independently, but as a reflection and as a mirror
image of that oneness or that unity.”
Logan Antico: “And this is like 26=GOD as the Head of the one side of the coin and 26=DOG as the
Tail as the other side. |
