|
Since we seem to have an "educated constituancy" here, what is the thoughts of this group on the most contriversial
of Christianity's tennants? 1) Three Gods but really only one God2) Eating of divine human flesh
from a reserected human (God) sitting in heaven and sending his flesh and blood for non-divine human consumption on earth.3)
Virgin birth of God as the son of God who rose bodily from the dead to sit on the right hand of God to judge the quick and
the dead, etc.I welcome all feedback on how educated folks can deal with these beliefs. In my observations
folks, educated or not often push the "I believe Button" and do not engage their brains regarding anything religion teaches.
What do all of you think? Is religion really the opate of the masses?Paul Swanson Hi
Paul. Here is my take to your questions from the 'gnostic perspective'. 1.
There is no contradiction at all. The threeness of Father-Son-Holy Ghost is simply a generation count of say a paternity:
Grandfather-Father-Son and is also corollary to a maternity: GrandMother-Mother-Daughter (translating as Universe/World/Sun
as GrandMother, the Earth as a Mother and the Daughter as a Holy Spirit) Note,
that the Holy Ghost is male and the Holy Spirit is female here. Also the paternity would by also labeled as GrandFather God,
Father Sky and the Sun as Son and so on by the Egyptians, Greeks and the ancients and the indigenous cultures throughout human
culturual history. The oneness derives from the simple sexchromosomatic
permutations. This is the (a) gnostic meaning of Genesis in the genealogy of Abraham-Isaac-Jacob. Call
Abraham=XY and Sarah=X'X" (Note that one must differentiate between the female X-chromosomes, something now being discovered
in medical science). Then the grandparental offspring will
be the pairings: Son YX' with Daughter XX" and Son YX" with daughter XX'. These are 'baseperfect' sexchromosomatic couplings. Notice,
that the grandparental chromosomes are not reproduced in the second generation. Call
Isaac=YX" and Rebekah=XX' and term a StarSon=YX' and a StarDaughter=XX". Isaac
and Rebekah will have Sons YX and YX' recreating the Abrahamic seed and the StarSon lineage.Isaac
and Rebekah will have Daughters X"X and X"X' recreating the StarDaughter and the Sarah genetics. So
three generations are necessary to recreate the beginning of the 'Abramic StarSeed' anhd to 'close the circle'. As
there are actually 16 elements in this 'Matrix of Israel', one finds genetic mutations like the Babylon-Gene XX, the Sodom-Bilhah-Gene
X"X" and the Gomorrah-Zilpah-Gene X'X'.Of 18 twin-pairings, only the three baseperfect
ones are 'carried' in the biblical genealogies and is found as the major reason as to the 'Jewish purity' definitions (which
do not so much apply to food-and biological cleanliness lawes, but to a gnetic cleanliness as herewith expounded). 2.
Again, the scriptures are correct, if appropriately interpreted. The Catholic eucharist means that one must ABSORB the Christness
in oneself. Saying #106 (Gospel of Thomas, Nag Hammadi 1948):Jesus
said: "Whoever drinks from my mouth will be like me, and I shall be that person, and what is hidden will be revealed
to that one." Compare John.7.37: "If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink". The
religious ritual is simply meant to serve as a REMEMBRANCE (of the last supper etc) to indicate a literal consumption
of the Christbody, which 'is given up for you' etc. to 'cleanse you of your sins' etc. But
simply replace SIN with IGNORANCE and interpret the 'giving up of the human body' as an example for the 'everlasting body
in the father's kingdom' etc. and you might see the gist of the whole story. As
this links closely to 3. I'll continue with that first. Jesus was fathered by Joseph and Mary, but Mary had a secret. She
had a fantasy, when betrothed to Joseph in imagining to be made 'love to' by the 'heavenly father'. She often thought
about what it would be like and masturbated in 'virginlike' devotion to her lover. This
then allowed a number of autosuggestive occurrences within her young body. In a sense, the sexchromosomes of Joseph became
shadowed in her ovaries (this is the story of Gabriel's annunciation).So when the Y-chromosome
of Jesus, the Man pierced Mary's ovum, the X-chromosome of Joseph's sperm, normally absorbed by the placenta, also manifested
in say a shadow-or twin existence. This means that the female
Jesus became hypergenetically expressed, just as is the case in transgender and related sexual characteristics throughout
human history. Jesus so was able to express a basic human
bisexuality in a unified mental manner. The deeper gnostic significance is, that he so was a heshe, and able to represent
the 'Wife of God' on earth. This 'wife of the father' is
Barbelo as the Afterthought, the Forethought being the father or the 'shining and glorious one' (or whatever read gnostic
literature for details). Barbelo is also the world or the
universe as the physical Body of God, the spiritual Body being the 'Life thereof'. But
Barbelo became physical through the manifestation of a duality and the shadow-imaging of the 'Lovechild' between father and
mother, called the 'christchild'. This physicality became
a creation of the universe without the father's input (according to gnostic lore) and became Jehovah as the OldTestament
God - a demiurge, called Yaldebaoth....., who created a mirror-world of the 'christ-world' etc. etc. Ergo,
the physical Jesus could become the agent for Barbelo to 'redeem her IGNORANCE' (albeit foreknown by the father and deemed
necessary for evolutionary purposes ---aka aka Adam and Eve fable, where the serpent is the disguised Christ to induce the
loss of innocence etc. etc.). So Jesus physical body was
not only a kind of genetic mutation because of the shadow-femininity; it also became the literal physical Barbelo in the form
of his mother Mary (this is the gist of the Revelation.12, where Jesus is REBORN in heaven as after returned PHYSICALLY to
heaven and the right side of the father -the left side being sinister=evil etc as the duality in the yin-yang etc.). Some
religious adherents knew part or all of this; some Benedictine monks implore 'Our Holy Mother Jesus' in their prayers to this
day in their rituals. So the physical resurrection fits into
the saga as the 'giving up, or sacrificing' of a special body (not special in terms of human biochemistry, but special in
realised potential of self-realisation or such).Jesus knew or intuited the cosmogenesis, as
it had occurred and in the language and symbols of hisher day fulfilled hisher mission. Jesus'
body was 'sacrificed' for the 'remission of ignorance' to show what 'might' be possible. To
'live and come again'; Jesus MUST be REBORN in the bodies and minds of the starseed of Abraham and Sarah. As
every Grandpa is (or can pretend to be) Abram=? renaming himself as Opa Abraham? and likewise and Grandma is Sarai=? becoming
Sarah?; the trinity of GrandFather Forethought with GrandMother Afterthought giving birth to Father Sky and Mother Earth and
Children Yang and Yin in multitudes; the idea of a meaningless biochemical and random human existence is gnostically refuted. Tony
B.
Bud Dickerson wrote in theoretical physics wrt Paul Swanson:
As to religion, unlike science nothing
must be proved.Things accepted but not proved are fine with me as it relates to the person who does the accepting, but not
fine with me when I am bullied to believe the same conclusion. I believe the Big Bang occured and may have occured many
times. I cannot definitively prove it, but the evidence and body of work is good enough form me to beieve it happened.
I also have a problem with dark matter and currently working my way through it. It seems to me people shoul be continuously
doing the same concerning religion. As you age and mature in thought you should contiually re-examine those things you
held to be true when you were more nieve. As for God existing as three persons and they be of a paticular sex, all that
confuses me. It seems the idea makes Jesus possible as a devine person in a mortal body. However a spirit
that has no need to reproduce and therefore no body to do so, most likely, if it exists, has no sex. Speaking of this
being in absolutes creates its own problems. How can a single being be all meciful and all just at the same time.
A merciful would require all sins be forgiven, thus rendering judgement unnecessay. It seems to be true that Matriarchal
societies have female Dieties, while Patriachal societies tend toward male Dieties. I am particularly amused by the
wrath with which the Big Bang is received by a conservative Evangelical person. The evangelical believes God made the
universe from nothing from within himself. The first big bang may have occured when the universe was without mass and
contained only energy. The matter we see to day can be considered the storge form of energy. Big Bang defines
the beginning as energy obeying the laws of physics while the evangelical person believes the creation event (beginning of
matter) was a devine decision. One God, three persons aides in the conversion of none believers practicing a belief
containing multiple Gods, such as the Romans, Greeks, American Indian, etc. I think I have made the point. I would
like to prove the existence of God before my own death. It seems the only way to communicate results successfully to
others. Bud Hi Bud! Here are my comments: 1. There was just the one (thermodynamic-entropic)
Big Bang, which as you also 'believe' was massless at first but via the equivalence principle became inertial in certain transformation
of energy concepts (and manifesting the metrics of the relativistic cosmologies in the process). 2. The sexual
duality stems from the 'femaleness' of all material parameters. So the entire physical universe as the 'body of God' can be
considered female. This is like the architect designing a plan for a house. Before the 'house of brick and mortar' is build,
an 'abstract aka mathematical' template is created, thought of, invented, imagined or what have you. The duality
then is like the wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics. The wave is unified from top-down and the particle
is unified from bottom-up as the constituents of that selfsame wave in spacetimes defined in the physical parameters (metrics). So
the universe can only be understood as a wave aka holistically from the point of view of an 'outside observer'. Because
the 'outside observer' or 'God separate from its creation' is logically inconsistent, a duality of the outside observer with
the inside observer must come into being from first principles. So 'God' (say defined as a male principle of
creator chicken/sperm/DNA or Y-chromosome or Yang or odd number etc...) BIFURCATES ITSELF LOGICALLY (as the Logos
aka The Word) into its Mirror-Image say semirotically as GOD-DOG. The 'anti-male' principle aka the female principle
so becomes ILLUSIONARY relative to the former and a 'Shadow God' is created as the 'Creation female principle of the Egg/ovum/RNA'. But
this then allows 'Birth-Death-Rebirth' cyclicities to manifest, say in the 'birth of gravity' (as the Grave) to couple
the dualities. So then 'God' as separate, becomes imaginary and the premise of the atheist and the materialist.
God as real 'spiritual identity' conversely becomes the 'belief' of the theist and the like. But the original
'GoddoG' is undifferentiated, aka bisexual in the unbifurcated nature of say Leibnitz' monad or Spinoza's 'universal essence'. Encompassingly,
BECAUSE a physical universe exists, BOTH as REAL relative to one observer and ILLUSIONARILY (Maya of the Buddhist say) to
an 'anti-observer'; there should also be a substructure of the 'GoddoG' bifurcation aka the chicken-egg conundrum in
a biological and chemical and physical polarity splitting into opposite couplings. Gnostically speaking then,
this bifurcation can (but is not required to be) be expressed in a doubled trinity of generations. 3. The proof
for the existence of 'God' is not necessary. Drawing the necessary conclusions in selfconsistent logic demands the following. a)
space and time (and mass etc.) are physical constructs, which allow the duality to manifest and evolve. b) subsequently,
the events of birth and death are simple markers within a spacetimeless continuum, one particular traversion of a circle signifying
a conception-death cyclicity. c) The Big Bang was a boundary condition or initial birth, which BEGAN the manifesto of the
aforedescribed duality on the grandest scale. d) subsequently, every birth of something embodying this duality, say a baby,
MUST REBANG the entire universe of holographic unison. e) As YOU know, that once you were a baby born, YOU were present
(but cant remember) when the Big bang occurred. f) subsequently YOU are the 'GoddoG' manifesting itself in your conception-birth-death
from the duality described from within and without the spacetimelessnersss before the Big Bang. g) As YOU exist -
God must exist as YOUR maleness and doG must exist as your femaleness. h) YOUR maleness will be a quadrupolar collective
coupled to your femaleness. i) A biological male, defined in the presence of a Y-chromosome has MindBody(-+) and BodyMind(-+)
as the aforsaid waveparticle duality. j) A biological female, defined in the absence of the Y-chromosome has MindBody(+-)
and BodyMind(+-) in corollary. k) Every Male so defined (there can exist genetic mutations physically manifesting
shemales or hefemales of course) actually EXISTS in two places at once. l) The physical Male in embodiment finds himherself
in a spacetime continuum, called a time and place in history say. The shadow-spiritual Male in disembodiment resides in the
'Mirror' of the physical universe, namely a COLOCAL Shadow-Universe AS God. m) The corollary of course applies for the
female polarity as Dog -Every Man's 'Best Friend'. Tony B.
The Rising of the Sun, The Running of the Deer
The holly and the ivy, When they are both full grown, Of all trees that are in the wood, The holly bears
the crown
Yuletide Carol from Druidic Origins
Blessings and Joy on the Return of the Light
(posted by Jordan Stratford+, 21.12.2004)
To: Panentheism@yahoogroups.com From: prs7795@aol.com Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:30:29 -0500 Subject:
Re: [Panentheism] Educated beliefs or I believe button
Tony B,
Thanks for your very detailed reply.
I confess I have several books on various Gnostic groups and I never saw anything like your explanation. I will
have to chew on what you wrote tomorrow and see what is what.
Thanks again for taking the time to clear up this view point.
Paul Swanson
|