|
I shall address the 'universal evil' issue later, but would like to share here a topical correspondence
from August 23rd, 2005. This is a correspondence between Robert Kernodle and Tony B. with input from April (on this forum).
Thanks, Tony.
I figured that you would take such an approach, which brings us back
to the "chicken/egg"
paradox.
Respectfully (and always with admiration for your ideas), I differ
from you in that I think that something
overshadows BOTH chicken and
egg. >>You
are asolutely correct here Robert and I could not agree more with you.But
can you see that this 'overshadow' is the chicken before it was formed and the egg before it was even thought off?Your bible says so in genesis 2.4-5: "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth
when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew:for
the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground." Pure gnosis and encoded omniscience Robert. 'Take it away from the religious literalists AND take it away
from the antireligious literalists AND give it to the gnostic religion and the gnostic science for interpretation. Do NOT go to the non-gnostic priest or the non-gnostic scientist for advice; go to the gnostic advicer,
because you shall be greatly confused in mind if you attempt to read this either emotionally-religiously or intellectually/academically-scientifically. Gnostic advisor would say (dialogue with a scientist
and a believer say): ""Easy my friend; the heavens and the earth are allegory (thank you April) for the physics and the metaphysics as generally
used in your vocabulary.So when it says before the earth, it means before
the physical whatever.Now compare it to say an apple-tree or a rooster. Gnostic: Where did the finished 'product'
of the apple-tree come from? Scientist: From its seed. Believer: The bible says from God, he created the apple tree. Gnostic: Both Correct, and where did the seed come from? Scientist: From the programmed DNA/RNA. Believer: Ah this provbes science wrong, because
the scriptures say,that the apple-tree was created before its seed in the ground by Gen.2.5. God did it. Gnostic: Both correct, and where did the DNA/RNA
and God come from? Scientist: This is the chicken-egg dichotomy. We are gathering more and more evidence, that the RNA is precursive to
the DNA from the beginnings of cellular and bacterial lifeforms. Because the chicken is basically protein/amino acids and
the egg can be linked to viral absorption by bacteria without DNA becoming its DNA, say in bacteriophages; the DNA is
basically a viral mutation of primordial genes in endosymbiosis with primordialRNA as collection of nucleotidal petides.Then those organic molecules occur in bifurcated enantiomated formations of chirality/crystalline
forms of isomerism. In living things the DNA/RNA's sugar-phosphate bases
are predominatly righthanded with lefthanded amino acids. But in nonorganic molecular arrangements of thje amino acids and
constituients show equalprobabilities to exist in a natural way.Subsequently
science now suspects that the basic lefthandedness of radioactivity responsible for nucleosynthesis and the creation of the
atomic elements has become transformed from the subatomic scale onto the scales of biological evolution. Then the origins of the neutron and the fundamental
forces of physics must be the cause for the observance of allphenomena including the biological ones.So in terms of science, we would say that the chicken as the DNA engaged in a synthesis with the egg as
the RNA, the RNA being more a manifestor of incumbent DNA than the other way around however. The DNA then becomes rthe agency
for the incumbency tomanifest itself in the advancement of the evolutionary process. Believer: God made the DNA/RNA and God is eternal. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the subatomic
neutron and eternity? Scientist: The neutron is a vibrating superstring, a specialmanifestation of the Planck-Scale, which defines the
limits for all physicalmeasurement because of its interdimensional selfconsistency allowing all of physics to transmutate
into pure mathematics, that is metaphysics.We call this the Big Bang,when
both time and space were created from a spacetimeless realm, where such definitions cease to have any physical meaning
whatsoever. The neutron became a consequence of conservation laws in energy and momentum in many associations to manifest
a bifurcation ofpolarities, say gravity of contraction and radiation of expansion. Believer: God made eternity, because he is eternity through
his word, this is clearly defined in John.1.1. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the Big Bang and who made the Word, because John.1.1 clearly says
that the Word preceded God? Scientist: Well, we have discovered a multiverse or megaverse scenario where there could exist epochs of 'banging' say
in the collission of braned universes as initiatingh certain great cosmic cyclicities of banging and antibangings/crunches.We also have discoverd a Planck-Length-Bouncing, which allows the transmutation of the Big Bang physical
parameters such as length and time to be redefined in a preBig Bang scenario of unified charge settings.Those settings broke symnmetry and manifested in the Big bang as 4 fundamentalforces, modified in a fifth.So now we scientist have found synthesis with the old choices of our models allowing a harmony between
them. Instead of an expanding universe or a static universe in competition, we can superpose and have them both in one.We can now confidently say, that the Big bang made itself, there is no preCreator necessary to bring the
universe as we know it into existence. Believer: Good question, but scripture answers this in John.1.1:"In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God."So the Word and God are the same thing and made each other. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the process of this oscillating universe and the equality between God
and the Word? Scientist:
The Laws of Nature. Believer: The Law of God. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the Laws of Nature and the Laws of God? Scientist: Nature of course. Believer: God of course. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made Nature and
who made God? Scientist:
Nature just exists and God is a human invention. Believer: God just exists and made everything. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made existence to exist? Scientist: Existence is the antitheme to Nonexistence, because
I exist I exist. One of us has encapsulated this in: "Cogito ergo sum!" I think, therefore I am! (Descartes). Believer: Exodus.3.14: "I am That I am!" is
the name of God given to Moses in the burning bush of the holy ground on Mount Horeb. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the "Cogito ergo sum!"
and the "I am That I am"? Scientist: Those are just words of philosophy, created by the thinkers. Believer: Moses must have heared God's voice in his language
to have been able to pass this holy name on, but God's voice on Mount Horeb made or uttered his own name. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made philosophical
thought and God's voice? Scientist: The experience and history of the human race in toto and huam ingenuity and inventiveness.Believer: God simply has a voice in some manner to pass on his Word, say through the prophets, like Moses. Gnostic: Both right, and who made thought and
the prophets? Scientist:
Thought is related to consciousness and connectivity of neural network in the human CPU known as the brain and prophets are
just humans, often selfdeluded in hearing imaginary voices from the supernatural. Believer: God calls and inspires the prophets, if they
are of pure heart and if they have overcome their inborn sinful nature. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the thought and the consciousness and the neural network interrelated
and the pure heart and the sinful nature? Scientist: Nature. Believer: The pure heart is with God and the sinful nature is with the Devil. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made nature and
God and the Devil? Scientist: We have been there before, this is a circular argument. Nature just exists, it just is and God and Devil are
mystical human inventions of superstitious supernaturalism. Believer: The bible says that God and Devil are the same and not the same, because in Job there is Satan
as a challenger to God about Job not being temptable to curse God for his misfortunes and then there is the temptation in
the wildernness in regards to Jesus and some of our expert theologians also know that a scriptural distinction
between Lucifer, Devil and Satan is necessary, that these are three different beings in some sense.Yet Isaiah clearly states that the Lord created both good and evil and that he is the author of everything
and responsible for everything good and bad under the sun and moon and heavens. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the circular
argument, the tautology and the Lord of both 'Good and Evil' and the three characterisations of Lucifer, Devil and Satan? Scientist: The tautology is simply a question
of logic and of mathematics and of definition. Believer: God made, invented and is everything.Gnostic:
Both correct, and who made mathematics, logic and God? Scientist: Mathematics is a human cultural invention in one school of thought and is a description of idealised
form, say Platonic in another. Believer: God made himself by his Word. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made the distinction between the Platonic and NonPlatonic realm or mode
of thinking and who made the God his own Word? Scientist: Mankind. Believer: God. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made Mankind and who made God? Scientist: Mankind evolved from Homo sapiens forms like homo
habilis, homo erectus, the australopithecines and the ape-sapiens divergence from the Darwinian tree of life continually
miodified and added to in data base as new discoveries are made. God is a metaphysical human invention. Believer: God created Mankind in the Garden
of Eden and himself by his Word. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made evolution, the tree of life and the Garden of Eden? Scientist: Nature, Darwinian classification
schemes and the Garden of Eden is metaphysical supernaturalism. Believer: There is a Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden which was made by God, who made everything. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made Nature and
God and the Tree of Life in two places at once, in the classification schemes of Darwin's science and in the Garden of Eden,
metaphysical to the scientist and physical to the Believer? Scientist: Nature just exists and the rest is just word play between different ways of classifying
and perceiving philosophical things within a shared physical reality and a mental reality which is often unreal relative
to physical science and is not shared by all in common perception. Believer: God allows the good and the evil to coexist until judgement day, but God made everything.Gnostic: Both correct, and who
made the distinction between the real and the unreal relative to the perceiver and who allows the distinction between
the good and the evil to be made? Scientist: Mankind and it's philosophies. Believer: The Devil tries to lead mankind onto the path of evil and mankind must repent to find God
again. This would be impossible for mankind, were it not for our saviour Jesus Christ, who died for us, so that we should
live.So because of Jesus, we can return to God if we repent from
our sins and if and only if we choose to follow our saviour and call upon his name. Gnostic: Both correct, and who made mankind, it's philosophies
and Jesus as mankind's redeemer? Scientist: Mankind evolved and if the mythological Jesus ever existed as a real person, then he had a father
and a mother and was descended from the apes and the tree of life like everyone else. Believer: God is Jesus' father and God made mankind and allows
it it's philosophies to choose the Ways of God over the Ways of the Devil? Gnostic: Both right, and who made Evolution of Mankind and
the Choosing of the two ways of Good and Evil possible? Scientist: This is a circular argument, Evolution is Existence, which is a blending of Philosophy with
the analysis of an ever growing data base, subject to investigation as to the Nature of Nature, which just exists. Believer: It was because of the Fall and the
Original Sin, that the Choosing between the two ways is made possible. Either one chooses God with Jesus or the Devil and
the World. Gnostic:
Both right, and who made the philosophies and the data base and the Original Sin, as the agency to effect the ability to choose? Scientist: Mankind made everything philosophical
in correspondence with the data supplied by Nature. Science studies Nature's evidence about herself.Believer: God made everything and it was the choosing of Eve to eat from the apple tree, that the foriginal
sin of the disobedience eventuated. Gnostic: Both right, and who made Nature to be called a She in Science? Scientist: Ah, that is a remnant of the history
and development of science. It'sa sort of ancient heirloom, like calling astronomical objects and discovery after mythological
characters like Andromeda and Venus and Mercury.Nature is personified
in such a wayas a leftover from the birth of the sciences from alchemy becoming chemistry and astrology transmutating into
astronomy.It would be a way to relate Nature as She to He, which is the
God of Superstition. One must accept, that the birth of science and the scientific method in the renaissance and thereabouts
in the West, had a forerunner all founded on established religion and dogmatic metaphor and associations. Believer: Eve is called the Mother of all Living
and Adam did name her so in Gen.3.20: "And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living." Gnostic: Both right, and now you have converged
in the circular argument and solved the great secret of gnosis."" Because Eve is the Nature of Science as the prime and original cause of Existence and as SHE is the Mother
of all living and as accepted by the Believer, one can easily deduce that Adam is the Man and Son of God, which does the NAMING
as the WORD of all things.So every name calling scientist is the Word
and also the Son of God who is the encoding of the redeemer, say Jesus in the footsteps of Adam.And every Believer calling upon the name of Jesus is also the Word and so becomes equal to the scientist
in the two ways of perception.In betwen you have the Name calling artists
and inventors who simply take a bit of both in the same final outcome, being Adam=Son of God.Because the distinctions are made by the philosophies of mankind, which were caused by the Original Sin/Ignorance
of not being able to choose, and the CHOICE was made by Science's NATURE as the Believer's EVE; the eating of the forbidden
fruit in the Garden of Eden caused the Believer in EVE (namely Adam) to suddenly make a distinction between 'Good and
Evil' so barring him from accessing the Tree of Life and Knowledge, namely the Darwinian Tree of Life of Science.Because NATURE just exists without prior cause EVE exists without prior cause, relative to the scientist,
leading to the circular argument as exemplified in this discourse. The Believer, through applied gnosis of the WORD, then REDEEMS the scientist because heshe knows (through
scripture) where Eve came from.
As Eve is the CREATION in toto, the Believer can proclaim in all confidence:The CREATION was made by her CREATOR, which is Adam from God. The Scientist translates this by hisher own agenda as NATURE
MADE HERSELF or the UNIVERSE CAME INTO BEING JUST BY ITSELF.The Beliver's
circular argument always returns to God by his Word as the prime cause, and the Scientist REDEEMS the Believer in
confidently proclaiming: There is no CREATOR, the CREATION created HERSELF by the NATURAL LAWS. And then the gnosis CAN illuminate the Believer as to what the WORD of God must BE; nothing BUT THE
LAWS OF NATURE, because of the convergence of the two ways, which could be chosen in their extremes 100% Scientist or 100%
Believer.Then the LAWS OF NATURE CAN become GNOSTIC - that is APPLIED
in the two hitherto incompatible ways.All gnostic scripture are the Word
of God and ALLOW the Laws of Nature to become discovered, rediscovered, reinterpreted, illuminated, extended etc.etc.in anyones
gnostic insight.Only the GNOSIS of understanding BOTH, the allegories
and scriptural stories, mythologies and pathos AND the basic methods and ways of science through the histories of both, Science
and Religion, can synthesise the two options or choices harmoniously.And
it all started with the 'seed of an apple', the apple in the eye of HE and SHE as the creators of it all as THEIR own individual
STORY of selfredemption, just in thinking Separation in Unity and not Unity in Separation.To be separated from the One you Love is the most Painful experience of humanity.Now ponder this. To be separated a certain distance or time, and awaiting the other's return is Separation
in Unity, because the Love and Longing Passion and expectation is all there - there is a FINITE spacetime between the Lovers.But what if that spacetime is INFINITE in a Unity of yourself as Being yourself AND ALONE, your
LOVER being eternally far away.How the Love is shattered and the Longing
Passion and the Expectations.That is why the Infinite Universe of localised
Unity is the BURDEN of the present world.The localised unity are the
power groups and elites, the 'royal blood' and concentration of influence etc. etc.That is the dilemma for the group-mind right now and here.The Unity
in Separation is empowered and the UNIFICATION OF MONEY, I give you a gnostic hint of what the DEVIL, ruining the entire physical
and emotional and mental world really is.DEVIL=4+5+22+9+12=52=6+9+14+1+14+3+5=FINANCE.There you have it from the GWMD-APDN of the 24th.Now
you can superpose your conspiracy theories (most of which are partially very true despite the agenda of widespread seeding
of misinformation from many many quarters), your economic models and your alternative sciences upon this 'master-seed' of
deception and corruption.I choose very rarely to give messages like this,
but this one had to be given.The encoding mystery is minimal. See
Robert Kernodle, our agreement on the evolution/creation stupidity triggered something in me to compose this.
I had no prior intent to write this, and you have,
through your gnostic insights, allowed my sources to give this information to the world.
This message so is,one might say,
sponsored by Robert K.
Thank you Robert.
In appreciation Tony B.
|
Satan as the Opponent and Lucifer as the Light Bearer
Tony,
and anyone else who could bear some light to the subject?
I'm wondering if we could talk about Lucifer, as a being
of love and
the caretaker of humanity?
And Satan, which in Hebrew means 'opponent' and how he is lovingly
teaching
us to be brighter lights and more tuned into God?
And how some occult circles actually see Enki as the Devil? I have
some
musings on my own about this subject matter, and my research for my
novel is bringing me into some very interesting
finds. But I would love
to receive pearls of wisdom from others before I could find the
inspiration to string my pearls
together and present them to all.
Can we sit and talk about Sympathy for the Devil? For, really, that is
what
Love is all about, yes, no?
Tell me all your thoughts on Divinity?
Hi Cheryl!
The sympathy for the Devil is not the same as the sympathy for Satan (the adversary in JOB) and
is not the same as the sympathy for Lucifer (the Lightbringer, the Morning- and the Evening Star aka Venus).
The
DEVIL does not exist; Satan exists as the image of God and Lucifer exists in many ways and forms, not least as that of
'the Evil in every Man'.
Gnostically, Lucifer is the SERPENT in the garden of Eden as a PRESENT to
allow the HeShe AdamEve (or Adam Kadmon in Kabbalah) to lose its sexual nonidentity.
Gnostically, the Serpent
is the Christ as the 'redeemer of Adam, split from Eve'.
The brief gnosis is this. We move in thought to a time
before creation and before Adam and Eve etc.
Think of the primal thought (call this God) of pondering
itself. This is like a reflection in the mirror. Now God sees himherself, ergo sexually nonexistent. The first thought so
requires differentiation.
{This by the way can be rigorously derived in say a binary algorithm, defining a twofolded eigenstate,
say 0s and 1s}.
But allegorically, God ponders himself and so 'sees' himself in a mirror reflection (say).
This
'himself' is Satan. God becomes 'unhappy'. The first thought did not create a desired opposite in herself; but simply duplicated
the old self as image.
So the 'masterplan' of God becomes to TRANSFORM the 'himself' of Satan into a 'herself'.
THEREFORE,
the universe became thought of and then created (using laws of nature, defined in the binary algorithms, say).
You
can do this yourself. Looking into a mirror, who is real you or the image?
But doing this in spacetime, will
result in physics, objects and images and so on.
Doing it without space and time creates the universe, both physically
and in thought.
Anyway, this is the reason, why the universe physical is considered female by all cultures. We
talk of 'Mother Nature/Earth' and 'Father Sky/Mind' etc.
After a physical universe exists with the creation of
space and time and so on; the 'looking into the mirror' of God becomes twosided and the inherent bisexuality of creation can
become implemented, say in the male and female sexchromosomes.
In a sense the physical 'she-universe' is 'impregnated'
by the mental 'he-universe' and the thing is holographic with the 'little he-she-universes' replaying the cosmic scenario
on a smaller scale.
A Adam so becomes the true image of God from the mental-physical side and a Eve becomes the
true image of God from the physical-mental side.
This is the symmetry and the symbolic meaning of Eve coming out from Adam
(as his rib in say a recursive chromosome coupling XX:->XY+XX, the rib being the digit differentiating X from Y from the
reconstituted XX).
So God as MIND becomes physical as Adam with Satan as the image-mind relegated as a secondary,
albeit real partner of God.
The true purpose is however to transmutate Satan into Satana or corollarily
Lucifer into Lucifera as the MIND GODDESS to be harboured in the physical universe.
So the loneliness of Adam
in Genesis IS the loneliness of God without the Goddess.
Adam is the ambassador for God as ANY MAN and Eve is
the ambassadora for the Goddess (in becoming) as ANY WOMAN.
The story of this is Genesis and related scripture
and mythologies.
Satan is the IMAGINARY BROTHER OF GOD and his UNREAL IMAGE relative to him; but real relative
to an inhabitant in the mirror of course.
Satana is the GODDESS, which God imagines to be his mirror image. Satana
is the 'LOST MIND' of the entire universe 'waiting deliverence' (Hebrews and Paul's letters in the NT etc).
Satana
IS the physical universe destined to 'blend' with the mental universe in a twofold manner.
Now the male mentalitity
is complete and evolving as the Male GodMindUniverse.
Now the female body-universe is complete and evolving as the Female
GoddessBodyUniverse.
Now (in linear time), the male bodyuniverse is trapped in the mortality of maleness
within the mortality of the femaleness.
Now the female mind-universe is similarly trapped in the immortality of the female-mindedness
within its male encompassment.
It is all symmetry, one within the other. The male bodyuniverse requires redemption
by and through the female bodyuniverse and vice versa, the female mind requires deliverence through its male counterpart.
But
this scenario depicts the individualised story for the cosmic agenda.
Literally, God has no bodyform until MAN
'discovers' finds, evolves or whatever HIS demortalisation in a 'different body' (lightbody, spiritbody, hybrid between mass
and light or whatever - this is what is prophesiesed and promised in scripture etc).
Once MAN finds his bodyuniverse;
WOMAN will find her minduniverse or vice versa. One cannot do without the other.
So SATAN is real in a
relative sense, even as yin-yang as the 'battle of the sexes'.
Ergo the peripheral reason for the 'sin of homosexuality'
is not male-male or female-female sexual activity; BUT the mental abberration of not allowing the other.
God's
unreal image is the abberration as his 'bastard' image of the Dog of Satan.
This is why DOGGOD=GODDOG symbolically and
pertinently describes the encompassing cosmogony in a nutshell.
SATANA so IS SATAN, but AFTER A SEXCHANGE.
Whenever
this happens, will be the fulfilment of all the prophecies regarding a new creation, old and new.
The DEVIL=LIVED
is UNREAL and depicts the existence of God's unreal image as real in his own doomain of the spacetimelessness.
This
is why the DEVIL as the Red Dragon can be 'thrown out from heaven' (God's Mind say) in Revelation 12.
It
is the 'Devil which deceived all of then, which dwell on the earth', which is forever 'banned' into the 'lake of fire and
brimstone' and not Satan (bound for 1000 years, which is 1 day, the 'day of the Lord' in 2Peter.3.8).
The DEVIL
IS the FAKEIMAGE OF GOD, his unreal reflection in some imaginary mirror NOT in space and time.
The 'Lake of Fire
and Brimstone' is the relationship between 'redeemed' Man and Woman, aka Adam and Eve selfrealised and knowing in full remembrance
who they are.
So the sexual unity between them as AdamEve=FireBrimstone and EveAdam=BrimstoneFire constitures
the 'Lake of eternal damnation' for the lies of the fake image of the 'refusal of Satan' to just BE Satana and of the opposite
sex to God (after the primal thought, splitting into yin and yang).
That Jesus, gnostically identifies with
the LUCIFER is proven in the scriptures themselves:
Rev.:2.28(KJV): Jesus says: "And I will give him
the morning star."
Rev.22.16(KJV): Jesus says: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things
in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
Being the root and
offspring, makes Christ both father and son and also the mother, because AdamEve is the first true physical image of God in
an imaginary physical universe (yet to be created).
So the story of the Serpent being Christ is rendered as true
unmistakenly in the gnostic thought.
The Serpent is the agent to awaken both yang and yin to their great task
to redeem God the Father from his loneliness in providing a Mother Goddess (called Barbelo and afterthought) in playing'
a cosmic game called Life and Love and Lust and what have you.
Tony B.
Rev.:2.28(KJV): Jesus says: "And I will give him the morning star."
Sorry, Tony, to snip the rest. I understood
it.
There is really but One Man and One Woman, and even that is a Duality that once surpassed is an
Illusion. The Universe is Whole and Hermaphroditic. It is Consciousness
that fractures it into Opposites.
>>Absolutely.
This is beautifully expressed and comprehended by you. 100% gnostic insight.
One can only wish that perhaps
a few others could perceive the significance of your simple sentences above.
But
the above quote is what I was getting after.
Could you elaborate and refresh my memory on how this is Lucifer and
Venus? Could this refer to the Goat of Mendes concept? And I see the
Goat of Mendes by Levi to be a borrow from the
Khem of Mendes, which
was a goat worshipping tribe that practiced Tantra.
But it's this quote that I'm most interested
in. Please, go on with
this? Thank you.
C
>>The Goat of Mendes is of course Baphomet as
the the androgenous nature of the Divine, divine here blending the dichotomy of 'good and evil' or 'man and woman' or 'God
and the Devil'. I have posted a lengthy treatise on this before under the 'male union of Yaldabaoth and the female Baphomet'
{go to my site and the inventory there for a better copying description}.
Luciferic
mythology stems from the bible of course (and its sources) and describes the arch-cherubim as Lucifer, which attempted to
usurp "God as the highest'.
The story is in Ezekiel and in Isaiah, say compare
Eze.28.14-18 and Isa.14.12-14.
The endoteric meaning is that Lucifer here splits
into a dichotomy. The 'good' archangel Michael and the 'evil' archangel Lucifer. So a 'dark' Lucifer splits from a 'bright'
Lucifer.
A imo 'more meaningful' dichotomy becomes a male Michael and a female
Michaela/Lucifera in the footsteps of the genesis of the prephysical universe as thoughtform (John would like this). Ezekiel
28 describes this allegorically.
LUCIFER=LightBringer=Venus=Aphrodite=Goddess
of Love so resurrects the 'fallen Lucifer' in the bisexuality of Jesus as embodiment of the Mother as Beloved of the Father
aka God's 'missing wife'.
This then leads into the esoteric meanings of Christianity,
the Eucharist, the 'sacrificing bodies' and so forth.
In your quote above,
Jesus says to GIVE the 'morning star', the Lucifera to anyone 'overcoming' the delusions of the appearances and so on.
In
the other quote (of my original post), Jesus claims TO BE the morning star, which he is giving away.
This
is so profound, it has escaped the attention of theologians, skeptics, historians and anyone else I have ever come across.
Properly
understood, it would reinvigorate all of Christianity overnight, as it would show what the rituals embody as say 'gnostic
truth'.
Jesus gives up his body for the simple reason to BECOME the NEW IMAGE
for God's Mirror. He 'overcomes the world', in displacing the selfimage of 'the Father' with his image AS THE MOTHER
of ALL.
Jesus resurrects as the 'right side of God', which is the one side of the mirror, the other side
being 'left' aka 'sinister' aka 'evil'.
But if Jesus is right, God is left or vice versa. It doesn't matter.
So
Jesus CAN GIVE his LUCIFER to anyone asking for it - AS HIS MALENESS, which he does not desire as the MOTHER.
Beautifully
encoded in revelation, the new Woman GIVES BIRTH to a new Jesus in heaven, but must then flee into the wilderness, where she
is 'nourished by the earth' from the persecution by the Red Dragon.
So who
is the messiah thus born?
ANYMAN on earth, who has been given the Luciferness
of Jesus.
But this is not enough. For now the Mother, say the resurrected Jesus
as Satana and the new MENTAL IMAGE (Nothing of this is physical btw; but a new archetypical creation) has a characteristic
which is part of two worlds.
This is embodied in the Scroll of Thoth aka Hermes
Trismegistos in the As Above, So Below scroll found in the pyramids. It is also known as the Sapphire tablet of Moses. I have
published it in 3 languages on many forums many times (Latin, German and English).
So
the key becomes the necessity of a female 'messiah' in embodiment on earth, which somehow must follow the footsteps of Jesus.
I often have labeled her Jesusina or Anubia.
It is of course ANYWOMAN potentially, only requiring a selfchoosing.
Once
a female embodiment has overcome mortality, the same way Jesus did (subject to belief of some sort, if not scientific feasibility
in modilitis [such as QR attempts btw]); the HARMONY in HEAVEN between left and right aka good and evil aka body
and wave aka male God and female Universe aka yin and yang (in no particular order) would be established and the physical
would be FORCED to follow in the above-below axiom.
Summararily then, the harmony
between male-female partnerships is of the utmost importance in a necessary unification or better reunification of the sexes.
As all males and females are by nature bisexual, but commonly express one or the other; a 'worldly harmony' between some Adam
and some Eve would effectively quadruple individuality in a heshe-shehe partnership, aka a 'lake of fire and brimstone' aka
the 'eternal damnation of the fake images of the 'devil(s)''.
The obsession
of humanity with all things sexual so derives from the enormous conflict on a cosmic scale, which is necessary to solve its
own (heavenly, read out of space and time) dilemma of transforming an old creation of dichotomy into a new creation of
quadropolar dragonomies (my labellings).
The socalled 'second coming' so should
be a bifurcation in the human genus; instigated by couplings in a 'orgiastic' or Dinosyian manner of selfsexually unified
'humans' enabled to utilize their 'kundalini' or 'DNA-awakening' in a selfhealing mode of 'thinking- and feeling- and intuiting-
and acting holistically'.
The 'messiah' is partnership and not individualistic - Man requires
Woman to BE HIMSELF and Woman requires Man to BE HERSELF.
My hope is, that
my grandchildren will grow into such a world, where at least some humans have attained this status. And the 'lake of fire
and brimstone' is PURE TANTRA; everything done below is also done above; open without lies and deceit or whatever. Your ears
ARE the ears of the Goddess and Mother of All. Your pain, ecstacy, musings, thoughts are those of God, the Father etc. etc.
in the selfimage of the mirror images becoming REAL as your partner.
The present
state of global affairs renders such musings rather futuristic and improbable of course. The logic and feasibility (in terms
of natural laws say) has however become established and I think my lifelong enmdeavours have helped in this noble cause and
purpose (even if noone can see this at the present time).
Hopefully this has
answered your query.
Tony B.
|
