This assembly of essays shall address the standard model of contemporary physics and
how it has become renewed by recent high-tech experiments and by Quantum Relativity.
Introduction
The physically manifest universe is observed, measured and analysed
by the most honourable discipline of physics; the 'Mother of all the sciences and wisdoms'.
This 'Gnosis of Sophia' can be known esoterically in a school of thought as HarlotA
PrincipiA PhysicA.
The spiritually manifest universe is experienced, unmeasured and philosophised by
the most honourable discipline of aphysics; the 'Father of all the sciences and wisdoms' and can be known in a school of gnostic
thought as DiabloS LogoS SpirituS.
The distinction above can then be considered as mutually exclusive
in a label of either/or describing 'actual reality' or as mutually inclusive in prescribing a duality in unity of sorts, yet
allowing a sense of primary and secondary manifestation.
The science of physics then attempts to describe a dynamic universe
of phenomena and content and a cosmology of interacting parameters mainly based on principles of energy and momentum coupled
to conservation laws.
Albeit, all such studies of dynamics fail to address the origins
of the systems themselves.
Where does the inherent rotation of universal systems derive from,
be it the spin of a quantum state or the rotation of bodies in astronomy? And where do the laws of nature and the conservation
principles derive from?
The language used to analyse and describe the physics of the matter is mathematics
in theory and experimental analysis and observation in practice.
But this science is like a metaphorical 'Tree of Science'.
A Seed of basics, say of integers, becomes a Root for a Stem from which Branches grow and Twigs and Flowers and Fruit.
So the Flowering of mathematics as the language of science has many avenues
of expression anmd the physics of the stem and the roots and the origins of the single seed become quickly obscurated by the
kaleidoscope of colour and specifications of the vocabularies used.
So can one describe the common seed of the physical reality without
the flowering and fruit-bearing tree?
Could one trace the 'birth of the offspring' of DiabloS LogoS
SpirituS and HarlotA PrincipiA PhysicA without Schroedinger's equation, Heisenberg matrices, Christoffel symbols, Lagrangians
and Hamiltonian Operators.
And notwithstanding the relevance of coordinate systems and metrics to
describe and predict the dynamics of bodies in space and in time; could one derive the beginnings of it all without even the
stem of mathematics, say in only using the sprouting of the seed into its basic roots?
These marked essays then, shall attempt to show the way for the
interested reader to gain a few insights as to the true nature of DiabloS LogoS SpirituS as the Father of all the sciences
and wisdoms and his image HarlotA PrincipiA PhysicA.
Recent experimental discoveries and descriptions shall be
utilized to show how the results extened and renew the Standard Models of Contemporary Physics and how this relates to the
'Roots of the Tree of Science'.
This line of approach should quieten the minds of skeptical enquirers, who denounce
anything associated with a label of 'spirit', as the subject matter is well established and of published results of experimental
measurement and henceforth physical reality.
This avenue of investigation and sharing, should also please the
mathematically undereducated, as the semantics used to describe the phenomena is of the status of the undergraduate.
So to foreclose the answer to the question; the physical reality
is the spiritual reality manifested.
Well, one might rename the adjective 'spiritual' by 'unified action'
of Diablos Logos Spiritus according to the omniscience of Quantum Relativity and the 'Unified Action' coupling the
DiabloS to the the HarlotA.
Postulate#1:
An arbitrary 'play of words' can form a mapping between such a
unity, say in the statement:
A=1=1bin=J=10=2bin=S=19=B*=28=...defining a certain order say A before B and 1 before
2.
This kind of ordering can also describe a circular 'measure' independent
of linear scale or space in the cyclicity of a linear sequence, as a number of ciphers mapped onto letters, say in the
26-tiered examples above.
Then the AAA precedes the SSS and the physical is primary to the
spiritual in the linear unfoldment; but the physical becomes secondary to the spiritual in a triplicity where A=1 and
J=1*and S=1**. Gnostically then, the Mother=1, the Son=2 and the Father=3 as the One.
This assembly of essays shall address the standard model of contemporary physics and
how it has become renewed by recent high-tech experiments and by Quantum Relativity.
MarkI1: (with acknowledgement to Hossein
Javadi of cph-group, who shared this on the forums):
ScienceDaily (Mar. 10, 2008)
— High-energy physicists devoted to recreating the conditions at the beginning of the universe have for the first time
observed a new way to produce those basic particles of atoms, protons and neutrons.
Confirming a decades-old prediction, the physicists with the CLEO collaboration
say they observed a rare and extremely short-lived subatomic particle with the unusual name of “charmed-strange meson”
decay into a proton and anti-neutron. Detection of the event, which the collaboration made public March
9, was attributed to John Yelton, a physicist at the University of Florida, one of many institutions that are part of the
CLEO collaboration. “It’s the sort of thing that, for many years, people have known should
happen,” Yelton said. “What we have done is show that it does, and how often.” The
Cornell Electron Storage Ring accelerator, or CESR, collides electrons with positrons at energies ranging from 3 to 5 billion
electron volts — producing many short-lived, elementary and rare particles of interest to physicists. CLEO, the large
experimental detector designed to detect the accelerator collisions, is a joint project of nearly two dozen institutions in
the U.S., Canada and England. Among the products of the CESR collisions are the charmed-strange mesons,
which exist for less than one-trillionth of a second before decaying into other more stable particles. Although charmed mesons
have been studied for 30 years, no one had ever observed one decaying into a proton or neutron, as theory had predicted. This
is notable because about 10 percent of all the collisions in the accelerator produce protons and neutrons. Yelton did not detect the anti-neutron directly but rather inferred its presence from data on energy and momentum of
other particles. All told, he found 13 instances of charmed-strange mesons decaying into protons and
anti-neutrons, retrieving and identifying those events from data on millions and millions of different collisions and their
aftermaths. Yelton based his analysis on techniques developed at Syracuse University for the detection
of two other types of rare subatomic particles, a muon and invisible neutrino. “Professor Yelton
did an extraordinary job of applying our techniques to a new area and extracted an excellent result in record time,”
said Sheldon Stone, co-spokesman for CLEO and the physics professor at Syracuse who, with graduate student Nabil Meena, first
developed the techniques. “This is what working together in an experiment is all about.” David
Asner, a physicist with Carleton University and CLEO’s other co-spokesperson, said the observation will contribute much
to theoretical work on particle decay. “Observation of these rare decays has the promise of increasing
our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of how the world is put together,” he said. When
CLEO was first started in 1979, CESR was among the highest energy accelerators operating at the time. More recent accelerators,
such as the Tevatron at Fermilab in Chicago and the soon-to-be-completed Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland, operate
at far higher energies. Most public attention is focused on research in these colliders — research aimed at, among other
things, observing the so-called “God” particle, the Higgs boson. Yelton said the latest
result shows there remains much to be learned from collisions at lower energy in lower energy colliders. “It highlights
the fact that there is still physics to be done at lower energy accelerators,” he said. The CLEO
collaboration has also submitted a paper on the discovery to the journal Physics Review Letters. The
National Science Foundation funded the bulk of the CESR hardware and operations. The research is funded by the NSF, the U.S.
Department of Energy, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the U.K. Science and Technology
Facilities Council. Source http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080310131525.htm
Commentary for MarkI1 by Tony B. of Quantum Relativity: This
article addresses a quark-mesonic system called the charm-antistrange meson c.s(bar).
A
proton has quark content u.u.d or up-up-down and a neutron has quark content u.d.d. An antiproton is given
as u(bar).u(bar).d(bar) and an antineutron as u(bar).d(bar).d(bar). A strange quark has fractional charge
-1/3 and is a excited or resonance eigenstate of the down-quark of the same charge content.
The
problem with the 'old' standard model is or was that it considers the charmed quark c as a unitary quark, albeit as a higher
energy state of the up-quark (of fractional charge +2/3). The charmed quark is actually a quark-system
of DoubleUp (or U) and up(bar); which in effect defines the 'resonance' energy state between up and charm.
So
a charmed antistrange mesonic coupling engages the U-diquark of fractional charge (+4/3) coupled to the antistrange quark
of +1/3 and mediated by an antiup quark of charge -2/3 for a manifested cs(bar) mesonic eigenstate of +1 charging.
But
taking the diquark nature of the charmed quark into account, rather naturally crystallizes the most basic baryonic
coupling between matter and antimatter, namely that between a proton and an antineutron. That is why this result has
been known for so long, but was difficult to experimentally ascertain; with the energy coupling between U and u(bar) being
hard to experimentally differentiate (Uu(bar)=c).
s(bar)=d*(bar)
defines the resonance bond of the weak interaction agent (W+) as antistrange quark. This is the maximum extent of the asymptotic
nuclear confinement zone, also known as the classical electron radius of so 2.8 fermi (10^-15 m).
So
iow, the weak nuclear interaction, signifying the decay of the cs(bar) in a strongweak interaction exchanging the W+ 'shrinks'
the s(bar) along a magnetoaxis of the quantum geometry in the release of 'binding' ZPE, given as the dd(bar) or uu(bar) base
mesonic (pion) energy template.
But the W+ does not materialise as a d*(bar),
but as a reduced d(bar) and our denotation cs(bar)=uu.u(bar).d(bar).dd(bar)=uud+u(bar)d(bar)d(bar); ergo the observed
and implied proton-antineutron coupling.
An important corollary is that
of the antiquark system c(bar)s.
This system would result in a antiproton-neutron
coupling and engage the W- weak interaction mediator. And this relates of course to the fundamental nonparity
of the weak interaction itself.
Only lefthanded matter particles couple to
the W- and only righthanded antimatter particles couple to the W+. This is basic to the decay of the strange kaon systems
ds(bar) and d(bar)s as the kaonic precursor to the mesons of charmed strangeness.
As
the transformation s->d* defines matter's W- and s(bar)->d*(bar) gives antimatter's W+ with associated neutrino-antineutrino
couplings; the dominance of matter over antimatter in cosmic occurrence crystallizes as the availability of the antineutrino-d*
coupling in predominance over the neutrino-d*(bar) coupling from a Higgs-template precursor.
Quantum
Relativity predicts, that the crystallisation of antiproton-neutron couplings should dominate the production of proton-antineutron
couplings in conjunction with antineutrino-neutrino productivity in a ratio of so 500:1 and the ds(bar) d(bar)s strange kaon
couplings.
Later essays shall readdress this topic under appropriate headings of
experimental discoveries.
Tony B.
MarkI2:
Physicists Discover 'Triple-scoop' Baryon
ScienceDaily (Jun. 13, 2007) — Physicists of the DZero experiment
at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have discovered a new heavy particle, the Ξb
(pronounced "zigh sub b") baryon, with a mass of 5.774±0.019 GeV/c2, approximately six times the proton mass. The
newly discovered electrically charged Ξb baryon, also known as the "cascade b," is made of a down, a strange
and a bottom quark. It is the first observed baryon formed of quarks from all three families of matter. Its discovery and
the measurement of its mass provide new understanding of how the strong nuclear force acts upon the quarks, the basic building
blocks of matter.
The DZero experiment has reported the discovery of the cascade b baryon in a paper submitted to Physical
Review Letters on June 12. "Knowing the mass of the cascade b baryon gives scientists information they need in order to
develop accurate models of how individual quarks are bound together into larger particles such as protons and neutrons," said
physicist Robin Staffin, Associate Director for High Energy Physics for the Department of Energy's Office of Science. The
cascade b is produced in high-energy proton-antiproton collisions at Fermilab's Tevatron. A baryon is a particle of matter
made of three fundamental building blocks called quarks. The most familiar baryons are the proton and neutron of the atomic
nucleus, consisting of up and down quarks. Although protons and neutrons make up the majority of known matter today, baryons
composed of heavier quarks, including the cascade b, were abundant soon after the Big Bang at the beginning of the universe.
The Standard Model elegantly summarizes the basic building blocks of matter, which come in three distinct families of
quarks and their sister particles, the leptons. The first family contains the up and down quarks. Heavier charm and strange
quarks form the second family, while the top and bottom, the heaviest quarks, make the third. The strong force binds the quarks
together into larger particles, including the cascade b baryon. The cascade b fills a missing slot in the Standard Model.
Prior to this discovery, only indirect evidence for the cascade b had been reported by experiments at the Large Electron-Positron
collider at the CERN Laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland. For the first time, the DZero experiment has positively identified
the cascade b baryon from its decay daughter particles in a remarkably complex feat of detection. Most of the particles produced
in high-energy collisions are short-lived and decay almost instantaneously into lighter stable particles. Particle detectors
such as DZero measure these stable decay products to discover the new particles produced in the collision. Once produced,
the cascade b travels several millimeters at nearly the speed of light before the action of the weak nuclear force causes
it to disintegrate into two well-known particles called J/Ψ ("jay-sigh") and Ξ- ("zigh minus"). The J/Ψ then
promptly decays into a pair of muons, common particles that are cousins of electrons. The Ξ- baryon, on the other hand,
travels several centimeters before decaying into yet another unstable particle called a Λ ("lambda") baryon, along with
another long-lived particle called a pion. The Λ baryon too can travel several centimeters before ultimately decaying
to a proton and a pion. Sifting through data from trillions of collisions produced over the last five years to identify these
final decay products, DZero physicists have detected 19 cascade b candidate events. The odds of the observed signal being
due to something other than the cascade b are estimated to be one in 30 million. Adapted from materials provided by
DOE/Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
APA
MLA
DOE/Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (2007, June 13). Physicists Discover 'Triple-scoop'
Baryon. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070613120947.htm
The Cascade-b particle
(žb) is short-lived. Once produced, it travels only several millimeters before the action of the weak nuclear force causes
it to disintegrate into two well-known particles called J/¨ and ž-. The J/¨ then promptly decays into a pair of muons,
common particles that are cousins of electrons. The ž- baryon, on the other hand, travels several centimeters before
decaying into yet another unstable particle called a › baryon, along with another long-lived particle called a pion.
The › baryon too can travel several centimeters before ultimately decaying to a proton and a pion. (Credit: Image courtesy
of DOE/Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory)
Commentary by Tony B.
of Quantum Relativity:
The 'heavy' baryons are
of course like resonance nucleons (protons and neutrons). The old standard model lists 6 flavours of quarks without explicit
diquark structures, while the new standard model has diquarks and only two quarks in the basic up and the basic down.
We now extend markI in
specifying the down-quark to contain the up-quark as a kernel-ring structure of quantum geometry ultimately defining the Higgsian
template.
In particular, the down-quark
of charge -1/3 consists of a unitary ringcharge of -1 to which is coupled the base kernel charge of the up-quark in +2/3. One
can picture this as a circle or vortex around a 'central nullpoint', where this 'singularity' is however spacetime extended
as a trisection of the enclosed area.
This is nought, but the
electromagnetic energy of a pointcharge or pointmass, such as an electron.
The total enclosed area
of the electron's position in spacetime so becomes a distribution of the fractional charges between the central 'point'
and the circumference given by the strange-quark, aka the weakon limit aka the classical electron radius.
The down-quark then defines
a mesonic ring charge of -1 as the spacetime 'size' for the electron and the strange quark gives the leptonic ring as
outer boundary.
The article above describes
a dbs baryon system of charge -1, which simplifies to d.ud.d* with the diquark ud coupled to an antiup in its basic eigenstate
for the b.u(bar)=ud.u(bar) as a resonance down quark.
The most basic concentration
of this ZPE or base-mesonic quark-antiquark pionic coupling energy is then:
dbs=d.ud.u(bar).d*=(u+mesonic
ring).u(u+mesonic ring).u(bar).d*, the s=d*=(u+leptonic ring) then initiates the weak interaction, whilst the strong
interaction engages the fractional inner mesonic charge distributions.
This strong (gluon-pion)
interaction between 3 u's of charge +2, a u(bar) of charge -2/3 and the two mesonic rings of charge -2 so isolate
a neutral particle (the blueprint for the lambda0), coupled to a leptonic ring of -1 with the antiup-quark of charge
-2/3 (the template for the pion-).
And this is precisely what
is experimentally observed (see diagram above). The strong interaction of 'trisectred' gluonic colourcharges is followed by
the electromagnetic decay of the cc(bar) followed by the weak decay of the negatively charged Xi hyperon.
The high energy eigenstate
of the cascase b-baryon derives from the charm-anticharm kernel coupling and a shortlived Xi- hyperon of quark content dss.
Exotic Relatives Of Protons And Neutrons Discovered
ScienceDaily (Oct. 23, 2006) - Scientists of the CDF collaboration
at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory announced today (October 23, 2006) the discovery of two
rare types of particles, exotic relatives of the much more common proton and neutron.
"These particles, named Sigma-sub-b [Σb], are like rare jewels that we mined out of our data," said
Jacobo Konigsberg, University of Florida, a spokesperson for the CDF collaboration. "Piece by piece, we are developing a better
picture of how matter is built out of quarks. We learn more about the subatomic forces that hold quarks together and tear
them apart. Our discovery helps complete the 'periodic table of baryons.'" Baryons (derived from the Greek word "barys",
meaning "heavy") are particles that contain three quarks, the most fundamental building blocks of matter. The CDF collaboration
discovered two types of Sigma-sub-b particles, each one about six times heavier than a proton. There are six different
types of quarks: up, down, strange, charm, bottom and top (u, d, s, c, b and t). The two types of baryons discovered by the
CDF experiment are made of two up quarks and one bottom quark (u-u-b), and two down quarks and a bottom quark (d-d-b). For
comparison, protons are u-u-d combinations, while neutrons are d-d-u. The new particles are extremely short-lived and decay
within a tiny fraction of a second. Utilizing Fermilab's Tevatron collider, the world's most powerful particle accelerator,
physicists can recreate the conditions present in the early formation of the universe, reproducing the exotic matter that
was abundant in the moments after the big bang. While the matter around us is comprised of only up and down quarks, exotic
matter contains other quarks as well. The Tevatron collider at Fermilab accelerates protons and antiprotons close to the
speed of light and makes them collide. In the collisions, energy transforms into mass, according to Einstein's famous equation
E=mc2. To beat the low odds of producing bottom quarks--which in turn transform into the Sigma-sub-b according to the laws
of quantum physics--scientists take advantage of the billions of collisions produced by the Tevatron each second. "It's
amazing that scientists can build a particle accelerator that produces this many collisions, and equally amazing that the
CDF collaboration was able to develop a particle detector that can measure them all," said CDF cospokesperson Rob Roser, of
Fermilab. "We are confident that our data hold the secret to even more discoveries that we will find with time." The CDF
experiment identified 103 u-u-b particles, positively charged Sigma-sub-b particles (Σ+b), and 134 d-d-b particles, negatively
charged Sigma-sub-b particles (Σ-b). In order to find this number of particles, scientists culled through more than 100
trillion high-energy proton-antiproton collisions produced by the Tevatron over the last five years. In a scientific presentation
on Friday, October 20, CDF physicist Petar Maksimovic, professor at Johns Hopkins University, presented the discovery to the
particle physics community at Fermilab. He explained that the two types of Sigma-sub-b particles are produced in two different
spin combinations, J=1/2 and J=3/2, representing a ground state and an excited state, as predicted by theory. Quark theory
predicts six different types of baryons with one bottom quark and spin J=3/2 (see graphic). The CDF experiment now accounts
for two of these baryons. CDF is an international experiment of 700 physicists from 61 institutions and 13 countries.
It is supported by the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and a number of international funding agencies.
(The full list can be found at http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/collaboration/Funding_Agencies.html.) Using the Tevatron, the CDF and DZero collaborations at Fermilab discovered the top quark, the final and most massive quark,
in 1995. Fermilab is a national laboratory funded by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy, operated
under contract by Universities Research Association, Inc. Adapted from materials provided by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
APA
MLA
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (2006, October 23). Exotic Relatives Of Protons And
Neutrons Discovered. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061023192702.htm
Six quarks -- up, down, strange, charm, bottom and top -- are the building blocks of matter. Protons and
neutrons are made of up and down quarks, held together by the strong nuclear force. The CDF experiment has discovered exotic
relatives of the proton and neutron, particles that include a bottom quark. (Image courtesy of DOE/Fermi National Accelerator
Laboratory)
Commentary by Tony B. of Quantum Relativity:
The Standard Model (SM) above is simplified in introducing the diquark structure already mentioned in marksI1
and I2.
This by the way perfectly preserves the SU(2,3) Unitary Symmetries of the old SM. The thread above describes
baryonic eigenstates where the ordinary down-quark is substituted by a resonance b-quark.
But we already know, that the old SM is now beginning to catch up with the new SM due to the greatly improved
experimental techniques, which are now are producing the diquark couplings.
We know, that the b-quark is a diquark ud coupled to an antiup-quark and constituent from the Higgsian template.
Subsequently, the experimental discoveries of the uub and the ddb are simple expressions of the diquarkian
nature of the physical reality for us.
In particular, we can use this model to predict the decay patterns of the heavy baryons.
The uub=uuud.u(bar)=uud+uu(bar) so decays in forming a quarkian ring disassociating the uu(bar) as basic
pion ZPE coupled to a proton.
Similarly, the ddb=ddud.u(bar) must have the base decay product of a neutron udd coupled to the u(bar)d of a
pion-.
Even the sigma labelling for this heavy baryons is appropriate, as the positively charged sigma uus represents
the SU(3) member of a basic baryon octet, with the neutral sigma uss forming its 'neutron' hyperonisation.
The SU(3) relates 8 gluonic eigenstates as a single superimposed gluonic eigenstate of the Higgs trisection.
If we denote the quark-antiquark coupling as the base pionic ZPE (or VPE for Vortex-Potential-Energy); then
we have 2x2=4 couplings of gluonic colourcharges in say colour and anticolour.
The colours are Red-Green-Blue with corresponding anticolours Cyan-Magenta-Yellow.
If now unitisation in energy is defined in 'colourcharge mixing', then either colour+anticolour or the combination
of either triplicity will unify the colours as either in White Energy of Planck-Radiation E=hf or as Black Energy of Einstein-Mass
E=mc^2.
The White Energy eigenstate then will be ascertained in a baryonic quark triplet WWW and the Black Eigenstate
in triplet BBB with 6 intermediate hybrid energy eigenstates or gluoinic permutations WWB, WBW, BWW, BBW, BWB and WBB. There
are thus 2x2x2=8 gluonic eigenstates.
SU(2) gives BB and WW and the hybrids BW and WB correspondingly.
When a massive eigenstate of baryonic BBB or mesonic BB is obtained, then the experimental measurement devices
register a mass parameter and for WWW or WW a radiation mensuration, say light is registered.
The respective decay rates for the elementary interactions are subsequently described by the hybrid states.
Tony B.
Enter content here
Enter content here
Enter content here
MarkII1: A Seedling Cosmology in Quantum Relativity (QR)
(with acknowledgement to Hossein Javadi, who first posted this article
on the forums)
Written by Ian O'Neill It is widely accepted that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) sit in the centre of elliptical galaxies or bulges of spiral
galaxies. They suck in as much matter as possible, generating blasts of radiation. Stars, gas and everything else nearby forms
a compact "halo" and then falls to a gravitationally enforced death spiral. The greedy nature and the sheer size of these
black holes have led to the idea that dark matter may supply (or may have supplied) the SMBH with some mass during its evolution.
But could it be that dark matter may not be significantly involved after all? This might be one cosmic phenomenon
dark matter can't be blamed for…
Black hole accretion disks
are compact halos created as dust, gas and other debris are pulled toward a black hole event horizon. Accretion disks
radiate electromagnetic radiation, and the frequency of which depends on the mass of the black hole. The more massive it is,
the higher the energy of radiation emitted into space. In the case of a SMBH, the huge mass causes very bright emission as
the matter from the accretion disk falls into the event horizon (the point at which gravity becomes so strong that even light
cannot escape). As accretion disk matter falls toward the event horizon, approximately 10% of the mass is converted into energy
and ejected as X-rays. This is a far more efficient energy conversion rate than the most efficient nuclear fusion reaction
(approximately 0.5%). This X-ray emission can then be observed, creating a quasar, signifying a SMBH is driving the active
galaxy. Interestingly, an SMBH is not thought to be formed from single dead massive star. They are thought to have been created
from a "seed" and then grown over billions of years. The source of the mass feeding the growing SMBH comes from its accretion
disk, but it is uncertain what form the matter comes in and at what rate it "feeds" the black hole. There are several possibilities
as to how the largest black holes were seeded, but two are the most widely accepted:
Intermediate black holes (with masses of several thousand Suns) are created by vast clouds which collapse to a single
point. Black holes form and accretion disks grow.
Massive primordial stars (the first stars, formed only 200 million years after the Big Bang) of a few hundred Sun masses may have collapsed to create
smaller black holes, again forming accretion disks and growing over billions of years.
The mechanisms affecting
the rate of accretion disk growth are not so clear-cut. Some theories suggest that huge quantities (most of the black hole
mass) comes from dark matter. However, as dark matter is "non-baryonic" (i.e. the opposite to baryonic matter - the matter
we know, love and observe in our universe) it will emit very little radiation as it falls into the black hole event horizon. If this is
the case, SMBHs would grow disproportionately when compared with radiation emitted from galactic centres (only baryonic particles
will emit X-rays). New research headed by Sebastien Peirani (at the Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, France) suggests
only a very small fraction of a SMBH is composed from dark matter as it evolved. Dark matter is predicted to be collisionless
and will be scattered very easily by baryonic gas clouds and stars. It seems unlikely that dark matter will be able to stay
inside the black hole's accretion disk for very long before it is repelled by all the "normal" matter being pulled toward
the event horizon. Source http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/08/greedy-supermassive-black-holes-dislike-dark-matter/
The article above has identified the cosmology of QR in a number of statements. For one the so called
'dark matter' or 'missing mass' is realised to not be baryonic and secondly the seeding mechanism for the mass distribution
in the very early universe is thought to stem from primordial protostars.
The universe according to QR, was indeed seeded by such protostars, which are described as ylemic
neutron stars as a function of temperature, independent on mass, but allowing the introduction of inertial parameters for
the masses of Black Holes as basic solutions for the spacetime curvature in the Schwarzschild metric of General Relativity.
The dilemma of the 'dark matter' and the 'dark energy' become extensions of the Standard Models
(SMs) of both the standard Big Bang cosmology and the particle physics (see markI essays) in Quantum Relativity.
It is found, that the 'dark matter' is no 'new inertia carrying particle' of the old SM, but a consequence
of the initial equilibrium equations for the Big bang cosmogony. This also describes the 'dark energy' as being necessitated
by such boundary conditions.
In particular, the equivalence principle in General Relativity (GR) defines the 'missing mass' as
gravitational mass, equivalent to a nonmaterialised inertial mass.
But we begin in describing the seeding of the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator and in very
good agreement with the standard Big Bang Cosmology.
This universe is mass-parametric, meaning it follows the thermodynamic expansion of a cosmology,
which will attain a cooling Black Body Radiation Background of absolute Zero kelvin after an evolution in infinite linear
time.
This universe began at 0 entropy or 'absolute order' and increases its 'disorder' asymptotically
in its expansion towards higher entropy and a cooling off.
Now the initial- and boundary conditions for this 'total order' are of course related mathematically
to the ideas of infinity and a null-state, which become physical approximations via the aforesaid asymptotic expansion.
The boundary conditions are however applied to ensure a perfect equilibrium throughout this massparametric
evolution and a consequence of those is that the 'missing mass' amnd the 'missing energy' are not really missing, but are
under a process of self transformation of related parameters.
So one can invoke the existence of a baryonic mass seedling which depicts a Daughter-Black
Hole or DBH and which functions under the auspices of a Mother-Black Hole or MBH, which adds the 'missing mass' to the DBHs
in summation.
This state of affairs results in an isotropic cosmology, which defines the DBHs as galactic seeds,
say and which so form an isotropic and homogeneous background under what is known as the cosmological principle.
The MBH precedes the DBHs in a process termed the inflationary de Broglie phase of the universe.
In QR, this becomes a string epoch, lasting just 3.33x10^-31 seconds into the cosmogony and ending in the thermodynamic
universe under the postulates and premises of General Relativity (GR), where a large scale classical spacetime geometry supplements
the quantum geometry of the string epoch.
So there is then a difference between these epochs. The string epoch is scale restricted to a displacement
from the mathematical null state of the 'singularity' to the well known Planck Scale.
The difference between the string physics of the status quop and the string physics utilised by
QR is however that the string scale itself undergoes transformation from the
Planck-String (of open/closed dual classI) to a Weyl-String (of heterotic closed class 8x8); the
latter defining the onset of the thermodynamic universe of GR and the end of the string epoch as mentioned above.
The null state of the mathematical singularity so becomes approximated in the 'absolute order' of
a nonphysical entity, which then defines boundary conditions to 'seed' the nonexistent physical universe to be born in the
'Big Bang' and with it birthing the parameters of any metric spacetime following the de Broglie inflation.
Iow, this 'time instant' inflates the Weyl-Seed of a transformed Planck-length into a precise event
horizon of a MBH.
This MBH has 'more mass' than the collection of all the DBHs contained within it and 'yet to be
born' via the primordial neutron stars.
Furthermore, this MBH's mass is gravitational and not yet inertial. It is defined in precise metrics of GR as the critical
density for the universe to render the cosmos Eucl
