The Dawn of Space and Time in a Selfconscious Quantum Universe
The Origin of Mass in the Quantum Gravitational Electron
Home
The Key to Interdimensional Physics post 2012
V
April in Wonderland aka Alice in Mirrorland aka Cosmology 101
The Collective Human Race is the Messiah for the Universe
Quantum Immortality
Relativity of Time and UFOs
Dark Stars
The WaveParticle Electron and its Spacial Consciousness
The Solution to Schroedinger's Cat Paradox
Panentheism
Dreams, the Soul and the Shadow-Self
Tibetean 2012 and a Message from Hunab Ku at the Center of the Milky Way Galaxy
Some Elementary Foundations on the Physics of Black Holes
Man on the Moon - Reality or Hoax?
The Newtonian Forcelaw extension as a Quantum Interaction
Genesis and The Gospel of Thomas
The Poem of Malachi
The Secret of Humanity
Discourses on Jesus of Nazareth
The Axiomatic Incompleteness of God and the Hole in the Earth
A Scientific Definition for the 'Universal Intelligence' aka 'God'
Does the God of John Clayton Exist?
The Reconfigured postwarped Universe of 2012/2013
Isaac Newton's Dream of Alchemy and the 28BC-2013 Timeline
The Devil Delusion versus the God Delusion
First Imagine It - then Image It!
Our physical universe is a derivative of metaphysical mathematics
Positronium and Quarks
Universal Memory and the Alien Observer from Akbar-Ra
Big Bang Cosmology
If the Sun would go supernova,..., then the design of the universe would appear...
Harptherapy
Cosmological Distance Measurements
The Meaning of Life
Getting off the Fence and the Dark Crystal
Giant Jellyfish invades Earth
MOND and Newtonian Gravity
Gauge Unification Physics
The Cosmic Lattice aka the Light-Matrix of High Definition
Infinity and Eternity for the Ordering of Time Before, Now and After
Mayan Cosmology in the 21st Century
Papillon#1
Universal Gauges
Q&A by Alf Tail and Ome Head
Photons and Phonons
The Brain and Schroedinger's Cat
A Letter from Spain
The Reading of the Sealed Book
The Stan Romanek Equations
Lan Johnson's Utopia
Monatomic Superconductivity in the the Alchemy of the Stability of the Nucleus
Nobel Prizes 1998 and 2004 in elementary physics
The 'Old Zion' and the 'New Zion' and the Pentagrammons
Future Shadows in the Time of Now
Children of Babylon
The Rotational Dynamics in Haramein-Rauscher Metrics and the Monopolic Current
A Newtonian-Einstein-De Sitter Universe in Cosmological Mirror-Supersymmetry
The Newtonian-Einstein-de Sitter Universe in Cosmological Mirror-Supersymmetry
The Nature and Origin of the Dark Energy and the Cosmological Constant
Cultural Worship - Old and New
The Fractal Earth as Universal Focus
Many Worlds within the One Shadowed Quantum Universe
A Course in Miracles and Edgar Cayce!
Revisitation of Library Posts
The Transformation of Modern Science into Omni-Science
Fundamental Algorithmic Constants for the Physical Universe
The Agony of All That Is!
Hydrinos, Supermembranes and the 'Free Energy' of the 4th Dimension!
Being and Existence and a 'We Becoming' of a Pearl!
The Mystery of Gravitation and the Elementary Graviton String - Quantum Gravity 101
Protoverse + Multiverse = Omniverse
Obama's Isomorphism and the Timeline 28AD-70AD-2008AD
The Return of the Boanerges!
The Shroud of Turin
The Mystery of the Sphinx in the Circle of Time and the Metamorphosis of Humanity by 2012
Fractalised String Lifeforms, Galaxies and Stars
Maria Odete aka Barbelo aka the archetypical Ovum aka aka
Radiationmass and the Mind-Body Duality
The Old White Earth and its New Black Shadow
The 'Alien' Science behind Roswell 1947!
Evolution and Cosmic DNA Design
The Basic Higgs Boson Configuration!
The LightBody and the Fifth Gauge
The Nature of the Intelligent Designer
The 13-dimensional Mayan LightMatrix
Special Information Dispensation I
Cosmic Twinship and Human Prehistory
Cosmic Twinship and Egypt
The Mayan Warpgate of 2012
Intelligent Designs in the Mayan Annals
Mayan Education upon New Earth Serpentina
Mayan Water-Science and Antigravity in Dragon-Space
The Solution for the Psychophysical Reality in M-Theory
2012 - The Year of the Dragon and Mayan HyperSpace
Tibetean 2012
The Popul Vuh in Human History
The Serpentine Electron in Space and in Time
The Little Serpent in Space and in Time
In Lake'ch - The Primal Energy
The New Earth Present
In La'kech - I Am Another Yourself!
The Popul Vuh also known as "The Book of Life"
Physical Consciousness Defined in Metric Tetrahedral Spacetimes of Entropy and Magnetic Gravita
The Illuminatia
A New View of God and Alien Physics
The Standard Superparadigm Refined - Russell and Kant and QR
Cellular Consciousness/Dr. Bruce Lipton and Dr. Rupert Sheldrake
Why every baby born is a fractal universe of the cosmic collective Consciousness
Elaine Pagels and Gnosticism
The Shroud of Turin and the Vinland Map
Scriptural Inconsistencies and the Meaning of Gnosis
The Seat of the 'Soul' and of whales and mites
The God-Particle of Von Higgs
The charge distributions of quarks within nucleons
The Origin of Mass in the Quantum Gravitational Electron
The universe is unified in its twinship and the 'Hand of God'
tba
Blank page
A Thought Experiment to revisit the Big Bang
Elementary String Cosmology and Quantum Geometry
The Question of Time in a Quantum Universe
Neutron Stars, Black Holes and Gamma Ray Bursters
The Selfaware Universe
Reformulation of the Hubble Law in General Relativity
Origins of Life in pentagonal crystal stuctures
Where did we come from?
The Crossing of the Boundary of the Void
What is physical reality?
The Scientist, the Believer and the Gnostic
Deepak Copra versus Michael Shermer on the Afterlife
Does God exist - Co-Darwinian Evolution.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall
Zero Point Energy and the Higgs Field
The Mass of the Higgs Boson and the Mass Induction of the Weakons
The Trinity
Frequency and DNA
The Secret of Mass-Transduction and Inverse Action
The LightMatrix
The "God-Particle'
The transcendental number e
A perhaps simple way to understand the relativity of time
Ex Nihilo
The E(8x8) Octonion Structure of the Universe
The Higgs Template revealed
The Higgs Boson revealed
A SciAm Mathematics puzzle with deeper significance
Message of Introduction
The Mapping of the Atomic Nucleus onto the Solar System
Why is there Something rather than Nothing?
Yaldabaoth Saklas Samael or Jehovah's blind foolishness creates Order in YaHWHeY's MATHIMATIA=95=59
The Book of the Prophets
Biophysics, Physical Consciousness and Mitogenetic Radiation
Don Quixote's Windmill
Quagecoms
A Mirror of the Orgins is Not So Far Away!?
Genesis - Where is the God of Science? - The Death of the Supernaturality Virus!
Stringed Consciousness and the Planck-Nugget
The Holographic Universe and Spacetime Creation
Library of Quantum Relativity and the Cosmogenesis I
Introduction to the Theory of Quantum Relativity
Quantum Relativity
Newton's Gravitational Constant
The Stability of the Electron and its missing mass in QED
blank page
Serpentina
Serpentina
The Book of the Dragons - Post 2012 AD Manifesto
The Fable of Little Adam and the Rooster's Egg
My Visit of Hell - Another Kind of Dantean Inferno
Judgement Day or The Leaf on the Tree
The Land of the Dead
Poetry of Omniscience
The Parable of the Sandpit & We Becoming of a Gnostic Charm
Boundary Parameters in Quantum Relativity under Modular Duality
On the Origins and Al Qaeda of Theoretical Physics
PentagonalCurtisDNA
Algorithmic Gravity


Hi All!
 
This is a most important post to me and this is written plainly with a link to the University of Texas, where Maxwell's Displacement Current is analysed. This will allow anyone wishing to investigate further to do so.
 
The equations are crucial to show where the inertial mass comes from.

So I shall continue in this post to describe the general cosmology as it occurred relative to the paradigm of Quantum Relativity.
This post will be of immense importance and shall prove of profound interest to future cosmologists and physicists. It will allow a number of techniques to test the data given in this essay by well designed experiments.

First of all, I would like to give honorary mention to William MacArthur aka Mac, who is active on a number of these forums, a retired biologist and science teacher, residing in Queensland, Australia.

Mac has written extensively on the topic, which I am about to discuss under his titles of: "The Gravitational Electron" and similar; discussing a possible unification scenario between gravitation and electromagnetism. Mac's papers can be found on a multitude of forum libraries for anyone interested in someone else's realisations as to the 'logically selfconsistent' and 'correct' cosmology. And William MacArthur is an excellent teacher of scientific principles and I hope, that the amateur reader can follow his style of authorship somewhat better and easier, than my expositions.

Mac has independently from myself, I might say, and dating to an earlier time period in the 1970's and 1980's used the 'Gravitational Electron' to relate the electron's inertial and noninertial properties, meaning its mass and its Coulombic charge content respectively. He correctly applied the relationship between dimensionless finestructures for those parameters, but then failed to extrapolate those parameters into the Planck parameters of the string epoch.

QR uses the same theoretical basis, but then takes the consequences much further and avoids certain theoretical 'cul de sacs', which imo prevented Mac to pursue his theoretically well established facts much further. But I give honorary mention here, because Mac's idea of the gravitational electron as a quantum Black Hole proves decisive in the QR paradigm. Mac had the intuitive eureka moment, but then became sidetracked by applying the appropriate formalism of Special Relativity in an 'inappropriate' manner; such as 'gravitational time dilation' over cosmic chronological time and a subsequent 'infinite recessional' time specifying the Big Bang.

So I shall begin to describe the cosmology in words and without equations for the casual, but scientifically informed reader. Only after this 'story' has been told, will I 'fill in the gaps' with the actual formulations.

Where does mass come from?

The supposed Big Bang has happened so 14 Billion years ago, the casual reader is told from the echelons of the academic establishment!
All the energy of the universe and everything, which now constitutes the cosmos and including space and time originated in this Big Bang, the pundits state and since spacetime itself was created then, a point of nothingness or a mathematical singularity began to expand outwards and filled the cocreated spacetime with matter and antimatter and the parameters of the physical sciences.

The dynamics for this cosmological expansion is found in the laws of thermodynamics, of kinetic energy and momentum conservation and the 'arrow of entropy'.
Basically, the Big Bang Cosmology describes a Planck Radiator as a 'Perfect Black Body' which in expanding, also cools down and in this process of Temperature dispersion, also gains in disorder or entropy.
The energy of the singularity so was extremely 'hot' and would be infinite for a true physical point-singularity in 0 dimensions; but would be very large, yet finite in a 'smearing out' or fuzziness or 'uncertainty fluctuation' about this 'Point-Space'.

Mathematical models, such as Quantum-Loop-Gravity, String-Theory or Quantum-Foam-Metrics then become ever more elaborate in complexities and technical detail to describe this Planckian Black Body in the metricated physicality of the reality of the material universe.
This universe is then observed and measured as such in quantities such as displacement or length, temporal time, mass and the postulated charges associated with mass to allow laws of attraction and repulsion to interact between constituents, such as atome, molecules, bodies, stars and galaxies.

When the phyicist, mathematician or researcher uses the formulations of the parameters, describing the basic physical quantities; certain paradoxes seem to emerge.

A major paradox relates the parameter of the 'lightest particle' which is conclusively measured by scientists - namely the electron.

Experiments clearly indicate, that the electron is a 'point-particle' of no or very limited apparent spacial extent (currently postulated to be of a radius smaller than about 10-19 metres say). Yet the very successful theory of Quantum-Electro-Dynamics or QED, clearly indicates, that the 'preferred' scale of the electron's manifestation is a so called Classical Electron Radius (CER=Re). The entire dynamics of electron-photon interaction for example falls beautifully into place, if this CER permeates the physics from the subatomic realm of the Electron's Compton-Radius to the atomic realm of the Hydrogen Atom in the First Bohr Radius to the Ryberg Spectra, which then extend the basic hydrogenic proton to the higher elements.
I shall give those interrelated formulations later, but they all have a common factor in the Alpha-Finestructure Constant, which determines the interaction probability between mass and light (or electromagnetic radiotion in the form of photons).

So without further ado; the reason for this dilemma in regards to the 'size of the electron' is the gravity of the electron as a function of its mass and primordially the emergence of the electronmass from its stringed 'premass'.

We have encountered the PREMASS in the previous 'parent' essay on the Big Bang revisitation.
We have said there, that the notion of GRAVITATION manifests as the curvature of spacetime a la General Relativity as a third modulation; the second modulation being the introduction of MASS to cause this GRAVITATION, necessary in the first modulation of a LIMIT for the invariance of the lightpath as the unitary assumption for the entire cosmology.

The fourth modulation is however the cause of the CURVATURE from first principles, that is the topology for the universe without any mass. This becomes the Quantum Geometry of QR, which somehow relates to the Classical Geometry of GR by necessity.

And the details of this solve the 'Gravitational Electron' problem and with it the rest of the apparent cosmological paradoxes, known under labels such as the horizon-, the monopole-, the lambda-, and the 'you-name-it'-problem.

So the story in words is this.

The 'Point-Space' of the Null Dimension becomes 'fuzzy' or 'smeared out' in a Principle of Uncertainty (HUP after Werner Heisenberg).
How does this happen?
The HUP makes the abstract mathematics physical.
The universe is DEFINED in something including the 'Natural Laws', which is METAPHYSICAL and inclusive of whatever any or all mathematical formalisms can invent or discover or rediscover. A distinction between the latter is unnecessary, as the idea of chronological time of past, present and future emerges as a physical property and so is not causative of some other notion of time, which only requires a mathematical principality of ORDER.

So then the fuzzy singularity becomes physical and requires some rather peculiar properties to manifest the thermodynamic Big Bang in the Planck Black Body Radiator model.

If the universe has some required critical mass today to close it in a flat curvature; and as it is observed by the experiments; then all this mass must be in the 'fuzzy' singularity, which must be very very small by necessity of its own fuzziness and the HUP.

The universe so uses Nature's 'Big Trick'. This 'Big Trick' is called Modular Duality and this is not a new thing under the sun.
The basic mathematical principle can be seen in the physics of simple optics, in say the focalisation of images in convex and concave lenses and mirrors. Some images are real, others are virtual, some images are upright and others are inverted, such as in the retina in the eye. Those optics also apply to a 'Cosmological Principle of Holography' and this in modern terminology by renown physicists such as Leonard Susskind for example.

So the primal physical application of Modular Duality becomes that of relating the Mirror-Dimension of the 11D Hubble-Node to the 'fuzzy' Planck-Singularity.
The latter defines the smallest 'physicality' in a so called Planck-Length, a Planck-Time, a Planck-Temperature and a Planck-Energy and so on.

In particular we find here the PRECURSOR for our Planck Black Body Radiator in the so called Zero-Point-Enery of a minimum Quantum Energy Eigenstate EPlanck=½hf and where h is Planck's Constant and f stands for a physical parameter called frequency. Let us call this minimum ZPE-Energy Eigenstate, the Planck-Oscillator.

So our 'fuzzy' singularity becomes physical in a say, transformed Planck-Oscillator, then specifying entire spectra of energy eigenstates, such as in the formulations in quantum mechanics and its 'wavefunctions'.

The Modular Duality as 'Nature's Mastertrick' now does the following.
The singularity - now finitised - becomes MODULAR DUALISTIC to its MIRROR singularity.
What is this mirrored singularity?

It is the LIMIT of our Hubble-Event-Horizon as the Hubble-Node, where we 'modularily dualise' a maximum mass with a minimum mass.

This minimum mass IS NOT the Planck-Mass, as the Planck-Mass is so 1.6x10-8 kilograms and which is rather larger, than the mass of a subatomic particle say.

So one of the conundrums in modern physics is, how the Planck-Oscillator can represent the minimum eigenstate in mass.
It can do so in displacement, specifying the Planck-Length as so 2x10-35 meters and as say the 'fuzzy realised' radius redefining the singularity of the 'Point-Space'.

The minimum mass is the mass of the electron at so 9x10-31 kilograms however as the smallest known inertial mass known to physics.

{The neutrino masses are constituent of the electron mass in the tau generation in QR and so cannot be used as this minimum; and especially as QR predicts the electron- and muon neutrino generations to be massless as base neutrino classes}.

So the situation for the Planck-Oscillator becomes an expanding thermodynamic universe with a duality mapping between the mass total of the universe and the mass of a singular electron mapped onto the Hubble-Event-Horizon.


Using Special Relativity and the actual definitions for the electron's parameters, the details are derived in due course; but with the result described in a physics of Black Hole Cosmology.

The electron as a GRAVITATIONAL and NONINERTIAL RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON is the parent electron for the INERTIAL RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON of QED and the massparameters of the manifested Planck-Oscillator as the Planck-Black Body Radiator.

This gravitational electron has noninertial mass, meaning, that it is defined in a curvature scenario for the universe before the mass via m=E/c2 manifested in even a single electron.

The Hubble-Radius defines a MOTHER-BLACK HOLE, which is 'collapsed' at the Planck-Oscillator singularity and which as such an extremal Black Hole forms a boundary or initial condition and does not Hawking radiate. It so serves as an invariant for the proceeding thermodynamic cosmic evolution.

Now because this Mother-BH is by definition a spherical boundary; set by a string-epoch in chronological time, which 'inflated' the Planck-Oscillator's Planck-Scale to the Hubble-Scale; it by the principle of modular duality must also define a particular Planck-Oscillator scale.

And that scale is the physics of the Gravitational Electron as a Planckian-String-BH with Schwarzschild Radius Ro say.

This then is the reason as to why the Planck-Oscillator can carry the entire mass of the universe required for its sperical closure at the 'smeared out' singularity.

Mathematically, the 'Point-Space' becomes physically 'real' as the Planck-String. The latter transforms into less energetic Planck-Strings with the effect of an increasing 'Planck-Length' and a decreasing Planck-Mass, because this displacement scale is defined in say the Compton Radius or de Broglie Radius of matter waves in QED and where mass m is inversely proportional to the wavelength (λ) via m=h/λc.

The 'Point-Space' is however completely defined and physicalised in terms of the lightpath x=ct, which became 'inflated' in a de Broglie phase transition defining the string epoch to be the mirrored 'Point-Space' as the Hubble-Event-Horizon.

So you the reader and the entire universe resides within a Mother-BH.

The crucial matter in this scenario is however the 'Size of the Electron'. How big is the gravitational electron?
It is the modular dual of the Mother-BH, which is closed with the mass total of the universe defining its parameters in the Schwarzschild metric.
The gravitational electron also has a Schwarzschild Radius and one which is vastly smaller than the Planck-Length in so 2.3x10-57 meters. So all the physical models, which use the Planck-Length as a minimum for the physical spacetime metrics become inapplicable.

But here Mother Nature uses its modular trickery once again.

The gravitational electron becomes itself 'fuzzy' and 'smeared out' as the entire surface area of the Mother-BH and so never manifests as a physical inertial 'particle'. The gravitational electron itself becomes MASSLESS as an extremal Black Hole, also known as a 'Strominger Brane' in 11-dimensional brane theory.

But this of course, allows the modular duality to state the next 'strange' but absolutely necessary condition.

The Mother-BH is also MASSLESS as a Strominger-Brane and subject to evolution in any number of DAUGHTER-BHs, which are not boundary- or initial conditions and so subject to transformation in energy exchanges as in Hawking radiation.

And this is what we require; as we have said, that the mass total of the universe is situated at the singularity and yet is massless simultaneously.
The Black Hole Cosmology then crystallises the experimentally observed parameters in terms of cosmological redshift and the Einstein-Friedmann-Walker-de Maitre Cosmologies and the like; albeit inclusive of a demetrication for the scalefactors to allow the mass-independent definition for the overall cosmic topology to establish itself.

In particular the BH-Evolution becomes a function for the dimensionless cycletime or Now-Time for the lightpath intersection described in the parent paper on the Big Bang thought experiment.

The physics, will describe the harmonic, meaning equilibriumised emergence of more complex cosmic structures in the Planck Black Body Radiator filling the prespace created by the de Broglie wavematter inflation.

A first manifestation of the Mother-BH will occur 236.5 Million years into the cosmology; where at a redshift of z=7.477, a 'quasar-wall' is established.
This will instigate a significant phase transition in the first 'seeding' of the cosmos in homogenuity and isotropy; meaning things look and are the same in all directions, without 'irregularities' such as a star or a galaxy.

The Superclusters of galaxies will then specify the large scale geometry for the universe in the Sarkar-BH, which has precisely the mass required to seed the entire universe baryonically; meaning in terms of the protons and neutrons, which constitute the observed mass in the cosmologies.

A paradox in cosmology, namely how the observed superclusters could form so early in a young universe under their mutual gravity, so becomes elucidated as the coupling of the Sarkar-BH to sub-supercluster galactic evolution.

It will be shown, how a basic neutron mass then coupled to an EFFECTIVE and then inertial electronmass as a function of the Planck-Mass itself.
We will find a googol count of spacetime quanta, which are of course the Planck-Oscillators as the ZPE of the Standard Models.

Then the Sarkar-Mass will become defined in the subatomic parameters, showing how the quantum physics relates to the classical physics.

But this Sarkar-BH differs from the Mother-BH in that the Sarkar-BH is physically observable in the MANIFESTED mass (albeit with missing energy) of actual galactic superclusters.

The Mother-BH has no mass and also has the total mass required for its positive curvature and so cannot be observed from within. And as ANY observer is located cosmically at the singularity of the Mother-BH; any physical observer is in its cosmic womb, as yet 'unborn' (into the 12th dimension say).

We shall also derive the electron's inertial mass and revisit other cosmological scenarios as required.

To 'prove' all this mathematically, using the well-established and textbook available parameters; will be the next exercise.

Tony B.
 
 
There exists a most important issue in quantum mechanics, namely the stability of the electron and the nature of its mass. QED postulates the electron as a point-particle of a size smaller than 10-18 metres; yet the extremely successful calculations in Quantum ElectroDynamics or QED are required to 'scale up' the electron to its 'classical' size of Re so 3x10-15 metres.
Postulating a 'Dirac Sea' of 'virtual particles' within this classical electron radius, the electron should be unstable due to the repulsion of the 'virtual electrons' of that 'uncertainty soup'.

Re=ke²/mec²= Alpha.h/2πmec²    (1)

and where kG=1 in modular duality as described elsewhere and k=1/4πεo and Alpha=2πke²/hc.

We begin in assigning the Planck-Oscillator as the Gravitational Electron Mass me as a noninertial string energy in terms of the electric permittivity εo.



EPlanck=½hf=½mec²=Gme²/Ro       (2)

and where Ro  is the Schwarzschild Radius for the gravitational electron. We here see straight away, that combining (1) and (2) will define the electron's Schwarzschild Radius: Ro=2Gme²/c² and relate the CER to the latter in (3).

Ro/2Re=Gme²/ke²=G²me²/e²      (3)

The unification condition kG=1 now requires a crucial identity for dimensional consistency between the Planck- or String parameters.
One knows, that the Newtonian Force-Law expression is dimensionally consistent with the Coulomb Force-Law expression (both measuring force units in Newtons); but that the 'charge e' in the Coulomb-Law becomes the 'mass m' in the Gravity-Law.
Using the kG=1 identity , it is easy to show, that the product of the Planck-Length and the Squareroot of Alpha becomes: √(Alpha).Planck-Length, defining the Planck-Length-Oscillation or PLO for the Planck-Oscillator:

PLO=√(Alpha).LPlanck=√(2πke²/hc).√(hG/2πc³)=e/c²    (4)

So now we have a length dimension expressed in the 'Stoney-Unit' of the Coulombic Charge quantum and as related to the Planck-Units.
The PLO now allows a string definition for the Coulombic Charge quantum as:

Stringed Coulombic Charge Quantum:

 e=PLO.c²     (5)

The stringed Coulombic Charge quantum so MANIFESTS as a INERTIAL charge quantum in a mass parametric universe. This can be ascertained in the nature of electromagnetic radiation or EMR.
EMR is generated by the acceleration of Coulombic charges; where these charges are however ALWAYS associated with inertia, that is INERTIAL MASS.

The stringed Coulombic charge quantum is NOT associated with Inertial Mass, but represents its parental GRAVITATIONAL MASS.
So it is here, that the Equivalence Principle of Albert Einstein originates between them as two energy EIGENSTATES. These two eigenstates can be said to connect the boson-string epoch for a massless cosmic inflation to the mass parametric and general relativistic inertial cosmology of the thermodynamic Planck Black Body universe.

So, the informed and inquisitive reader may ask a pertinent question.

If the string epoch couples to the electric fields in the Coulombic charge quantum and the physical universe defines the electric field in electromagnetism as an invariant coupling to a magnetic field; where then is the magnetic string coupling in regards to the string epoch?

The answer is straight forward. The magnetic string coupling is the PREMASS as the Gravitational Mass and precursive to the Inertial Mass in the Equivalence Principle of General Relativity.
This of course solves many conundrums in modern cosmology all at once. The absence of magnetic monopoles in isolation becomes the effect of inertial mass being coupled electrically and gravitational mass being coupled magnetically.

Then, as inertia of mass is fundamentally magnetic string energy and no antimass is required for the thermodynamic mass evolution; no magnetic monopoles are necessary to implement the dynamics for the latter.

But now the question arises, as how to define inertial mass magnetically through and by those 'absent' magnetic monopoles.

We require an ACCELERATION of MagnetoCharges to generate the 'parental EMR' and an EMR which we may term String-EMR or EMMR for ElectroMagneticMonopolic Radiation.
The way for EMR to become generated, is by angular acceleration of say inertial protons in nuclear fusion reactions, such as occurs in stars, say the sun.
The way EMMR is generated, is by angular acceleration of stringed bosonic protons in something related to stars in say massless protostars of a premassive or preinertial or stringed scenario of Planckian energy, related to the energy of Black Holes.

This of course has been detailed many times in QR in the Ylemic NeutronStars, which mapped the primordial Beta-minus decay as the first implementation of the weak nuclear interaction in the first 1036 seconds or so of the cosmogenesis of the thermodynamic universe.
The ylemic protostars are defined in the modern scientific literature in terms of the Jeans Radius of gravitationally collapsing hydrogen clouds. The Jeans radius is much more fundamental in defining the ylemic protostars purely in terms of subatomic parameters; a stringed neutron mass (mc) and the CER.
The formulation describes the equilibrium between the gravitational inward pressure of contraction based on the nucleonic stringmass and the thermal outward pressure of expansion due to the thermodynamic temperature of the universe itself, albeit as modulated by the kinetic energy of Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE, which reprents the ZPE of the Planck-Oscillator under self-transformation of the stringed energies.
The expression for the ylemic radius is:

Rylem = √(kT.Re³/Gmc²)      (6)

The ylemic neutron stars are the parental neutron stars and describe the transition between neutron stars and Black Holes in the reversed sense as it is observed in the astrophysics of today.
Today, a limiting mass, called the Chandrasekhar Mass (MCH) defines 'electron degeneracy' in normally gravitating matter, which 'collapses' the atomic orbitals of electrons and so results in the electron degeneracy in the astrophysics of white dwarves.
The ylemic stars reverse this process in the astrophysics of nuclear stringed 'plasma' matter expanding to allow the electrons to define the atomic structure of hydrogen and the higher elements in the appropriate nucleosynthesis of the chemical elements.

Details are found in the library on the topics of Quantum Relativity and are discussed elsewhere. The important consequence of the ylems for the present derivation for the magnetic origin for all inertial mass are the subatomic string parameters of the Re scale as the interaction scale for the strong- and weak nuclear interactions in the Standard Model of Particle Physics with a nucleon string mass mc, which becomes defined in QR as a direct function of the Planck-Mass and the Alpha-Finestructures:

mc²=hc.Alpha18/2πG=mPlanck².Alpha18   (7)

We so have a mapping for the Planck-Mass as a gravitational stringed mass onto a manifestation of the inertial and nonstringed mass equivalence.
A detailed analysis, shows then, that this nucleonic string mass represents a phase transition from a stringed mass originating in the inflationary string epoch. It is known in the modern literature as a Grand-Unification-Theoretical GUT-mass of the X-Boson. It can also be identified as a particular heterotic string class of a symmetry group HO(32) in M-braned string theory.

Now it is here, that we shall find the magnetic orgin for mass; as the parent of the X-String-Boson is the Magnetic Monopole String-Boson of GUT-Energy mm=2.7x1016 GeV.
It's definition is decisive in QR in the generalisation of the kG=1 identity of the modular duality.

Using k=1/4πεo and finestructuring the Maxwell Constant  μoo=1/c²=(120π/c)(1/120πc)  in incorporating the finestructure of free space impedance or resistance defines k=1/G=30c in string parametric terms.

Letting ke²=GM² for M²=k²e²=(30ec)² for the decisive monopolic source mass:

Mm=30[ec]=30mm     (8)

In other words all inertial mass mi has a monopolic and gravitational mass mg equivalent which is of monopolic magnetic origin and can be expressed as a magnetocharge current which incorporates the displacement element in the form (Monopolic Current ef)x(Displacement λ)=Inertial Mass.
We now extend our mass generalisation even further in defining the following identity as the Gravitational Alpha Finestructure:

2πGMo²/hc =2πGmc²/hc.{E.mPlanck²/me²}    (9)

and where E represents a googol (a number greater than 10100) as a spacetime quanta counter; i.e. the number of Weyl-String Volumes at a particular chronologiocal n-time in the cosmology.
This 'special' time then defines the Sarkar-Black Hole to have the Schwarzschild metric:
 
Mo=RSarkarc²/2G=√(E){mPlanck.mc/me}
           =√(E).{mPlanck²/me}.Alpha9
           =√(E).{mc²/me}/Alpha9                 (10)
 
Crystallising the basic fundamental nucleon/electron ratio mc/me, we so relate the BH-Cosmology of the massless gravitational universe to the inertially massive universe defined in the couplings between nucleons and electrons, ergo the Planck Black Body thermodynamic cosmology of the Standard Model.
But how do we define the monopolic mass equivalence in terms of the Coulombic charge quantum e?
We must derive a magneto charge quantum e*; which will be the modular dual for the Weyl-String Energy quantum: EWeyl=hfWeyl=mWeyl.c=kTWeyl  as a transformed Planck-String after the end of the inflationary epoch and as the fundamental metric basis for the cosmology.

We so use the electromagnetic finestructure: Alpha=2πke²/hc = Ee²/Eo²  to define a 'Charge-Seed' Eo to induct the Sarkarian Mass-Seedling Mo with its magneto charge equivalent Eo.
So the googol E becomes a higher dimensional 'Super-Alpha' as the ratio:

Alpha/Alpha*=(e²/Eo²)=Alpha/E and with 
√(E)=(Mo.me/mc²)Alpha9  from (10).

One can now predict the number of nucleons of the universe comprising the Sarkar metric in stating that (Mo/mc) nucleons will be the this number, say as the ylemic neutron VPE energy eigenstates.
As the charges must be doubled for a bifurcation into positive and negative inertia associated electric charges, say proton- and electron charges, in say the primordial ylemic neutron-mc weak interaction decay; the number of Coulombic charge quantums now must be:
 
2e((Mo/mc).{e/e*)=Eo     (11)
 
It is now easy to derive the elementary definition for the Weyl-Loop Energy Eigenstate:
 
EWeyl=hfWeyl=mWeyl.c2=kTWeyl =√2πGme²/4Alpha.e².hc}
=(me/mPlanck)(1/2e)/√Alpha=(me/2ke²)=1/2Re
={me/mc}{1/2e}√(Alpha17)=1/e*       (12)
 
This equation represents the unification equation for the entirety of physical science.
 
The Weyl-String eigenstate is the ZPE quantum inherent in spacetime itself. A Planckian Action Energy activates the ZPE or VPE eigenstate in transformation of the inherent magnetic monopolic string energy into a initial magneto charge current given in IWeyl=2efWeyl=2eEWeyl/h=2emWeyl.c²/h and where the Weylian mass quantum mWeyl=hfWeyl/c² becomes magneto current in modular duality of the Weyl-String in Planck-oscillation vibration to its winded string duality and as expressed in the heterotic superstring class HE(64)=HE(8x8).
In QR the vibratory eigenstate is denoted as 'primary state' 'ps' and the winded state is denoted as its 'secondary' duality 'ss'.
Then, as the Weyl-mass quantum is a transformed Planck-mass of mWeyl=mps=2.22x10-20 kg in QR; its winded string dual must become the absolute minimum frequency eigenstate for inertia as the 'inflation-defining' timeinstanton fss=3.33x10-31 seconds.
All inertial mass so has this value as its intrinsic eigenfrequency and avoiding so any physical singularity calculations in accordance with the physical genesis of the Weyl-Loop.
All inertial mass also becomes quantised in the modular dual winded string mass-quantum:

mss=Ess/c² =hfss/c²=2.469..x10-81 kg

This defines a low-frequency and winded magneto-electricity quantum in the form Iss=2efss as the quantisation for Coulombic flow of inertia associated electricity, in that a medium is required for the currents to flow.
 
We can now relate the Weyl-Eigenstate for the Planck-Oscillator to the Scale of the Electron in the CER using (12):
 
As Eps=(me/mPlanck)(1/2e)/√Alpha=1/2Rec²=1/e* , we are now we are able to finetune our Gravitational Electron in (2), (3) and (4) in a more precise definition:
 
EPlanck=½ hf=½ mec²=Gme²/Ro    (2)

Ro/2Re=Gme²/ke²=G²me²/e²       (3)

PLO = √(Alpha).LPlanck=√(2πke²/hc).√(hG/2πc³)=e/c²     (4)
 
Ro/2Re=Gme²/ke²=G²me²/e²=LPlanck².Alpha/Re²=(2e/e*)² for the 12-dimensional Energy Hamiltonian expression:
 
2Re.c²=e* <-> e=PLO.c²    (13)
 
This becomes the mapping transformation of the magnetocharge e* and AS A MAGNETIC CHARGE from the 'higher' dimension as the CER in the 'lower dimension' and AS A DISPLACEMENT.
Modular Duality now reverses the process in mapping the ELECTRIC CHARGE from the 'lower' dimension as a now SUBPLANCKIAN DISPLACEMENT in the Planck-Length-Oscillation.
This last sentence describes the profundity of Quantum Relativity in terms of a new scientific understanding and the reformation and renewal of the paradigmatic standard models in both, the cosmology of the classical relativities and the cosmology of the quantum.
I'll end for now and attempt to share this in a readable manner with the forum member and whoever finds value in the self consistent and encompassing logos of QR.
 
Tony B.


CALCULATION OF THE ELECTRONMASS

The magnetic energy stored in a magnetic field B of volume V for a (n-turn toroidal) current inductor i for velocity v and selfinduction L is:


Um=½Li²=½(μon²v)(B/μon)²=½B²V/μo and the Magnetic Energy Density per unit volume is then Um/V=½B²/μo.


Similarly, the Electric Energy density per unit volume is: Ue/V=½εo say via the Maxwell equations and Gauss' law.


By the Biot-Savart and Ampere Law: B=μoq.v./4πr² and εo=1/c²μo for the E=cB foundation for electrodynamic theory.


So for integrating a spherical surface charge distribution dV=4πr².dr from Re to ∞:
Um=∫{μoq²v²/8πr²}dr = μoq²v²/8πRe.


Similarly, Ue=∫dUe=q²v²/8πεoRe =kq²/2Re=½me as per definition of the classical electron radius and for the total electron energy mec² set equal to the electric potential energy.


We term me here the EFFECTIVE electronmass and so differ it from an actual 'bare' restmass mo.
We now define the electric electromagnetic mass as:


melectric=kq²/2Rec²=Ue/c²=½me

and consider the electric electron energy to be half the total energy (akin the virial theorem for PE=2KE, say in the Bohr atom's PE=(-)ke²/RBohr = e²/4πεoRBohr = (2)e²/8πεoRBohr =2KE).


mmagneticoe²[v/c]²/8πRe=melectric.(v/c)²=½me.(v/c)²

and which must be the KE by Einstein's c²dm=c²(mr-mo) and for the relativistic electronmass mr=mo/√(1-B)  for  B=(v/c)².


But we can see, that should one use the measured electron mass from the Re-definition as the electron's restmass, that is:
 

mmagnetic+melectric=me{½+½(v/c)²}<me,

because of the mass-velocity dependency factor B and the groupvelocities v<c.
Halving the electronmass so into its magnetic and electric components requires this electronmass to be photonic-bosonic as a lightspeed bosonic string of the Planck-String transformations.
This then represents the SUPERSYMMETRIC ELECTRON of the string/inflation epoch.

For the classical fermionic electron, we introduce the relativistic restmass mo=hf/c² and set Constant Amooe²/8πRfor  AB=1/√[1-B] -1.


This leads to the quadratic: A²B²+(2A-A²)B+(1-2A)=0


and the solutions:


B=([A-2]±√[A²+4A])/2A={(½-1/A)±√(¼+1/A)}.


This defines a distribution of B=(v/c)² velocity ratios in mo.AB=μoe²[v/c]²/8πRe.


mmagneticoe²[v/c]²/8πRe=mo.AB=½me.(v/c)²

then finestructures mmagnetic in the relation moA=½me  and allows correlation between the relativistic and kinetic restmass mo and the effective electron groundmass me as a stringmass, transformed into an electron moving at relativistic speed v say.


In particular me =2Amo and is moA for A=½ AS the NEW minimisation condition.
In string parameters and with me in *units, the following is found:


moA=30e²c/e*=½me=4.645263574x10-31 kg*.


This implies, that for A=1, mo=½me, where me=9.290527147x10-31 kg*=60(ec)(e/e*)=(6000e)² kg* precisely and if the prequantum algorithmic associations, based on the magnetic constant defining the Classical Electronic Radius, are used in the numeracy.


In SI-units (CODATA), the (*) units are calibrated as:

m=0.9983318783m*; s=0.9990230094s*; kg=0.99626135kg* and C=0.0997296076C* depending on precision measurements for h=6.2607596x10-34 Js and c=2.99792458x108 m/s and e=1.60217653(14)x10-19 C.


Also, the bare electron is measured as: mo=9.1093826(16)x10-31 kg=9.1435672x10-31 kg*; but as function of Re and e and εo with the effective electronic restmass then becoming mo'=9.255793118x10-31 kg for a mo/mo'=0.98418.. or a relativistic mass-increase of 1.58%.


So if we allow the 'bare' electron to become effective in a 'counter-oscillation' with respect to the Planck-Length-Oscillation; we have a reduced CER for a relativistic electron moving say, through an electric potential of 8.191 keV with a relativistic speed of 0.1772c and representing the stringed supersymmetric electron as a leptonic fermion.


This effect is also a direct consequence from the definition of the CER.

In QR it is precise as a quantisation of the Weyl-Radius and the definition of the radian in:

Re=1010.rps(2π/360)=2.777..x10-15 m*=2.773144x10-15 m.

The latter value deviates from the SI-value in 2.773144/2.817940=0.9841 and which represent the mo/mo' percentage from before.


The mensuration systems are calibrated by the magnetic constant being measured as an identity in both, the SI- and the (*) systems as μo=120π/c=4π/107=1/εoc² and as c=3x108 (m/s)* precisely by definition.


There is however an interval of uncertainty in regards to the charge quantum e, as say observed in the Alpha-Variation of Webb and co from quasar spectra in hydrogenic absorption lines.


The SI-value for e is modified from e'=1.602112608x10-19 C in oo*]=0.994599463/C² in the unit of the Henry for magnetic induction in [H]=[Js²/C²].
This breaks the perfect calibration applied with introduction of the [kg] unit in terms of inertia, previously dependent only on lightspeed c in the Maxwell constant.


C²=0.994599463C²* then recalibrates the Coulombic charge quantum e from e=1.606456344x10-19 C*=1.602112608x10-19 C=e' from the measured e=1.60217653(14)x10-19 C.


e/e'=1.00004, which squared, represents the alpha variation as so 8 parts in 100,000.

The alpha variance is so an effect of inertia and relates to the CER in the PLO, which manifests in the inertial properties of the electron.


As B≥0 for all velocities v, bounded as groupspeed (not de Broglie Phasespeed always >c) in c for which B=1; a natural limit is found for the B distribution at A=½ and A=∞.
The 'bare' electron's restmass mo so is binomially distributed for the B quadratic.


Its minimum value is half its effective mass me and as given in melectric=kq²/2Rec²=Ue/c²=½me for A=½ and its maximum for A=∞ is the unity v=c for B=1.


The X-root is always positive in an interval from 0 to 1 and the Y-root is always negative in the interval from -3 to 0.


For A=½: B=-3/2±3/2 for roots x=0 and y=-3;
for A=¾: B=-5/6±√(19/12) for roots x=0.425 and y=-2.092;
for A=1: B=-½± ½√(5) for roots x=X and y=Y;
for A=∞: B=½[-]±½[+] for roots x=1[-] and y=0[-];


Letting B=n, we obtain the Feynman-Summation and the Binomial Identity gives the limit of A=½ in:


A=1/2 - B²{3/8 - 5B²/16 + 35B4/128 -...} and as the nonrelativistic low velocity approximation of E=mc² as KE=½mo.


But the FRB or Functional-Riemann-Bound in Quantum Relativity (and basic to the pentagonal string/brane symmetries) is defined in the renormalisation of a wavefunction B(n)=(2e/hφ).exp(-alpha.T(n)), exactly about the roots X,Y, which are specified in the electron masses for A=1 in the above.


The unifying condition is the Euler Identity: XY=X+Y=i²=-1=℮.


This concludes this introduction to the electron's electromagnetic restmass.


Hi all!


Here is a completion of my work of sorts. It provides the groundwork for someone more adept than me in the ways of unifying various branches of theoretical physics.

The Equivalence Principle between inertial mass and gravitational mass is shown to derive from inertial mass being equivalent to a superconductive source current and as known in the data base as the impedance of free space.


Spacetime curvature in General Relativity is shown not to be truly elementary in terms of mass content or inertia; but to be inherent in the opening and closing of elementary supermembranes. It so must be derived from the inherent topology of spacetime and say related differential geometries.


What is truly fundamental, is the notion of supercharge as inverted energy. This is evidenced as the Colour-Charge or the gluon charge of the Standard Model in particle physics and unifies all of physics cosmologically in the quantum gravity manifesting as string transformations.


This supercharge is so not subject to experimental analysis as the well known Coulomb charge of electric fields.

It is more elementary, in describing the electric charges to have a higher dimensional progenitor in a magneto charge, which then hitherto manifests as the strong interaction in the nucleus in the quantum physics of the lower dimensions of the inertial parameters. In the higher dimensions, this colour-charge defines space and time in the invariance of the lightpath x=ct, where this 'linearised' time t is however coupled to a dimensionless cycle time n=Hot for dn/dt=Ho a nodal Hubble-Frequency; the latter being in modular duality or inversion properties relating the quantum geometry of the strings to the classical geometry of a curved spacetime containing mass.


The most basic physical principle so becomes rather simple.


The circular closing and opening of the smallest physical entities in the strings; is a simple holographic projection for this same opening and closing of a fractal universe defined in the metrics of Black Holes.


The elementary particles are stable in a fundamental fermionic quark-lepton hierarchy of a neutron  as a boundary transformation from a supersymmetry, namely the bosonic manifestation of this fermionically bifurcated eigenstate as a dineutron or Higgs-Bosonic neutron. This dineutron or Higgs-Eigenstate derived from a massless string transformation and then allowed fermionic plasma to be born in a primordial neutron beta decay.


All protons and electrons in the universe derived from this process.


There never existed any antimatter to equilibriate the mass content of those dineutrons however.  The parental string, known as the heterotic symmetry group 32, did not generate a matter-antimatter coupling in the X-Boson and the Anti-X-Boson; but it bifurcated into a leptonic ring-part and a quarkian kernel-part under the gravitational mass equivalent described in a flow of frequency as say a string current, which was by definition superconductive as no media for the manifestation of inertia yet existed.


The equivalence principle then 'seeded' the primordial universe with the bosonic dineutrons bifurcating into neutron couplings, which then beta decayed. This decay manifested the inertial properties of spacetime under the guidance of a 'seedling' mechanism related to the Black Hole metrics manifesting as hyperstrings and which mapped the ZPE=VPE as the vortices for potential string energies as a hybrid eigenstate between the fermions and the bosons in a supersymmetric coupling.


The original massless Higgs-Bosonic eigenstate became magnetocharge induced in a breaking of an even earlier supersymmetry; namely the supersymmetry between radiation and antiradiation in terms of chirally different gauge transformations and eigenstates.


This must prove definitive in any unifying cosmology. The noninertial cosmology of a massless universe can yet be gravitational in its inherent curvature of the quantum gravity of superstrings; whose energy will define the colour-charge as magnetic precursor for the electro charges measured in inertia physics.


The prior supersymmetry so will be spin- or chiral different; say in a definition for the EMMR (as magnetocharged EMR independent on the existence of mass) gauge as selfinteracting in two spin directions, say up and down or clockwise and anticlockwise.


This selfinteraction must be topologically multiconnected and allow a Moebian connectivity to selfenfold this differential geometry in a primal definition of multiconnected spacetime.


Because of this selfenfoldment then, the chiral orientations can manifest on a onesided surface or manifold and produce a dimensional divide, such as is used in this and related paper as 'higher' and 'lower'.


So the massless eigenstate can selfinteract and allow projection of two spin-different eigenstates, say the divided dimensionalities.


Here then, the colour charge manifests in a trisection for the enclosed area as a 'magneto-charge flux'; albeit in a 'colour mixing', which can be modelled on say 120 degree sectors of a circle. Introducing cyclicity in permutations, will now allow an additional sense of differentiation between the EMMR gauges.


In particular the Principle of Quantum Relativity will be introduced as the Self-Relativity of the multiconnected manifold flux for the colour charges.


Self-Relative to a Onesided manifold; a cyclic permutation RGB=GBR=BRG will provide a different colour-mixing, say (R+R)(G+G)(B+B) or (R+G=Y)(G+B=C)(B+R=M) or the cyclic permutation YCM=CMY=MYC; than a TwoSided manifold.

The doublesided surface will so define the 'dimensional' divide as the inside and the outside of say a 2-Sphere or 3-Ball embedded in 3-dimensional Riemann-Space R3.

This dimensional divide will then become geometrically equivalent to a 180 degree inversion of say the sinusoidal waveform.


So then the EMMR colour charge gauge defined in RGB now can redefine itself as say a Matter-Template YCM for a halfcycle of the aforesaid sinusoidal waveform, geometrically identical to 'half of the cipher 8 or the symbol for infinity (∞)). This blueprint for matter is bosonic and massless.


Completing the sinusoidal waveform so defines a 'Point of Inflexion' where the gauge flips from one cyclicity to its anticycle and RGB becomes BGR and YCM becomes MCY.


So the Anti-EMMR gauge for bosonic AntiRadiation becomes BGR with definition of an AntiMatter-Template MCY, (Neutrinos will be BBGGRR and AntiNeutrinos RRGGBB in a later definition say).


This process can be easily ascertained to now iteratively repeat as the scenario of closed superstrings nonlinearly propagating themselves as those sinuisoidal geometrical waveforms in a coupling and flipping of EMMR+AntiEMMR->AntiEMMR+EMMR->EMMR+AntiEMMR->......


In terms of colour-mixing  RGB+RGB in the onesidedness results in the colour charge transformations:   YCM->MCY->YCM->.....


To 'Break the Symmetry'; the continuity of the inflexion points at 180-degree intervals must be broken.


Equivalent to an infinite computer-loop based on binary qubit eigenstates; one complete traversion of sinx+sin(-x)=sinx-sinx=0 will suffice to manifest the bosonic matter-antimatter eigenstates in term of transmuted colour charges e*.


Those colour charges e* will in due course give rise to yet another eigenstate, namely the eigenstates embodied in the physical laws of Max Planck in E=hf and of Albert Einstein in E=mc2.


The bosonic eigenstate will then assume the Planck-Law and the fermionic eigenstate will associate with the Einstein-Law.


The bosonic primordial string eigenstate is massless but becomes subject to inertia in a transformation of the colour charges from one dimension in to the other.


In particular, there are 8 permutative eigenstates for the gauge trisection in quantum geometry. Defining a 'pure' radiative eigenstate as W(hite) and a 'pure' inertial eigenstate as B(lack); gives 6 hybrid eigenstates as energy transitories between E=hf and E=mc2.

For a matter (or antimatter) trisection this will be: WWW for the Planck-Law and transforming into the BBB for the Einstein-Law via hybrid states WWB and WBW and BWW and BBW and BWB and WBB.


For a matter-antimatter coupling, there will be four such eigen states in: WW and WB and BW and BB.

This scenario of course is manifested and observable in the decay of the higher energy 'particles' or 'wavelets' into their neutron-defined elementary eigenstates of string-bosonic origins.


But the Origin of Mass is yet in the making. The Radiation-AntiRadiation symmetry must be broken to allow the still MASSLESS Matter-AntiMatter 'Mirror-Symmetry' to become MASSINDUCED by the colour charge string transformation described in the above.


So after the completion of a single waveform; the AntiEMMR gauge DOES NOT INFLECT; but the EMMR gauge does.

So in Lucifer- or LasufeR-like fashion of RefusaL, the Supersymmetry between the gauges is broken in a Double-Up-Spin (say) now requiring renormalisation in the creation of the GRAVITON gauge.


Defining the EMMR  gauge as RGB with up-spin will now define a SUPPRESSED AntiEMMR gauge as BGR with up-spin and a Graviton gauge as BGR with doubledown-spin.


The BGR gauge becomes suppressed, because now the onesidedness must become doublesided to harbour the new gauge definition in ENERGY and in SPIN.

The e* energy of the EMMR gauge is now mapped onto the e* energy of the Graviton gauge, rendering the energy of the AntiEMMR gauge superfluous in a 'transfer' or superposition of that energy e*.


A new cosmological scenario now eventuates in a gauge unification across dimensions, which seeks a new form of equilibrium.


The previous 0-spin or scalar nature of the Higgs-Boson now bifurcates into fermionic quantum spin eigenstates in inducing EITHER the Matter-template or the AntiMatter-template. This is decisive, as the SPIN of the EMMR-Antigauge is still required in the cosmology to conserve the quantum spin.


The suppression of the AntiRadiation so for one creates the Graviton and for two allows the Higgs-Bosonic Mastertemplate to become a universal inertial massinducer in a coupling to the new Graviton master gauge BGR of doubledown spin.


But what is the effect of choosing either the matter template or the antimatter template?


This is just the SUPERSYMMETRY between the EMMR-gauge and the Graviton-gauge in energy in that now the twosidedness will give a different colour-mixing, which describes the quark-antiquark  or mesonic coupling in RGB+BGR=(R+B)(G+G)(B+R)=MGGM=CRRC=YBBY colour charge eigenstates from the permutative cyclicities. The latter eigenstate is known as the base pionic VPE and as a direct manifestation from the ZPE of the 'nonvirtual' Heisenbergian gauge background defined in e*.


This VPE-background so describes the metrics in an inertial spacetime continuum, yet string discretised or quantised quantum gravitationally in the monopolic string currents, which are identical to the gravitational mass of massless gauges under Planck's Law and the inertial mass of Einstein's Law.


And so it is, that no antimatter is required, EXCEPT as emergence from the VPE background as described. This VPE is supersymmetric in not differentiating between the eigenstates of RGB+BGR=MGGM=GGMM=GMMG=MMGG=...  in permutative cyclicity for three colours reducing to just two colours.


The Higgsian MassInduction now takes the form of renormalising the suppressed BGR colour-charge mix with the initially massless matter template YCM.


YCM is scalar as a Higgsian quantum geometric template and becomes gravitational in coupling to the BGR graviton gauge in tandem with the 'suppressed' BGR template to render the introduction of the GLUON gauge as mass-coupled quark inducer necessary.


Then 2(RGB+BGR)=2VPE neutralises the original massless gauges now in inertial associations.

ElectromagnetoGravitational Unification precedes the subsequent unifications however in the quantum spin equilibrium between the EMMR gauge, the Graviton gauge coupled to the AntiEMMR gauge in a Weak Association.

As the BGRs carry a down-spin remnant in 1-2=-1, the Gluon gauge will renormalise in a spin induction coupled to a Higgsian supersymmetric particle with a downspin to allow overall unification or superrenormalisation between all the gauges.

This is the RMP or RestMassPhoton with downspin and colour charge mixing YYCCMM.


Setting the EMMR gauge as identical to the Gluon gauge across the unified manifold in onesided SelfRelativity; will demand the RMP to provide the StrongWeak Coupling between the inertial and gravitational mass definitions and so the unification between the laws of Planck and Einstein as previously described.


So the Gluon is in supersymmetry to the RMP and the EMMR gauge is in supersymmetry to the Graviton, albeit in conjunction with a coupled AntiEMMR gauge which is suppressed.


As all five gauges are massless, BUT the RMP allows the hybrid states for energy in the supersymmetries to mass induce a common Higgsian scalar template via its defintion as a blueprint for matter in YCM; this Higgsian template must assume a general quantum geometric form, which allows all subsequent particle generations of the standard model to emerge from it as 'substructures'.


In most elementary terms, the RMP is a squared or doubled VPE-string state which enables the concept of mass to be described as transformed energy eigenstate from the demetricated string plenum of the cosmology. Hence the definition of the RMP must directly relate to the ob served manifestation of inertia, coupled to its precursor in the gravitational mass equivalence as stringed monopolic electricity and fundamentally defined in frequency.


Subsequently, assigning the StarCoulomb the units of V.df/dt will allow identification of spacetime itself and in the form of the ZPE=VPE acted upon as volume element by an angular acceleration df/dt, which in string terms can be described as 'awareness' about the Self-Eigenstates illustrated before.


This then leads to a physical description of consciousness in terms of the StarCoulomb (C*) and many details are embodied in the text following and can be found elsewhere on my site or the forum contributions.


The first mass induction is required to manifest the nature of the suppressed antiradiation gauge as that of so called weakons, which become defined in the coupling of a leptonic ring as subquark structure to a quarkian core or kernel, which is anti(neutrinoic). ElectroWeak Unification so must occur at the energy eigenstates of either charged- or neutral  weakon currents.  Neutral weakon currents (of Zo particles) are defined in precisely the 'squared' eigenstate of the RMP as substructure of the Higgs template and so in the superposition of antineutrinos in the case of matter.


To particularise the subHiggsian structure in the quark-antiquark or matter-antimatter couplings the quarks must be defined as diquarks or quark molecules associated with the trisection of the colour sectors. An intermediary and mesonic ring so will be necessary to define the down-quark oscillation wrt to the leptonic ring as the CER, coincident with the weakon scale, the strange quark level and the gluonic asymptotic confinement of those colour charges as the scale of the Higgs Boson itself.


This superposition of massless base neutrinos from the original massless Higgs Boson then defines a minimum of three neutrino generations; two massless ones (say electron and muon) and an inertial one (called tau) with a scalar mediating agent labeled Higgs neutrino, the latter being the mass induction of the kernel  as gluonic-neutrinoic unification of the quantum gravity via the quantum geometry of the intrinsic curvature of the strings.


Those strings are now greatly reduced from their original string energy defined in the gauges and e* and their Planckian transformation classes.


StrongWeak Unification so becomes the gluon-kernel-neutrino coupling, which electroweakly manifests in the inertia of the weakons.


The unification of the electromagnetic- and the gravitational interaction is inherent in the topological structure of the quantum geometry itself and is primarily independent on mass as the communication of the string gauges, initialised in the Gauged Radiation and AntiRadiation.

It becomes however a property of metric spacetime by the equivalence principle, which describes the gravitational mass equivalent as a monopolic string current.


Details are described in the treatize below and engage Maxwell's Law of Classical Electromagnetism and in particular his Displacement Current as an inherent form of spacetime itself.

This essay then justifies Maxwell's notion of an etheric medium of stress in identifying this 'stressable' etheric medium as the string background demetricated as the inherent curvature of spacetime in the nature of the ZPE as VPE and the elementary monad for the universe in the Weylian String Quantum, defining the omniscient magnetocharge as the 'Self- or EigenState' of the "God-Particle'.


Hi all!
This article generously shared by Hossein Javadi of cph group is dramatically affirming my post on the "Origins of Mass as a Monopole Mass Transformation". The mainstream is converging to the string cosmology as the discerning reader can ascertain in comparing my post of definitive initial conditions with the data contained in this article.
quote from below:
 
"In the universe before the bounce, all the general features will be the same, said Singh. It will follow the same dynamical equations, the Einstein's equations when the universe is large. Our model predicts that this happens when the universe becomes of the order 100 times larger than the Planck size. Further, the matter content will be the same, and it will have the same evolution. Since the pre-bounce universe is contracting, it will look as if we were looking at ours backward in time."

Before the Big Bang: A Twin Universe?

The new study suggests that the universe that came before our own universe was its identical twin.
Image credit: NASA and ESA.
 


 

Until very recently, asking what happened at or before the Big Bang was considered by physicists to be a religious question. General relativity theory just doesn't go there  at T=0, it spews out zeros, infinities, and errors  and so the question didn't make sense from a scientific view. 

But in the past few years, a new theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) has emerged. The theory suggests the possibility of a quantum bounce, where our universe stems from the collapse of a previous universe. Yet what that previous universe looked like was still beyond answering.

Now, physicists Alejandro Corichi from Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico and Parampreet Singh from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Ontario have developed a simplified LQG model that gives an intriguing answer: a pre-Big Bang universe might have looked a lot like ours. Their study will appear in an upcoming issue of Physical Review Letters.

The significance of this concept is that it answers what happened to the universe before the Big Bang, Singh told PhysOrg.com. It has remained a mystery, for models that could resolve the Big Bang singularity, whether it is a quantum foam or a classical space-time on the other side. For instance, if it were a quantum foam, we could not speak about a space-time, a notion of time, etc. Our study shows that the universe on the other side is very classical as ours.

The finding builds on previous research, with some important differences. Last year, Penn State physicist Martin Bojowald used a simplified version of LQG to show that a universe on the other side of the bounce could have existed. However, although that model produced valid math, no observations of our current universe could have lead to any understanding of the state of the pre-bounce universe, as nothing was preserved across the bounce. Bojowald described this as a sort of cosmic amnesia.

But Corichi and Singh have modified the simplified LQG theory further by approximating a key equation called the quantum constraint. Using their version, called sLQG, the researchers show that the relative fluctuations of volume and momentum in the pre-bounce universe are conserved across the bounce.

This means that the twin universe will have the same laws of physics and, in particular, the same notion of time as in ours, Singh said. The laws of physics will not change because the evolution is always unitary, which is the nicest way a quantum system can evolve. In our analogy, it will look identical to its twin when seen from afar; one could not distinguish them.

That means that our universe today, roughly 13.7 billion years after the bounce, would share many of the same properties of the pre-bounce universe at 13.7 billion years before the bounce. In a sense, our universe has a mirror image of itself, with the Big Bang (or bounce) as the line of symmetry.

In the universe before the bounce, all the general features will be the same, said Singh. It will follow the same dynamical equations, the Einstein's equations when the universe is large. Our model predicts that this happens when the universe becomes of the order 100 times larger than the Planck size. Further, the matter content will be the same, and it will have the same evolution. Since the pre-bounce universe is contracting, it will look as if we were looking at ours backward in time.

Specifically, Corichi and Singh calculate that the change in relative fluctuations across the bounce is less than 10-56, a number which becomes even smaller for universes that grow larger than 1 megaparsec (our universe is somewhere between 3,000 and 6,000 megaparsecs).

As the researchers explain, having an identical twin universe would not necessarily mean that every single feature of both universes would be identical. For instance, it doesn't imply that there was another you that existed at some point, a person who has already lived your life.

If one were able to look at certain microscopic properties with a very strong microscope,  a very high-energy experiment probing the Planck scale  one might see differences in some quantities, just as one might see that twins have different fingerprints or one has a mole and the other does not, or a different DNA, Singh said.

As Singh explained, there are still many questions regarding the details of the possible pre-bounce universe.

The biggest question is whether these features survive when we consider more complex situations, he said. For example, one would like to know whether some structures present in the previous universe  like galaxies  will leave some imprint in the new expanding one that will give rise to identical structure or just 'similar.' For instance, it could happen that, in the previous universe, galaxies formed in a different way, so one might have a different distribution of galaxies on the other side. We will be able to answer this question when we understand these models.

Ultimately, Corichi and Singh's model might even tell us what a future universe would look like. Depending on how fast our present universe is accelerating  which will ultimately determine its fate  there's a possibility that a generalization of the model would predict a re-collapse of our own universe.

Such a universe will have many bounces from one branch to another, Singh said. It is also possible that universes in different branches will be identical. 
 
Tony B.:
Mainstream physics is converging, but misses in the details. There was actually no bounce of a twin universe as such, but this bounce is the Oscillation of the Planck-Length from my works as the Squarerrot of Alpha, the finestructure constant which emerges the Stoney-Planck units of measurement in the unification of electric charge with the Planck units.
Its value is about 11.7.
 
The quote above describes the Modular Duality of string theory as the inversion duality of a small radius to a large radius (its inverse) in a coupling to the string modes of vibration or high energy and frequency (my ps-eigenstates of say the Weyl-Loop) and the string modes of winding as low energy and kow frequency (my ss-eigenstates).
 
The significant statement in the quote is the calculation, that this 'twin universe' does not happen at the Planck-Scale, but at a magnified Planck-Scale, so 100 times bigger.
 
This describes in QR the string transform of the Planck-String (class I open and closed) to the Monopole-String (class IIB, closed and selfdual as the missing monopoles in Maxwell's theories).
 
In QR this transformation is precise and gives the ratio between the Planck-Length and the Monopole-Length as:
 
LPlanck/LMonopole=√{Gh/2πc3}/{h/2π.mmonopole.c}=√{Gh/2πc3}.{2πec2/h}=2.85/1000 or a factor of 351.2 (or ~56 for the nonreduced Planck Constant h).
 
The overall 'bouncing' also engages a monopole mass increased by a factor of 30 in the unification of the finestructures of gravitation and electromagnetism.
 
The 'Twin-universe' of the article is thus identical to the Moebian connected 12th dimensional one in my posts, but is part of a single universe and as mapped in the history of the QR cosmology described in the posts.
 
Tony B.

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node46.html

Michael Faraday revolutionized physics in 1830 by showing that electricity and magnetism were interrelated phenomena. He achieved this breakthrough by careful experimentation. Between 1864 and 1873, James Clerk Maxwell achieved a similar breakthrough by pure thought. Of course, this was only possible because he was able to take the experimental results of Faraday, Ampère, etc., as his starting point. Prior to 1864, the laws of electromagnetism were written in integral form. Thus, Gauss's law was (in S.I. units) the flux of the electric field through a closed surface equals the total enclosed charge, divided by $\epsilon_0$. The no magnetic monopole law was the flux of the magnetic field through any closed surface is zero. Faraday's law was the electromotive force generated around a closed loop equals minus the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. Finally, Ampère's circuital law was the line integral of the magnetic field around a closed loop equals the total current flowing through the loop, multiplied by $\mu_0$. Maxwell's first great achievement was to realize that these laws could be expressed as a set of first-order partial differential equations. Of course, he wrote his equations out in component form, because modern vector notation did not come into vogue until about the time of the First World War. In modern notation, Maxwell first wrote:
$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf E}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0},$(400)
$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf B}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle 0,$(401)
$\displaystyle \nabla\times{\bf E}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle - \frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t} ,$(402)
$\displaystyle \nabla\times{\bf B}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle \mu_0  {\bf j}.$(403)



Maxwell's second great achievement was to realize that these equations are wrong.

We can see that there is something slightly unusual about Eqs. (400)-(403). They are very unfair to electric fields! After all, time-varying magnetic fields can induce electric fields, but electric fields apparently cannot affect magnetic fields in any way. However, there is a far more serious problem associated with the above equations, which we alluded to earlier on. Consider the integral form of the last Maxwell equation (i.e., Ampère's circuital law)
\begin{displaymath} \oint_C {\bf B} \cdot d{\bf l} = \mu_0 \int_S {\bf j} \cdot d{\bf S}. \end{displaymath}(404)


This says that the line integral of the magnetic field around a closed loop $C$ is equal to $\mu_0$ times the flux of the current density through the loop. The problem is that the flux of the current density through a loop is not, in general, a well-defined quantity. In order for the flux to be well-defined, the integral of ${\bf j}\cdot d{\bf S}$ over some surface $S$ attached to a loop $C$ must depend on $C$, but not on the details of $S$. This is only the case if
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\cdot{\bf j} = 0. \end{displaymath}(405)


Unfortunately, the above condition is only satisfied for non time-varying fields.

Why do we say that, in general, $\nabla\cdot{\bf j} \neq 0$? Well, consider the flux of ${\bf j}$ out of some closed surface $S$ enclosing a volume $V$. This is clearly equivalent to the rate at which charge flows out of $S$. However, if charge is a conserved quantity (and we certainly believe that it is) then the rate at which charge flows out of $S$ must equal the rate of decrease of the charge contained in volume $V$. Thus,
\begin{displaymath} \oint_S {\bf j} \cdot d{\bf S} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\! \int_V \rho dV. \end{displaymath}(406)


Making use of Gauss' theorem, this yields
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\cdot{\bf j} = -\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}. \end{displaymath}(407)


Thus, $\nabla\cdot{\bf j} = 0$ is only true in a steady-state (i.e., when $\partial/\partial t \equiv 0$).

The problem with Ampère's circuital law is well illustrated by the following very famous example. Consider a long straight wire interrupted by a parallel plate capacitor. Suppose that $C$ is some loop which circles the wire. In the non time-dependent situation, the capacitor acts like a break in the wire, so no current flows, and no magnetic field is generated. There is clearly no problem with Ampère's law in this case. However, in the time-dependent situation, a transient current flows in the wire as the capacitor charges up, or charges down, and so a transient magnetic field is generated. Thus, the line integral of the magnetic field around $C$ is (transiently) non-zero. According to Ampère's circuital law, the flux of the current through any surface attached to $C$ should also be (transiently) non-zero. Let us consider two such surfaces. The first surface, $S_1$, intersects the wire. This surface causes us no problem, since the flux of ${\bf j}$ though the surface is clearly non-zero (because it intersects a current carrying wire). The second surface, $S_2$, passes between the plates of the capacitor, and, therefore, does not intersect the wire at all. Clearly, the flux of the current through this surface is zero. The current fluxes through surfaces $S_1$ and $S_2$ are obviously different. However, both surfaces are attached to the same loop $C$, so the fluxes should be the same, according to Ampère's law (404). It would appear that Ampère's circuital law is about to disintegrate! However, we notice that although the surface $S_2$ does not intersect any electric current, it does pass through a region of strong changing electric field as it threads between the plates of the charging (or discharging) capacitor. Perhaps, if we add a term involving $\partial {\bf E}/{\partial t}$ to the right-hand side of Eq. (403) then we can somehow fix up Ampère's circuital law? This is, essentially, how Maxwell reasoned more than one hundred years ago.

Let us try out this scheme. Suppose that we write
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\times{\bf B} = \mu_0  {\bf j} +\lambda \frac{\partial {\bf E}}{\partial t} \end{displaymath}(408)


instead of Eq. (403). Here, $\lambda$ is some constant. Does this resolve our problem? We want the flux of the right-hand side of the above equation through some loop $C$ to be well-defined; i.e., it should only depend on $C$, and not the particular surface $S$ (which spans $C$) upon which it is evaluated. This is another way of saying that we want the divergence of the right-hand side to be zero. In fact, we can see that this is necessary for self-consistency, since the divergence of the left-hand side is automatically zero. So, taking the divergence of Eq. (408), we obtain
\begin{displaymath} 0= \mu_0  \nabla\cdot{\bf j} +\lambda  \frac{\partial  \nabla\cdot{\bf E}}{\partial t}. \end{displaymath}(409)


But, we know that
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\cdot{\bf E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}, \end{displaymath}(410)


so combining the previous two equations we arrive at
\begin{displaymath} \mu_0 \nabla\cdot{\bf j} + \frac{\lambda}{\epsilon_0} \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} =0. \end{displaymath}(411)


Now, our charge conservation law (407) can be written
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\cdot{\bf j} +\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} = 0. \end{displaymath}(412)


The previous two equations are in agreement provided $\lambda = \epsilon_0\mu_0$. So, if we modify the final Maxwell equation such that it reads
\begin{displaymath} \nabla\times{\bf B} = \mu_0  {\bf j} + \epsilon_0\mu_0  \frac{\partial {\bf E}}{\partial t}, \end{displaymath}(413)


then we find that the divergence of the right-hand side is zero as a consequence of charge conservation. The extra term is called the displacement current (this name was invented by Maxwell). In summary, we have shown that although the flux of the real current through a loop is not well-defined, if we form the sum of the real current and the displacement current then the flux of this new quantity through a loop is well-defined.

Of course, the displacement current is not a current at all. It is, in fact, associated with the generation of magnetic fields by time-varying electric fields. Maxwell came up with this rather curious name because many of his ideas regarding electric and magnetic fields were completely wrong. For instance, Maxwell believed in the æther, and he thought that electric and magnetic fields were some sort of stresses in this medium. He also thought that the displacement current was associated with displacements of the æther (hence, the name). The reason that these misconceptions did not invalidate his equations is quite simple. Maxwell based his equations on the results of experiments, and he added in his extra term so as to make these equations mathematically self-consistent. Both of these steps are valid irrespective of the existence or non-existence of the æther.

``But, hang on a minute,'' you might say, ``you can't go around adding terms to laws of physics just because you feel like it! The field equations (400)-(403) are derived directly from the results of famous nineteenth century experiments. If there is a new term involving the time derivative of the electric field which needs to be added into these equations, how come there is no corresponding nineteenth century experiment which demonstrates this? We have Faraday's law which shows that changing magnetic fields generate electric fields. Why is there no ``Joe Blogg's'' law that says that changing electric fields generate magnetic fields?'' This is a perfectly reasonable question. The answer is that the new term describes an effect which is far too small to have been observed in nineteenth century experiments. Let us demonstrate this.

First, we shall show that it is comparatively easy to detect the induction of an electric field by a changing magnetic field in a desktop laboratory experiment. The Earth's magnetic field is about 1 gauss (that is, $10^{-4}$ tesla). Magnetic fields generated by electromagnets (which will fit on a laboratory desktop) are typically about one hundred times bigger that this. Let us, therefore, consider a hypothetical experiment in which a 100 gauss magnetic field is switched on suddenly. Suppose that the field ramps up in one tenth of a second. What electromotive force is generated in a 10 centimeter square loop of wire located in this field? Faraday's law is written
\begin{displaymath} V = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \oint {\bf B}\cdot d{\bf S} \sim \frac{ B A}{t}, \end{displaymath}(414)


where B=0.01 tesla is the field-strength, A=0.01 m2 is the area of the loop, and t=0.1 seconds is the ramp time. It follows that V~1 millivolt. Well, one millivolt is easily detectable. In fact, most hand-held laboratory voltmeters are calibrated in millivolts. It is clear that we would have no difficulty whatsoever detecting the magnetic induction of electric fields in a nineteenth century style laboratory experiment.

Let us now consider the electric induction of magnetic fields. Suppose that our electric field is generated by a parallel plate capacitor of spacing one centimeter which is charged up to 100 volts. This gives a field of 104 volts per meter. Suppose, further, that the capacitor is discharged in one tenth of a second. The law of electric induction is obtained by integrating Eq. (413), and neglecting the first term on the right-hand side. Thus,
\begin{displaymath} \oint {\bf B} \cdot d{\bf l} = \epsilon_0 \mu_0  \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\! \int {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf S}. \end{displaymath}(415)


Let us consider a loop 10 centimeters square. What is the magnetic field generated around this loop (we could try to measure this with a Hall probe). Very approximately, we find that
\begin{displaymath} l  B \sim \epsilon_0 \mu_0  \frac{ E  l^2}{t}, \end{displaymath}(416)


where l=0.1 meters is the dimensions of the loop, B is the magnetic field-strength, E=104 volts per meter is the electric field, and t=0.1 seconds is the decay time of the field. We find that B~10-9 gauss. Modern technology is unable to detect such a small magnetic field, so we cannot really blame Faraday for not noticing electric induction in 1830.

``So,'' you might say, ``why did you bother mentioning this displacement current thing in the first place if it is undetectable?'' Again, a perfectly fair question. The answer is that the displacement current is detectable in some experiments. Suppose that we take an FM radio signal, amplify it so that its peak voltage is one hundred volts, and then apply it to the parallel plate capacitor in the previous hypothetical experiment. What size of magnetic field would this generate? Well, a typical FM signal oscillates at 109 Hz, so t in the previous example changes from 0.1 seconds to 10-9 seconds. Thus, the induced magnetic field is about 10-1 gauss. This is certainly detectable by modern technology. So, it would seem that if the electric field is oscillating fast then electric induction of magnetic fields is an observable effect. In fact, there is a virtually infallible rule for deciding whether or not the displacement current can be neglected in Eq. (413). If electromagnetic radiation is important then the displacement current must be included. On the other hand, if electromagnetic radiation is unimportant then the displacement current can be safely neglected. Clearly, Maxwell's inclusion of the displacement current in Eq. (413) was a vital step in his later realization that his equations allowed propagating wave-like solutions. These solutions are, of course, electromagnetic waves. But, more of this later.

We are now in a position to write out Maxwell's equations in all their glory! We get
$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf E}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0},$(417)
$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf B}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle 0,$(418)
$\displaystyle \nabla\times{\bf E}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle - \frac{\partial {\bf B}}{\partial t} ,$(419)
$\displaystyle \nabla\times{\bf B}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle \mu_0  {\bf j}+ \epsilon_0\mu_0 \frac{\partial {\bf E}}{\partial t}.$(420)



These four partial differential equations constitute a complete description of the behaviour of electric and magnetic fields. The first equation describes how electric fields are induced by charges. The second equation says that there is no such thing as a magnetic monopole. The third equation describes the induction of electric fields by changing magnetic fields, and the fourth equation describes the generation of magnetic fields by electric currents and the induction of magnetic fields by changing electric fields. Note that with the inclusion of the displacement current these equations treat electric and magnetic fields on an equal footing: i.e., electric fields can induce magnetic fields, and vice versa. Equations (417)-(420) sum up the experimental results of Coulomb, Ampère, and Faraday very succinctly: they are called Maxwell's equations because James Clerk Maxwell was the first to write them down (in component form). Maxwell also fixed them up so that they made mathematical sense.




next up previous
Next: Potential formulation Up: Time-dependent Maxwell's equations Previous: Gauge transformations

Richard Fitzpatrick 2006-02-02

 

The Origin of Mass as Monopole-Mass Transformation


"Maxwell came up with this rather curious name because many of his ideas regarding electric and magnetic fields were completely wrong. For instance, Maxwell believed in the æther, and he thought that electric and magnetic fields were some sort of stresses in this medium. He also thought that the displacement current was associated with displacements of the æther (hence, the name)."   
 

I
shall try to show that Maxwell's Ether is real in the sense of the stringed ZPE background.  This will embody a imo beautiful mapping of displacement scales as fundamental cosmology.

1. MagnetoCharge                e*= 2Re.c²

to define the atomic scale manifested via stringed monopolic magnetism;

2. ElectroCharge                   e= (Alpha).Planck-Length.c²

to define the Planck-Length manifested via electricity;

3. Magnetic Constant   μo= (Radian definition).Weyl-Perimeter.c²

to define the 9-micron scale  as a 'lifeforce' for biovitality in the universe.


We recall equation (13):
 

2Re.c²=e* <-> e=PLO.c² (13)
 
 
This becomes the mapping transformation of the magnetocharge e* and AS A MAGNETIC CHARGE from the 'higher' dimension as the CER in the 'lower dimension' and AS A DISPLACEMENT.
Modular Duality now reverses the process in mapping the ELECTRIC CHARGE from the 'lower' dimension as a now SUBPLANCKIAN DISPLACEMENT in the Planck-Length-Oscillation.
 
Now recall the Newtonian- and Coulombian ForceLaws describing the inverse square expression for the 'infinite' interactions between 'pointcharges e' and between 'pointmasses m' and separated by a distance r:
 
Fe=ke²/  and  Fm=Gm²/r²  and from which the Energy formulas describe electric- and gravitational potential energy in the forms:  Ve=ke²/r   and Vm=Gm²/r.
 
Substituting the action parameter  hc/  for  displacement r then crystallises the dimensionless finestrycture for the energy interactions of electromagnetism and gravitation.
 
This leads for example to a description of chemistry in form of the Rydberg spectra, derived from the Bohr atom and where for the Rydberg-Constant      R=Alpha³/4πRe  we find  hc.R=Alpha².me/2   as the Rydberg Energy with Ry finestructuring in the wave quantum numbers  k for the atomic spectra as: 
 
k=R(1/n²  -1/m² )Z² 

and with Z the atomic number for the elements.   Modular  Duality connects these two potential energy expressions in an inversion energy, we have termed Magneto-Charge as inversed Weyl-Energy however and we write the so called ZPE as a potential energy and as VPE=Vortex-Potential-Energy: 

1/ZPEWeyl=e*=[360Re/8π](√μo)²/λWeyl
 
for 
 μo =e*.[8π/360].λWeyl/Re=120π/c        (14)
 
                                                   
We have used the the 'lower dimensional' manifestation of the StarCoulomb C* as the unit for inverted Zero-Point-Energy or ZPE=VPE in [1/J].   This crystallises the CER as:

Re =1010.λWeyl/360 = [2π/360]1010.rWeyl =e*/2c² = λWeyl/2hc³  
for             EWeyl=1/e*=hc/λWeyl    and   h=1/e*fWeyl               (15)

The StarCoulomb so has 'higher dimensional' string units as Volume.Angular Acceleration or V.df/dt, but manifests as the 'inverted' ZPE. 

We now introduce a Generalised Action Law:

ACTION=CHARGE² ; which manifests in the lower dimensions in the form of supercoductivity, say in the Quantum Hall Effect (RH=VH/IH=h/ne²); Josephson Frequencies (f=2e.V/h) and the Conductance Quantum (G=2e²/h); all of which describe a unified Resistance in Ohms (Ω) via a: 

Free Space Impedance:

Zo = √(μoo) = (2h/e²).Alpha = 120π (Ω) 

for      Alpha=Zo /2RH        for n=2 in the quantised Hall effect.     (16)
 

Maxwell's equation for the displacement current:  
jD  = εo.∂/∂t∫E.dS   from      
$\displaystyle \nabla\times{\bf B}$$\textstyle =$$\displaystyle \mu_0  {\bf j}+ \epsilon_0\mu_0 \frac{\partial {\bf E}}{\partial t}.$ and
  \begin{displaymath} \oint {\bf B} \cdot d{\bf l} = \epsilon_0 \mu_0  \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\! \int {\bf E} \cdot d{\bf S}. \end{displaymath} 
   
now gives the dimensional analysis:  [jD]=[C²/Jm][1/s][V/m][m²]=[C/s]=[A] -> 2ef=I for current in the lower dimensional realm becoming the magnetocurrent:  [ec]=[efλ]=[imλm] in the higher dimensional scenario of its transpositional  mapping. 

We so define the mass equivalence for a mass m quantised in N to magnetocurrent as follows: 

    For any mass m:       m= N'.mss = N'(efssm  

The elementary monopolic current quantum is:    efss = ec²mss/h ~ 5.353x10-50 Ampere* for mss=hfss/c²=2.4691358..x10-81 kg* ; manifests however in the Cooper-Pairing Iss=2Nefss, that is the mass current is quantised in the zero-spin bosonification of the fermionic double-electron charge and for integer count N.
  
The stringmass quantum  mss=(efssm=e.hfss/(ec)c  is the Inertial Mass Quantum and where (efss) ~ 5.353x10-50 Ampere*   is the equivalent Gravitational Mass Quantum as a monopolic mass current, manifesting at the unification wavelength scale of the GUT-Monopole of energy 2.7x1016 GeV and as the monopolic perimeter of λm =mss /(efss)=h/ec² = 4.611023....x10-32 m* and as a magnified and transformed Planck-Length λPlanck =2πRPlanck.
 
λm /λPlanck={h/ec² }/{√(2πhG/c³)}
                 =
√(15h/π)/e=√(10-32/π)/e=(10-16/e)/√π      (17) 

These definitions take the transformation mapping of the mensuration units between the dimensions and so the generalised action law for unitised resistance and impedance into account. The squared Impedance is measured in Ω²=H(enry)/F(arad) and so in a sense defines an Impedance Action h*=ee* from
Zo = √(μoo).

As the PLO=√(Alpha).√(hG/2πc³)=e/c²,  {h/ec²}=h.PLO/e²  as a transformed displacement unit.
The modular duality between  the elctric potential  Ve=ke²/r   and the gravitational potential  Vm=Gm²/r so describes an inversion lightpath for gravitation in the identity: 

For Electromagnetism:    c = λemr .femr    in m/s.
For Gravitation:             c = 1/(λgr .fgr)    in s/m,   subject to the string duality: 

λps λss=fps.fss=1  and the maximum- and minimum boundary/initial conditions for the 'awareness' or angular acceleration differential df/dt being: 

  (df/dt)max = fps²   and   (df/dt)min = fss²=1/fps²          (18)


Magneto-Charge e*=2Re.c2=2(1=10λps/360)c2 =(1010/180){λps.c2}=(1010/180){λμ} for a Infrared-Unification-Wavelength: μ}IR=180e*/1010=180c.Lo=9 microns* and for
c=fIRIR=(6x1015/180 Hz*).(9x10-6 m*).

Light-Constant Lo=1/(6x1015) is a fundamental algorithmic constant of frequency transduction,
where Lo.fps=5x1014 Hz* defines the Optical-Unification-Frequency at 6000 Angstroms* and for Orange Light by λoptical=c/(Lo.fps)=6x10-7m*.



The CIRCULAR GRAVITO-MAGNETO-ELECTRIC SPECTRUM (GME-Spectrum):

femr.....λemr-------------------fgr.........λgr--femrλemr=c=1/(fgrλgr).................

fps......
λps--------MinMax------fss........λss--as ElectroMagnetic Wavelength λps

fpsLo...λoptical------------------
fss/Lo....1/λoptical----as Optical Unification λoptical

fIR......λμIRps
.c2-----------1/fIR........λss/c2------as InfraRed Unification λμ

c........1----------Unity---------1/c.........1------as EMR-GR-Wave Unification

2700...1/λIR--------------------1/2700....λIR-----as InfraRed Inversion Modality

180.....1/λoptical----------------1/180......λoptical---as Optical Inversion Modality

1/fIR....λss-------MaxMin-------fIR..........λps----as Gravitational Wavelength λss

fss.......cfps--------------------fps..........fss/c-----as Inflation-Wavelength cfps.



One effect of the GME-Spectrum becomes the proportion of a 'frozen GR-Wave' in any defined 'local universe' and as given by the lightspeed inversion. The acceleration am=cfps =3x1038 m/s2 so represents a modular dualised wavelength in the circular closure of the continnum of the GME-Spectrum.

As a 'winded superstring', Ess propagates as a local GR-Wave with Inversion-Lightspeed 1/c, which for a npresent cycletime npresent/Hoc ~ 2,010,264,772 m* for a distance so 5% the Venusian orbit, relative to the centre of the planet Earth.

This 'resistance field' grows at about 10.52 cm* annually.

  

Electroweak DeCoupling  

If we unitise our 'Awareness-Differential' under modular duality, we can now finetune our investigations in the proton/electron energy ratio by utility of a modified finestructure for gravitation.   We have used Unity as 1=2πGmPlanck²/hc to define the Planckian mass mP and have used the basic nucleon mass mc=mP.Alpha9, to relate this to the gravitational finestructure Alpha-G=Alpha18.  
We then substitute the effective electron mass me for one of the mc's in Alpha-G to define the finestructure coupling Alpha-E between the bosonic string bifurcation into the  quark-nucleon kernel and  leptonic ring parts which are themselves coupled in the neutrinoic core definitions in strongweak associativity.
The electromagnetic-gravitational coupling then is dimensionless as: 
 
Alpha/Alpha-E=ke²/Gmcme=[30ec]²/mcme         (19)  

in terms of the unification of electro charge with inertial mass as a monopolic magneto-charge current.   We recall, from the Big Bang thought experiment and the beginning of this post, that the electron as a bosonic string became mapped onto the de Broglie phase transition, which defined the Hubble Oscillation for the cosmology. 

For the defining cycletime nps=Hotpsps/Rmax;  the de Broglie matter wave had a phase acceleration:  adB=Rmaxfps²=λps fps²/nps.   So the ratio between the minimum emergent metric  λps and the 'inflated' maximum Rmax modulates the superluminal inflationary lightspeed to its invariance in the relativistically mass parametric universe.

The superposed acceleration am=cfps=9x1038 m/s2 is now applied in frequency-awareness modulation.
df/dt=1 under modular duality implies that the frequency changes for the vibratory string eigenmodes are equivalent to time changes in the winded string eigenmodes. 

Writing  λps λss=fps.fss=1, so is equivalent of defining a nondual expression for: 
1=df/dt=f²=C.{Alpha.mP/[ec]}.{cfps}/{Alpha/Alpha-E}.
 
Here, Alpha.mP/[ec] is the string transform and coupling between the Planck string and the monopole string described elsewhere and C is some constant for rendering the boundary condition for a unitised higher dimensional awareness equal to its lower dimensional manifestation in the coupling between electro-charge and magnetocharge in the say Josephson ratio for Energy/Current in the action law.
 
We can so write:
C={[ec]/mP}.{cfps}/{Alpha-E}=hec/2πfps.GmP
mcme ={efss.mP/me.mc}=0.982958472.

This can be written as a function of the electron mass as monopolic current equivalence as:  

C.me=efss/Alpha9=efss.mP/mc                     (20)  

Here we used the effective electron mass me as a function of the CER and which differs from a 'bare' electronmass me in so 1.58% in QR calculations.
This also relates to the alpha variation of so 8 parts per 100,000 as previously indicated; in that future research and analysis, might well be induced to consider the amplitude of the cosmic wavefunction: B(n)=(2e/hA).exp{-Alpha.T(n)} in considerable detail. 

QR derives the value for the chargequantum e=1.606456344x10-19 C* in solving the transcendental equation 1=Bo.exp{Alpha} for complex solution n={-½ ± i.½√3},  say by Newton-Raphson iteration with a first approximation for e1=½hA=1.618221145..x10-19 C* and for the fundamental algorithmic 'current' constant A²=14x1524

One might note here the approximation of e to Y=1/X=1.6180339..=½(√5+1) in a factor of 1.000116 or of so 1 part in 10,000.   One might also note that the Functional-Riemann-Bound for B(n) is the real abscissa n=-½  as the conjugate for the real root in the Riemann Hypothesis in regards to the Zeta function.   But the significance of the X to Alpha mapping in the underpinning pentagonal supersymmetry of the cosmology also emerges in our string transformation and the constant C. 

Setting C=1, would decrease the effective electronmass me to a first approximation meo=hec/2πfps.GmPmc and about 9.1322x10-31 kg* and differing now in a factor of 1.00124.. from the SI-measured 9.1435672x10-31 kg*.  We can consider this to be a lower bound for the 'bare' electronmass meo


Then allowing C to decrease in regards to the frequency modulations and considering the definition of inertial mass as magneto charge current and unified with gravitational mass; then brings us into the Higgs mass induction scenarios of the quantum cosmology.
 
Define a 'Weak-Mixing-Angle' Θw in:  (1/C)sinΘw=X, where X is our supersymmetry parameter mapping Alpha in the string transformations.

Now allow C to vary as a function of cycletime n=Hot to define the electroweak mixing in terms of the cosmological Hubble-Oscillation and mapped linearly as an asymptotic deceleration of the intrinsic spacetime curvature of the quantum geometry.
 
Then:   Θw(n)=arcsin(CX)                                  (21) 

Using the effective electron mass me we set the amplitude 1/C=1.01733697  for the time instanton nps and as the maximum for the Planck-String to Monopole transformation in ElectroMagnetoGravito unification. 
1/C=1 for Θw(n)=arcsin(X)=38.17270762... precisely for the StrongElectroWeak unification of the Monopole to XL-boson string transmutation. 
This is preceded by 1/C=0 defining the 'singularity' for   Θw(n)=90 (degrees)  for the overall unification from the abstraction before the de Broglie inflation occurred.

Generally, we can compute the following table, using (20):

C.me=efss/Alpha9=efss.mP/mc  :  

sinΘw=CX......................Θw(n).........n-cycletime........Unification........me..................
1/C=0, C=∞...................Undefined,.. nPlanck.............SEWG....→me=Undefined  
1/C=X, C=Y....................90°,........... nMonopole ........sEwG......→me=5.644..x10-31 kg*
1/C=1, C=1....................38.173°,......nXL...................SEW.G....→me=9.132x10-31 kg*     1/C=1/Bo=1.0073..........37.847°,...... nECosmic..........SEW.......→me=9.198.x10-31 kg*  
1/C=1.01733697.............37.409°, .....nWeyl=nps .......S.EW......→me=9.29052714 x10-31 kg*
1/C=1.01733697{√Yⁿ}... 37.409°,...... nEW=Ho.tEW....EW.........→me=9.29052714x10-31 kg*   
1/C=1.33596..................27.556°,  for npresent=Ho.tpresent=1.1324........→me=constant

At Higgs-Boson 'time' tEW~1/365 s* for a Fermi-Coupling-Constant of 298.453 GeV*=297.834 GeVSI; and which 'reduces' in 1.58% in unison with the effective electron mass to 293.73 GeV*=293.13 GeVSI approximately. 

Gomcme=constant={GoXⁿ}.{mc√Yⁿ}me√Yⁿ  
and per unit electron mass me√Yⁿ:

 1
/C={me/efss}.{mc/mP}= 1.017336976{√Yⁿ
}     (22)
           

We allow the electron mass to remain constant and allow a general mass evolution for the characteristic base nucleon mass mc to modify the constancy of Newton's gravitational constant G as function of cycletime n and as G(n)=GoXⁿ.
Go=1/k then remains constant as string parameter, say applicable for Black Hole physics and the string scales in general.
The Bohr Magneton for the electron:  μe=eh/4πme  in Am²=J/T relates to the monopolic mass currents via elementary definitions: 

Angular  Quantum Spin Momentum applied to the electron as a Planck-Oscillator is:  L= h/4π. 

Magnetic Field Strength:   H=B/μ    in A/m=C/ms    for a Magnetic Flux Density or Magnetic Induction:   B=μH  in T(esla)T=Wb/m²=Vs/m²=Js/Cm²=J/Am² as Energy/(Current.Area).
 
The torque produced by a quantum spinning electron has so units of energy/magnetic induction or [J/T]. The electron spins about its own magnetoaxis and represents the inertial current I=ef. 

Lf/B=(h/4π).(I/eB)=(h/4eπ).(I²λ²/E)=(eh/4π)(λ²f²/mc²)=eh/4πm and for the inertial mass m. 

But in the gravitational monopolic current mass equivalence this becomes under recall of
[ec]=imλm :

Lf/B=(h/4π).(I/eB)=(h/4π).[ec/λm](imλm²/eE)=(h/4π).([ec]²/e.mc²) =(h/4πc).(ec/m).
 
So the Bohr Magneton for the electron incorporates the  ratio of the electron mass to the monopole mass as:
 
(me/[ec])=h/4πcμe = 30hεo/μe   
                            (23)

The string units of V(olts)/c³  so calibrate the inertial and gravitational masses in the monopolic GUT-mass [ec]c² = c³ electron volts.
 
We now exemplify the electron mass from before: 
An effective electron mass:  me=9.290527147x10-31 kg*=60(ec)(e/e*)=(6000e)² kg*, so consists of Ne=3.7626..x1050 stringed mass quanta.
This reduces for the bare electron mass in the previously discussed variation in the CER.

Considering the topological universe as a Riemannian hypersphere (C) in the extended complex plane; the 3D-volumar can be described in the curvature factor (3π/2)VSphere=8.VTorus for a toroidal volume VTorus=2π².R³  for:
VSphere/VTorus 16/3π=1.697652726... ~ 8{0.99083..}/δFeigenbaum and where the Feigenbaum-Delta represents the 'Chaos-Constant' for an iterative 'doubling-process' as attractor in complexity theory and similar and related analysis. 
 
If we now associate the dimensional reduction of generalised 'volumes' say as the magnification  factors:  4π/3→4π→8π from R3-Space to R2-Space to R1-Space in the lower dimensions for a single connected spherical volume; then the curvature factor 3π/2 maps the multiconnected toroidal volume in the reduction factors:  12π²→6π²→2π² in correspondence. 

Our CER applicable for the effective electronmass so is extended in inverse proportion to the latter in:
 
Re=ke²/mec²= Alpha.h/2πmec²         (1)

In particular the doubling of the chaos constant infers an increase in the magnification of Re in 2(1-0.99083...)~1.834%, which serves as a first approximation for the 'magnification' of the CER wrt the 'bare' electronmass. 
This first approximation, subject to perturbation and the 'reduced electron mass', so increases the CER from its 'precise' string value of Re=2.777... fermi to Re=2.82872... fermi*, which calibrate to 2.824 fermi (SI) using m=0.9983318783m*. 


Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here