Introduction to Quantum Relativity and the Quantum Geometry
by William MacArthur
Well let's take the first part - Imagine a line segment, and call it a
1-sphere. Now, it has no surface, because
a surface is necessarily 2D.
Yet the surface has been defined by the length of the segment.. You'll
see why in a moment.
Introduce
a second dimension and spin the segment around its centre, and
it traces out a circle. Now call the circle a 2-sphere.
It has a
surface! Namely the perimeter, but it it has no volume, because a volume
is necessarily 3D. However, the
circle defines the volume even so,
because if we introduce a third dimension and spin the circle around a
diameter,
we get a ball!
Now the ball is a 3-sphere, right? It has a surface, and a volume, and
the volume defines - something
else, but it isn't there yet because the
something else is 4D. Now spin the ball around - um - well, you have to
stop
trying to visualise now because you actually spin the ball around
a planar section, but in such a way that it is orthogonal
to all 3
visible dimensions, and you get a 4-sphere, only now there's a fourth
dimension to this thing, which I think
is called a hypersphere (Tony?).
Now the fun thing is that you can actually start even lower than the
line segment,
at a point, and call it a 0-sphere, and a "rotation" here
has to take the form of a double translation along a line to
produce the
1-sphere, but we will call it an 0D rotation. Of course there is no
surface, no volume, nothing at all,
except position. Its "rotation"
produces a 1-sphere (line segment ) that has position and magnitude.
Spin the 1-sphere
around it 0D centre (the position) and you get the
2-sphere with position, magnitude and a surface. Now spin that around
its 1D axis and you get a 3-sphere with position, magnitude, a surface
and a volume. Now spin the 3-sphere around
a suitable orthogonal 2D
section and it makes a 4-sphere, which has position, magnitude, surface,
volume and......
duration? See how we produce ever higher hyperspheres
we get more and more basic properties?
And so it goes on.
As an aid to visualising, let's go the other way and
slice a 4-sphere with a 3D volume (don't try to visualise this or
you'll
go mad) and you get a 3-sphere. Slice a 3-sphere with a 2D plane
surface and you get a 2-sphere or plane circle.
Slice a 2-sphere with a
1D line and you get a 1-sphere, and lastly slice this with a point to
get the 0-sphere.
Tony
is using brane terminology, but basically this is the operation
he's talking about I think The rest is a bit more abstract
still and
rather mathematical. The speed of light is c and it is constant.
Furthermore, light as the one entity that
actually moves at this rate is
a wave with frequency and wavelength, but also mass-energy (it's all
kinetic - there
is no *rest* mass energy, so no inertia, and that's why
it can never accelerate, decelerate, or even exist unless it's
buzzing
along at c.)
So - we have a constant manifest in real terms as a wave with a
frequency (inverse time)
a wavelength (a space function), and a
mass-energy, and they are all inextricably entwined. The mass m is
E/c^2. The energy is E = hn, and the frequency
n is 1/t, where t is a
time parameter yet to be determined.. The constant
speed c is nl where
l is the wavelength, and you can use simple algebra to get the other
dependencies.
So, this is a self consistent
simultaneous set of equations in six
dimensions (but two are constant so you can set it up as 4D) that can be
represented
using matrix algebra. You can describe such a system as a
matrix, and all matrices have certain powerful mathematical
properties.
Things like discriminants, and very powerfully, an "eigenvalue" which is
unique to the matrix. If two
matrices have the same eigenvalue, then
they are merely variants of the same system.
OK, now, setting this system
up as a matrix, we can compute the
eigenvector and eigenvalue for the matrix, (don't ask me how - I'm a
conceptual
physicist who visualises stuff, not a mathematician, so I
leave the donkey work to the mathos) and it turns out to be
a function
of photon mass with the physical dimension of time.
That is, the eigenvalue which is a characteristic
constant of the system
is fixed, and we can give it a name. Tony calls it an instanton, which
can also be regarded
as a quantum of time for that system (obviously
though different photon energies will give different eigenvalues and so
the instanton is a variable when we consider all possible frequencies.)
Note though that the evolution of the system
is such that you can take
time as the initial parameter on which everything else is going to
depend. From it we have
a frequency, and from frequency we have
wavelength (i.e. space) and lastly we have energy (mass) from the Plank
energy
equation expressed relativistically, E = hn = mc^2.
Now - say we shrink our system to the smallest possible length and time
that makes any physical sense,
namely the Planck scale. You now have an
instanton that is absolutely the very foundation of quantisable
spacetime.
It is a true time quantum from which EVERYTHING else derives.
I think Jim would be very pleased with this outcome as
he sees
absolutely EVERYTHING as being built from Planck actions, a notion with
which I personally agree wholeheartedly.
And you should be pleased
because it strongly vindicates your concept of a primal clock underlying
all reality (incidentally,
in loop quantum gravity, these "instantons"
are ticked out by spin vectors that serve to generate space, so again
your
early intuitions seem to be vindicated).....
Even though Tony's terminology is a bit obscure - and I for one am not
into brane theory at all yet, so I have to do a double take with most of
his stuff - it's mathy and I'm no motho -
when I said it makes sense,
it's because I can *see* it clearly in my mind's eye. It certainly does
seem to be the
way things work..........
Postulates of Quantum Relativity:
1. Set of Postulates of
SR (verbatim): Principle of Relativity
2. Set of Postulates of GR (verbatim): Principle of Equivalence
3. Set of Postulates
of QR (A,B,C,...): Principle of Quantization
A: Modular Duality between vibratory and winded Energy Eigenstates or
EE's,
allows the description of high frequency/small radius EE's
as physically equivalent to low frequency/big radius EE's
The
EE's are themselves defined in the Planck-Scale of the various
mensuration parameters as given in postulates 1. and 2.
Description:
The Operator E=f/R+wR describes vibratory mode f and winding mode w as being
as being invariant under simultaneous exchange of f & w and R & 1/R.
f=3 and w=2 for R=10 -> E=3/10+2.10=20+3/10 is IDENTICAL to
f=2 and w=3 for R=1/10-> E=2.10+3/10=20+3/10
In Point-Particle Quantum Mechanics, displacement and momentum are related
by Heisenberg's Constant and Fourier Transform.
EigenState [x> of position on the circle radius R is defined in [x>=
Sf .exp[ixp]]p>
where p=f/R and [p> is a momentum eigenstate as the uniform vibration state of
the string with phase factor h/4
p<=Et for t~1/E~R.
x is periodic with period T=2
pR as position x on a circle radius R.
EigenState [X> of position on the circle radius 1/R is defined in [X>=
Sw.exp[iXP]]P>
where P=wR and [P> is a momentum eigenstate as the uniform winding state of
the string with phase factor h/4
p<=Et for t~1/E~1/R.
X is periodic with period T=2
p/R as position X on a circle radius 1/R.
Two wavepackets x and X then evolve in time in proportionality of their respective
radii to the time required to complete a revolution of the circles and as given in the
Heisenberg Relation.
This serves as a technical description for 'displacement' in modular duality.
B: Modular Duality is defined in the threshold of the GR postulates
as the 'quantumsmeared' singularity of the Planck-Scale
(1. & 2.)
E=f/R+wR/L
P^2, with LP=Sqrt(Gh/2pc^3)=Planck-Length
remains invariant
under exchange of f & w, as well as R & L
P^2/R.
C: The fundamental constants, which define the Planck-Scale are al-
gorithmically obtainable in considering
a demetricated senario, in
which space and time are undefined and subject to definition by a
Machian Observer doing
the defining.
The derivation of the Electromagnetic Electronmass below indicates this.
A detailed analysis is found in the Algorithmic Gravity Paper.
D: The engagement of the Machian Observer then results in the Planck
Scale and under postulates B and A reattains
the sets of the pos-
tulates as given in 1. and 2.
This is described in the 'Machian Momentum' for the Universe Paper.
E: The algorithm defining the fundamental constants is based on the
premise of a mathematical supersymmetry,
thus becoming realised
as physical reality, defined in postulate A.
The Cosmic Wavefunction is the following Differential Equation:
dB/dT +
aB(n) = 0; a being
the Electromagnetic Finestructure as the
probability of light-matter interaction (~1/137).
This has a solution: B(n) = B
o.exp[-a.T(n)];
B
o=2e/hA from QR boundary conditions defining:
T(n)=n(n+1) as the Feynman Path-Summation of particular histories
under the pentagonal supersymmetry given in the identity:
XY=X+Y=-1=i^
2=exp[ip] and lim
[n->X]{T(n)}=1
This allows the Normalisation of the [
Y]^2 wavefunction to sum
to unity in B(n)=(2e/hA).exp[-
a.n(n+1)] with Functional Riemann Bound
FRB=-1/2, centred on the interval [Y,...-1,...-X,...-1/2,...(X-1),...0,...X].
Interval [Y,-1] sets F-Space; interval [-1,0] sets M-Space with uncertainty
interval [-X,(X-1)] and interval [0,n) sets the C-Space, encompassing OmniSpace.
n<0 is imaginary as real reflection of real n>0 of the C-Space, metrically defined
at the coordinate n=0 mapping n=n
ps, which is the instanton tps=fss=1/fps.
Cycletime n is defined in GR as dimensionless TauTime in curvature radius
Rc=c.dt/d
t for the pathlength of x=ct and become dn/dt=Ho, n=Hot in QR,
with H
o the nodal HubbleConstant defined in c=HoRmax=lps.fps.
The Feynman Path so sums both negative and positive integers
as: -n......-3...-2...-1...0...1...2...3......n =T(n) in absolute value to double the
infinities as the entropy reversal of lightpath x=c.t=(-c)(-t) in the Moebius
Property of the 4 worlds as outlined in the Machian Momentum Paper.
Cantor Cardinality Aleph-Null is thus Unitised in Aleph-All, counting infinities
as if they were integers of the Feynman Path.
This allows the Feynman interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as alternative
to the formulations of Schroedinger (fermions 1/2spin) and Klein-Gordon (bosons)
as timeindependent and timedependent (free particle form inconsistent with SR
in Schroedinger in 1st order t & 2nd order x), formulations respectively.
The units of B(n) are 1/J, that is Inverse Energy, with A^
2 an algorithmic constant
defining Current-Squared and 2e/h the Josephson Constant in Amperes/Joules.
B(n) as the universal cosmic wavefunction describes the universe as a potentially
infinite collection of 'frozen' wormhole- eigenstates at n=0.
The timeinstanton 'unfreezes' one such eigenstate and activates the protoverse as
discussed in the Machian Momentum Paper.
This then allows the 'Mappings' of the C-Space 'real time n>0' from the F-Space of the
'imaginary time n<-1' under utility of the M-Space interval as 'mirror-space'.
QR unifies electromagnetic and gravitational finestructures in F-Space using the Planck-
Length-Oscillation L
PSqrt(a)=e/c^2 from the subtimespace.
This yields the decisive mapping for the B(n):
Coulomb Charge e = L
P.Sqrt(a).c^2
<-->2Re.c^2 = e* (StarCoulomb Charge)
But the StarCoulomb is Inverse Energy by definition of the vibratory part of the
modular dual heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)=E
psEss.
........................,...
Eps=hfps=hc/lps=(me/2e).Sqrt[2pGo/ahc]=me/{2emPSqrt(a)}=1/e*.
m
P is the Planck-Mass and Go is the initiatory
Gravitational Constant, defined in
the FineStructure-Relation, which defines the Planck-Length-Oscillation in the
unification of electromagnetic interactions with those of gravitational permittivity:
G
o=4peo=1/30c
with dimensionless c-ether constant [c]unified.
This defines the MacArthur-Gamma as: "LightMass-Constant" LMC=Mac
g=30[c]unified.
Thus Quantum Relativity is defined in the charge mappings between the OmniSpace
dimensions; F maps magnetocharges e* onto electrocharges e under agency of the
11D-Witten Mirror, which is a Onesided Surface moebian connecting 10D to 12D.
The all encompassing source energy quantum is the E
ps-Gauge Boson, which manifests
as the Gauge mediator for the four elemental interactions, suppressing the weak inter-
action in a primary triplicity however to allow the Higgs Restmass Induction mechanism
to proceed in the defining qualities of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).
The details are discussed in the aformentioned papers and the archives of the QR website
and its links.
The paper below introduces some of those details.
CALCULATION OF THE ELECTRONMASS
The Main Idea is that the Electronmass is made up of two parts.
One part is the 'naked electronrestmass' and the other an additional part (a magneto-charged part also called electromagnetic
mass).
Together this gives a dynamic effective electronmass, which derives naturally from the other integerbased fundamental constants.
There are three such constants given by an algorithmic program, which relate directly to Energy concepts.
1. Einstein-Constant as: (9,10,16)=> 9x10^
16=c^2.
2. Planck-Constant as: (15,10,32) => 1/(15x10^
32)=h.
3. Boltzmann Constant as: (15,16,18) => 1/(15x16^
18)=k.
They are all dimensionless in pre-quantum algorithm space (prePlanck-Phase).
In a transitionphase, relating to the 'Quantum Big Bang', a boundary between a 'quantum realm' and classical physics became
established in a quantum tunneling of a 'false vacuum'.
This is described in de Broglie phase-inflation.
This phase inflation defines a closed curvature topologically equivalent to an open curvature and specifies modular duality
between maximum/minimum conditions.
The dimensionless number constants became physically manifested and related to many other derived parameters relating to
energy in the order of Temperature, Radiation and Mass; that is in the order of Boltzmann, Planck and Einstein.
One such relationship finestructures Maxwell's: 1/c^
2=moeo.
Another relationship defines the electronic radius as a quantum macroboundary in terms of the magnetic constant
mo.
Another relationship sets the linearisation of a circular quantum continuum in direct relation to a prequantumscale, that
is the supermembrane epoch from Planck-Time to Wormholetime.
The wormholetime derives from finestructuring the Action-Constant.
This formulation involves the electronic radius as a number constant.
From that electronic radius, the electronmass is implied as:
m
eo.c^2=e^2/[4peo.(electronic radius Re)].
Equality of dynamic electromagnetic mass in magnetic selfinduction to the relativistic mass increase, then leads to a finestructure
for the effective electronmass (above) as a distribution and as set out below.
There are a number of parameters and fundamental constants which are given by the pentagonal supersymmetry between four
dimensionally nested worlds.
The lightconstant 'c' becomes dimensionless in: c^
2=9x10^16 for example, giving a 'cosmic standard' system where c=300,000 km*/sec* precisely.
Calibration to the SI-system differs often less than 1%.
The electronmass was not amongst the elementaries however, because all restmasses are set to 0 in the first world (here
termed Omnispace of dimensions 10-11-12-(13=1)).
So we must derive the electronmass from the other given elementals.
It proceeds something like this.
One first finestructures the Maxwell-Constant into electric and magnetic parts and then applies the OmnispaceLaw {ACTION=CHARGE^
2} to find dimensionless (superconductive) expressions for electric permittivity eo and magnetic permeability mo.
This ACTION LAW maximises/minimises the Lagrangian in Omnispace, especially the boundary condition of the Planck-Length-Oscillation,
which maps the ForceCharges between Omnispace and Linespace.
Linespace connects Omnispace in dimension 1=13, which then also becomes a mirrored Timedimension in 1-2-3-4 D. Hyperspace
is world #3 mapping 4-5-6-7 and Quantumspace maps this as 7-8-9-10 into Omnispace as world #4).
There are two equal expressions for the Planck-Length Oscillation; allowing mappings from the creation world into the first
manifestation.
Planck-Length-Oscillation: (e/c^
2)=Planck-Length.SqrtAlpha.
This allows mapping of MagnetoCharges (e*) from 13D as Coulombic charges (e) as 1D (say).
Since Magnetocharge is defined as Inverse SourceEnergy in the form:
e*=Classical Electronic Diameter.c^
2 in units (m^3/s^2) or as [Volume.Angular Acceleration] and also as:
E[
ps]=hf[ps]=h/f[ss]=1/e*,
we find modular duality in supersymmetric associations between magnetocharges and electrocharges.
In particular, the vibrating Supermembrane (in 11D) E[
ps=primary sourcesink] is
modular dual to the E[ss=secondary sinksource] and so relates the inversion properties
of Maximum Radius to Minimum Radius.
This is the backbone of M-Theory, which labels our supermembrane E
psEss as the heterosis between the HE-Superstring (8x8) in 10 dimensions with a Bosonic superstring
in 26 dimensions.
In particular, you now find the mapping:
(e=Planck-Length-Oscillation.c^
2) <=>(e*=Classical Electronic Diameter.c^2) for electropole e and magnetopole e*.
The overall symmetry, crucial for deriving the electronmass is found in the Cosmic Wavefunction:
B(n)=(2e/hA).exp(-Alpha.T(n)),
where A is an algorithmic constant relating to (Current^2); Alpha is the Electromagnetic Finestructure Constant related
to the Gravitational Finestructure Constant in direct scaleproportion as:
ALPHA(GR)=ALPHA(EMR)^18;
and T(n)=n(n+1) is the Feynmann Summation, the Path-Integral over all possible particular histories, summing all absolute
integers in a Cantor Cardinality of Aleph-Null becoming Aleph-All, the counting of infinities as integers differing in 1).
The crucial point here is, that this wavefunction defines an infinite number of 'frozen' spacetimes, which upon a process
of 'thawing' (we could call it a spiritual awakening) can ACTIVATE themselves in (coming alive); but redefining themselves
as eventuating 'Baby Universes'.
Renormalising those frozen wormholes/potential universes, then defines a Functional-Riemann-Bound in the Complex Plane
at imaginary cycletime n=H
ot (Ho a nodal Hubble
Constant at 58 Hubble Units).
The statistical mean is at [n=-1/2] for the squared wavefunction as a density distribution.
This [FRB=-1/2] then relates to many fields in pure number theory, such as the Riemann Hypothesis of the Zeta Function
and the Euler Harmonic.
B(n) is also a disguised form of Stirling's Formula as function of Alpha.
But we now have expressions for the magnetic constant, which relate to the propagation of the unified field in the form
of 12 selfintersecting monopolic current-'knots'/junctions, giving rise to all particle families,
bosonic and fermionic in the application of a colourtrinity, triplets of unification (Red-Green-Blue=White in Radiation)
and (Yellow-Cyan-Magenta=Black in Paint/Mass).
Complementary triplets/doublets/singlets then define the unitary symmetries, such as 8 gluonic intermediate mesonic states
in {RC=MG=BY} and the permutation octet (WWW,WWB,WBW,BWW,BBW,BWB,WBB,BBB).
In particular there are exactly 10^
10/180 l[ps] wavelengths in the Classical Electron-Diameter, the latter
which is found modular dual in the expression: c=
l[ps]f[ps]=1/l[ss].f[ss].
This links Gravitational Radiation to Electromagnetic Radiation as Lagrangian Boundary Condition.
Because of this quantisation of the wormholeradius r[
ps]=l[ps]/2p;
we can directly relate the unified fieldpropagation (which is 4l[ps] or 8p radians) to the magnetic constant
linking the linearisation of the worm-holeperimeter to the fourfoldedness of the angular multivalued expression.
Define the electronrestmass as equality between the relativistic massincrease and its dynamic magnetic selfinduction.
You have: c^
2.(m-me)=mo.e^2.v^2/(8pRe), where me is the electronmass; e the electropolecharge; v the electron velocity; mo the magnetic constant and Re the
Classical Electronic Radius.
Now set: Constant A=
mo.e^2/(8pRe.me) and let Constant B=(v/c).
This leads to the quadratic: B^
2=([A-2]/2A)+-[A^2+4A]^1/2/2A.
This defines a distribution of B^
2=(v/c)^2
relativistic velocity ratios in me.A=mo.e^2/8pRe.
Using our definitions, we find: m
e.A=30e^2.c/e*=4.645263574x10^-31 kg*.
This implies, that for A=1, m
e=me/2, where
me=9.290527155x10^-31 kg* from the prequantum
algorithmic associations, based on the magnetic constant defining the Classical Electronic Radius.
Here me is the EFFECTIVE ELECTRONMASS and includes a MAGNETOCHARGED PART; added to the 'Naked Electronmass m
eo'.
As B^
2>=0 for all velocities v, bounded as groupspeed (not de Broglie Phasespeed
always >c) in c for which B^2=1; a natural limit is found for the B^2 distribution at A=1/2 and A=Infinity.
For A=1/2: B^
2=-3/2(+-)3/2 for roots x=0 and y=-3;
for A=3/4: B^
2=-5/6(+-)(19/12)^1/2 for
roots x=0.425 and y=-2.092;
for A=1: B^
2=-1/2(+-) Sqrt(5)/2 for roots x=X and y=Y;
for A=Infinity: B^
2=(1/2)[-](+-)(1/2)[+] for roots x=1[-] and y=0[-];
Letting B^
2=n, we obtain the Feynman-Summation and the Binomial Identity gives
the limit of A=1/2 in:
A=1/2 - B^
2{3/8 - 5B^2/16 + 35B^4/126 -...}.
But the FRB is defined in the renormalisation of B(n) exactly about the roots X,Y and so the model of the 'heavenly boundary
conditions' is proved, (relative to the composer).
The unifying condition is: XY=X+Y=i^
2=-1=exp(ip).
One can now introduce the magnetocharge to derive the 'naked electronmass' by perturbation and the
REDUCED CHARGE.
Let m
e*=me-meo for me*=2me.e^2/3Re.e*=1.556642765x10^-32 kg* {EQ.*}
as a first approximation and introduce the unitvolume V in: m
e*=mo.e^2.V/(4pRe^2.c^2).
"Cubing the Sphere" in the ratio of an inscribed (or circumscribed) sphere of unitradius and bounded by a cube of side
2-units then sets the unitvolume in an octagonised coordinate system.
V so becomes 4
p/3 in the ratio 4p/(3.8)=p/6 and we have {EQ.*}.
Using perturbation techniques, one then approximates the 'naked electronmass' from its magnetocharged and effective progenitor.
A complication arises because of the higher dimensional independence of the Alpha-Finestructure Constant from electric
permittivity.
The creation world form for Alpha=60
p.e^2/h as a direct reflection of the ACTION LAW (h*=ee*).
This results in a measured Alpha-Dip for certain cosmological redshift intervals (10D-11D intersections of electromagnetic
parameters) and other factors discussed in the 'Gravitational Constant' File, found on this site.
There is a possibility that Euler's Constant explicitly defines the electropolecharge and hence Alpha, but this is a work
in the wings.
But any empirical measurements of the 'Naked Electronmass' engage the Charge/Mass ratio [e/m] and are thus subject to further
finetuning.
Tony Sirebard
The Machian Momentum for the Universe
We consider the universe to be a Quantum Universe; that is we sum all fermionic spin-states (N) as Intrinsic Angular Momenta
to become the Intrisic Spin Angular Momentum for the Universe as a quantised protoverse.
This total momentum we considered mirrored in a dimensional 11-DWittenMirror reflecting 12D-OmniSpace onto 10D-OmniSpace
in a complexified within-without topology of a doublesided surface becoming onesided.
The modular duality of superbrane theory will prove useful in application in that regard.
This rather naturally engages the Heisenbergian Uncertainty Principle in the form of the fermionic (or halfspin) intrinsic
angular momentm given in h/4p as the limit for measurement regarding dynamical systems.
We engage the absolute polarity cancellation, say as x=v.t=(-v)(-t) in this doubling process in engaging the 4world scenario
of George Ryazanov and described in our context in the following analysis.
1. Moments of Inertia and the nested curvatures of dimension mappings
The Moment of Inertia of a solid sphere mass M and radius R is (2/5).MR^2 and that of a spherical shell
of the same dimensions is (2/3).MR^2 as determined by integration across the geometries.
We consider the universe to be the Hypersphere of Riemann of 4D-Volume [2p^2Rmax^3], which is also a 3D-surface of toroidal derivative, i.e. a KleinBottle as Moebian extension in 2D.
This kind of topology incorporates naturally our doubling of a onsided surface via a dimensional twist of a doublesided
surface.
This we term the Francom-Moebius Adjacency about a Wolford-Centre or mathematical point singularity.
As precisely 8 spheres radius (a) fit into a sphere radius (2a) and volume (4p/3)(8a^3)=
(32p/3)(a^3); we define the curvature factor (3p/2)
to relate toroidal volume [(2p^2)a^3] to
spherical volume [(4p/3)a^3].
Considering now the topology of such a torus, defined in radii a and 2a; we can observe a positive spherical curvature
encompassing a negative hyperbolic curvature in a 3D perspective, the latter which we expand into 4D as the hypersphere of
Riemann.
The encompassment or enveloping of a lower surface dimension by a volume dimension is however twosided.
We must consider the mapping of volumes onto both the inner and outer surfaces in the same dimensional sense.
Whilst the inner volume of the earth, say is mapped onto the inner manifold comprising the earth's surface; the outer volume
of the earth (the outer space) is mapped onto the outer manifold as the encompassing volume and as given in the 4D hypersphere,
which is a 3D surface.
This consideration then allows us to extend the 3D/4D scenario in the application of conifolded or enfolded higher dimensional
geometries.
Especially, there exist toroidal derivatives in 6D, which are called Calabi-Yau manifolds and their extensions into 7D
are termed Joycian shaped topologies.
We so invoke here the nomenclature of superbrane theory, without its mathematical formalism.
In our analysis of the Machian observer, we shall find the principle behind higher dimensional M-Theory of the superbranes.
The underlying principle is the Principle of Quantum Relativity (QR) as a natural extension for the Principle of General
Relativity (GR), itself a natural consequence for the Principle of Special Relativity (SR).
We rename M-Theory in 11 dimensions as FMC-Theory of Quantum Relativity in 12 dimensions for this purpose.
The elementary precept of modular duality in M-Theory shall also be the defining foundation for QR.
We then consider 3D-surfaces as 4D-volumes to conifold 6D-Calabi-Yau shapes and 7D-Joyce manifolds in the connector dimensions
of their enfolding.
This process renders the Minkowski-Riemann spacetime metric as a scalerelative enfolding of space within time, thus leading
to the 'sharing of dimensions' and any object moving through time with maximum speed 'c', requiring to be necessarily at rest
relative to its scale relative spacial dimensions.
Any motion of the object relative to the space dimensions, would decompose the Minkowski 4-vector and reduce the speed
c via the formalisms of Special Relativity and its postulates.
For simplicity, we define the 12 dimensions as a simple superpositioning of four worlds superimposed upon one another,
say as:
LineSpace (1-2-3)HyperSpace(4-5-6)QuantumSpace(7-8-9)OmniSpace(10-11-12)(13=1-2-3)..
Each of the four worlds is the Riemann hypersphere with 3 spacial dimensions and a connector time dimension, which forms
however a spacial dimension for the adjacent superimposed world.
So LineSpace connects to HyperSpace via a convenient, but ultimately imaginary timedimension and as say expressed in the
Minkowsi 4-vector.
We could also extend our 4 worlds in ascribing Translation to LineSpace, Rotation to Hyperspace, Vibration to QuantumSpace
and Quantization to OmniSpace, the decisive constant being the speed of light in 'free space', denoted as 'c'.
2. The Machian observer and the principles of relativity and the Weyl nullification
The rotational frames of references of HyperSpace will become elucidated in the Machian observer.
Consider the rotation of a dynamical system about its axis of rotation, say a solid circular disk radius R with angular
velocity w=v/R=2pf; f the frequency of rotation and v the tangential velocity
linked to angular centripetal acceleration ac =v^2/R.
The postulates of SR lead to Time-Dilation and Lorentz-Contraction and invoke the notion of no absolute motion being measurable
between two oberservers moving uniformely or at rest with respect to one another.
This and the invariance of 'c', irrespective as to the dynamical motion of the observer, forms the Principle of Special
Relativity.
The Principle of General Relativity states, that a dynamical system of SR, that is in uniform motion of an inertial frame
of reference and which is experiencing a gravitational field; is indistinguishable from a non-inertial system subject to accelerations,
which is not experiencing such a gravitational field. This is known as the Principle of Equivalence.
Our rotating disk above so experiences both inertial and non-inertial frames of references, so applying both SR and GR
in the one dynamical system.
In particular the radius vector must remain invariant, being normal to the central force, causing the centripetal acceleration.
The tangent vector experiences Lorentz-Contraction relative to a Bird's Eye Observer (BEO), which remains stationary relative
to the rotating frame of reference (FOR).
Using SR and allowing an observer to rotate with the FOR must produce the invariance of 'c'.
Now any 'observation point' for the corotating FOR must be somewhere on the disk, resolved in the radius vector and the
tangent vector.
We 'shrink' the radius vector using GR until we encounter the Weyl-Limit.
The Riemann Tensor of GR's field equations consists of two parts; the Weyl-Tidal-Tensor and the Ricci-Density-Tensor with
the g-metric.
The Weyl-Tensor preserves volume, but deforms the volume, whilst the Ricci-Tensor reduces volume in accelerating the particles
comprising the warping surface inwards.
But our radius vector must remain invariant and when the limit for measurement is reached in the 'point-limit', then there
can be no deformation by the Weyl-Tensor, because this would violate the invariance of the radius vector.
Subsequently, the Weyl-Curvature must be 0 and the 'point limit' must be a dewarped singularity, which we now rename as
the wormhole perimeter lps=rps/2p as
the metrically defined geodesic.
As mensuration limit, no further Lorentz-Contraction below the wormhole perimeter is possible.
This is a consequence of QR in the modular duality definitions for heterotic superstring HE(8x8), which we rename here
as the Supermembrane EpsEss.
3. Quantum Relativity definitions for the Mach observer
The Identity coupling the macrorealm to the microrealm is given in the inverse properties of SourceBoson Eps and SinkBoson
Ess, the subscripts denoting ps=primary sourcesink and ss=secondary sinksource.
QR defines the following:......Energy:..........E = moc^2 = hf
.........................................................................................E=hf
iff mo=0
.........................................................................................E=mo iff f=fss=1/fps=lps/c
All elementary particles/wavelets thus carry an intrinsic EigenFrequency or Lightequivalent fss=1/fps=tps, which is the TimeInstanton, the beginning of the universe as described by GR and
the metricated scenarios of mensuration, observation and scalerelative measurements.
This gives the inverse proportionality for lightspeed 'c' to the coupling between the vibratory Eps of
high frequency/small radius source-part, modular dual to the winded Ess of low frequency/big radius sink-part.
Gravitational Radiation is the modular inverse of Electromagnetic Radiation, differing in the scale-independent and algorithmically
QR-derived supersonstant c^2.
A derived minimum/maximum coupling relates the frequency of the 11D-oscillating universe with nodally fixed Hubble Constant
Ho=58.04 (km/Mpc.s) and maximum curvature radius Rmax=c/Ho to the wormhole in the constancy for c in: c = Ho.Rmax = fps.lps
Also, the dimensionless TauTime(t) in GR, applied to the curvature Rc=c.dt/dt,
becomes the cycletime n in our descriptions as dn/dt=Ho, n=Ho.t.
The wormhole perimeter is directly quantised in terms of the classical electron radius Re=e^2/(4peo.mec^2), which is proportional to the Compton
Radius of quantum-atomic-structure in RCompton=Re/Alpha.
Alpha is the electromagnetic finestructure given as Alpha=e^2/2eohc
and as Alpha=60pe^2/h in QR, and denotes the interaction probability between
matter and light.
(QR derives a superconductive form for the Action Law: Action = Charge^2, electrical conductance quantum,
Quantum Hall effect and Josephson Constant).
There are exactly 10^10 lps/360 wormholeperimeters
in one Re; relating to the finestructure of Planck's Constant h as: h=lps/[8p.Rec^3] in dimensionless
Action-Units (relating to the monopole superstring class IIB).
{The 360 count is not arbitrary, because the QR derivation for transcendental p, engages trigonometric series which lead to the cipher 180 as a limit in Archimedean polygon approximations, also related
to QR definitions for magnetic permeability and electric permittivity}.
The nodal and 11D oscillating universe grows under agency of 'c' in electromagnetic parameters, encompassing the asymptotically
expanding, but decelerating 10D hyperbolically curved 4D-volumed hypersphere as its inner surface mapping in say the 5D-Anti
DeSitter hyperspace.
The volume as 4D-information becomes the 3D-surface of the inner LineSpace mapping the 5D-surface of the outer HyperSpace.
The volume is nested between the surfaces of two worlds, an ekpyrotic universe of LineSpace blending with the Hyperspace,
encompassed in the cyclicity of the 10th dimension , reflecting off the M-Space of the Witten-Mirror.
Thus the connector-time dimensions are 4-7-10-13=1 and the four worlds are defined in perfect supersymmetry.
Maxwell's equations are introduced to the magnetic monopole(as selfdual superstring class IIB) and 12 magnetopolic junction
points within a fourfolded propagation of the wormhole toroidal spacequantum define the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity
(UFoQR).
And yet, this fourfoldedness is just the one world of our Machian Observer.
The singularity is no more; it has become the selfrelative BEO at the centre of rotation as the Machian Observer.
It is irrelevant if the BEO rotates with the Perimeter FOR or is stationary relative to it.
As Machian BEO, shehe is located literally at the centre of the universe, with everything else rotating or moving relatively
to himher.
The uniform motion of SR implies invariance of c, should the perimeter FOR rotate with the FOR.
It is only at the now demetricated singularity, that this corotation becomes arbitrary.
Demetricating the field equations of GR blends QuantumTheory with Classical Mechanics, culminating in General Relativity,
itself emerged from Special Relativity and the physics of Newton and Galileo.
The nullification of the Weyl-Tensor hence dewarps Minkowskian spacetime into the Schwarzschild solutions for the overall
cosmic evolution, from the wormhole singularity as limit for the g-metric onto the Sarkar-architecture of the fractal universe
in 236.5 million lightyears, then onwards towards the asymptotic boundary defined by the Spherical Standing Wave defined by
the Hubble-Oscillation and c-invariance.
Meanwhile so the oscillating cosmos has returned in its cyclicity to intersect the dimensions 2.2 Billion years ago, superposing
its blueshift onto the cosmological redshift and giving the 'appearance' of an accelerating cosmic expansion, linked to a
'dip' in the Alpha-Electromagnetic Finestructure Constant to about 80 parts per million in a redshift interval from 1.08 to
1.84, mapped again around an Arpian present cycle value of 0.2505.
But the finite cosmos is enfolded within the infinite one, creating space and time as it moves ever onwards under invariance
of 'c'.
4. The Mach momentum for the universe
Let us now calculate the Machian Momentum for the Universe and the intrinsic angular momentum for it as a Quantum Universe,
a Protouniverse or monosong.
The geometry can be modelled on a prolate ellipsoid with major axis invariance under rotation.
The focalpoints would remain mathematical singularities as the 0-brane of Quantum Relativity.
Any minor axis rotation would merge the focus points in a pointcircle and the 1-brane of QR would define an oblate ellipsoid
of phaseshifted multiverses; integrated as angular function of the complex OmniSpace as the Omniverse.
As there is no gravitational field outside the enfolded protouniverse, uniform motion of the protoverse in inertial frames
is not equivalent to accelerated motion in noninertial frames by the postulates of GR.
Subsequently, rotating the protouniverse in the nongravitational undefined spacetime without does not cause centripetal
forces balanced by centrifugal (coriolis) forces within the enfolded and metrically defined spacetimes.
The Machian and Einsteinian postulates of 'Relativity of Inertia' hence becomes the BEO -frame within the protoverse as
referring to the centre of rotation as the Machian observer, a reference previously known as 'relative to the fixed stars'.
It is only in that FOR, that the BEO becomes independent from any other coexisting relative rotational systems in the measurement
of the invariance of light, say as in the Sagnac Effect.
The monosongs become tunes, melodies and a symphony of the supermembranes as particle/wavelets of the UFoQR.
The Total Momentum for the Universe is given in:..................(2/3)M.Rmax^2.w = N.h/4p
We consider the Universe's mass M to be the surface mapping of 10D onto the inside of the 11D-manifold and use the moment
of inertia of a spherical shell. (This is the 2-brane/2-sphere of LineSpace).
We incorporate all fermionic particles, including the (anti)neutrinos, whose number is given in the baryon/photon ratio
(Eta h) and a number which increases N by a factor of about 10^9.
QR calculates, for a present cycletime np=1.1324.., the following parameters:
Deceleration Parameter qo=0.014015 for Sarkar-Architecture at cosmological redshift z=7.477 or 236.5
Mly.
Critical Density rc=3Ho^2/8pG=Rmax.c^2/2GVmax ....(rc=Ho^2/4p^2.G for 11D-curvature)
Mo=1.81371262x10^51 kg*
M8=6.47061227x10^52 kg*
Rmax=1.59767545x10^26 m*; R10D(n)=Rmax(1
- n/(n+1)) m*; R11D(n)=n.Rmax m*
No=1.8275x10^78
N8=6.5197x10^79
h
10D=3.64x10^-10
h11D=4.82x10^-11
w
= 2pf = 2p /T = 3Nh/{8phMRmax^2} = 3.06x10^-50 1/s for the asymptotic 10D-massparametric
universe
(T=Period)................................................................= 5.08x10^-50 1/s for the oscillating 11D-electromagnetic universe
The QR definition for time sets the natural limit for this in the minimum/maximum ratio of lps/Rmax=nps.
The Timeinstanton tps=fss=3.333..x10^-31 s thus relates nps=1/lssRmax=6.26x10^-49; mapping
the 'real' time tps onto the 'imaginary' time Ho.tps=1.17x10^-66 s/s.
This analysis has lead us into the realms of the poets and dreamers.
Leonardo de Vinci's 'Vitruvian Man' has literally become the Machian Observer, encompassing the entire universe as 'Cosmic
Man', the Adam Kadmon of Lurianic-Hebrew Kabbalah or the Purusha of Hindu cosmology.
Molecules are mapped as star systems from the 'inner space' and biovital cells become the galaxies of 'outer space'.
Every sentient being is mapped holographically as a neuron in all other 'immortalised' non-telomere depleted 'neuronal
brains'.
The monosongs become tunes, melodies and a symphony of the supermembranes as particle/wavelets of the UFoQR.
Anthony Paul Bermanseder, BSc.
From: "Tony Bermanseder/Sirebard" <pacificap@hotmail.com>
RESOLUTION OF NEWTON'S GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT MEASUREMENTS
The speed of light 'c' has been measured to an accuracy of 8
decimal places and Planck's Constant 'h' is known with an error not
exceeding one part per million.
This is not so for Newton's Gravitational Constant 'Big G'.
The National Bureau of Standards (NBS) in Gaithersburg, Maryland, US
began measuring 'G' in the 1930's to establish the Luther-Towler-
Number LTN=6.67259x10^
-11 G-units (m^3/kg.s^2].
So it stood until 1994, when the renowned PTB in Braunschweig,
Germany's Standards Laboratory measured G much higher, differing in
the 3rd decimal place.
Then New Zealand's Measurements Standard Laboratory published a
value significantly below the LTN and the University of Wuppertal
derived a value in between the NZ one and the LTN.
Notwithstanding the ever improving technological advances and
measuring techniques; using torsion pendulums, tungsten cylinders
or suspended or accelerating testmasses; 'Big G' has proven to be
intractable to conformity.